The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk factors, prevalence, and treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in Pakistan: systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Objectives To assess the available evidence on the prevalence, aetiology, treatment, and prevention of anxiety and depressive disorders in Pakistan. Design Systematic review of published literature. Studies reviewed 20 studies, of which 17 gave prevalence estimates and 11 discussed risk factors. Main outcome measures Prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders, risk factors, effects of treatment. Results Factors positively associated with anxiety and depressive disorders were female sex, middle age, low level of education, financial difficulty, being a housewife, and relationship problems. Arguments with husbands and relational problems with in-laws were positively associated in 3/11 studies. Those who had close confiding relationships were less likely to have anxiety and depressive disorders. Mean overall prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders in the community population was 34% (range 29-66% for women and 10-33% for men). There were no rigorously controlled trials of treatments for these disorders. Conclusions Available evidence suggests a major social cause for anxiety and depressive disorders in Pakistan. This evidence is limited because of methodological problems, so caution must be exercised in generalising this to the whole of the population of Pakistan.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harding, T. W., De Arango, V., Baltazar, J., Climent, C. E., Ibrahim, H. H. A., Ladrido-Ignacio, L., & Wig, N. N. (1980) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700043993 · Cited by 1,037
Cited by
Fisher, J., Cabral de Mello, M., Patel, V., Rahman, A., Tran, T., Holton, S., & Holmes, W. (2012) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.11.091850 · Cited by 1,798
Munn, Z., Moola, S., Riitano, D., & Lisy, K. (2014) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2014.71 · Cited by 1,479
Rahman, A., Malik, A., Sikander, S., Roberts, C., & Creed, F. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61400-2 · Cited by 993
A systematic review of reviews on the prevalence of anxiety disorders in adult populations
Remes, O., Brayne, C., van der Linde, R., & Lafortune, L. (2016) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.497 · Cited by 802
The Impact of COVID-19 on Anxiety in Chinese University Students
Wang, C., & Zhao, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01168 · Cited by 621
Metadata
- Authors
- Mirza, I., & Jenkins, R.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 328
- Issue
- 7443
- Pages
- 794
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2042916741
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk factors, prevalence, and treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in Pakistan: systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.328.7443.794
- The paper
- Mirza, I., & Jenkins, R. (2004). Risk factors, prevalence, and treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in Pakistan: systematic review. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7443.794
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.