Cited by 802Mental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

A systematic review of reviews on the prevalence of anxiety disorders in adult populations

Open access
Remes, Olivia, Brayne, Carol, van der Linde, Rianne, Lafortune, Louise·2016·Brain and Behavior

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A fragmented research field exists on the prevalence of anxiety disorders. Here, we present the results of a systematic review of reviews on this topic. We included the highest quality studies to inform practice and policy on this issue. METHOD: Using PRISMA methodology, extensive electronic and manual citation searches were performed to identify relevant reviews. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were undertaken by two reviewers. Inclusion criteria consisted of systematic reviews or meta-analyses on the prevalence of anxiety disorders that fulfilled at least half of the AMSTAR quality criteria. RESULTS: We identified a total of 48 reviews and described the prevalence of anxiety across population subgroups and settings, as reported by these studies. Despite the high heterogeneity of prevalence estimates across primary studies, there was emerging and compelling evidence of substantial prevalence of anxiety disorders generally (3.8-25%), and particularly in women (5.2-8.7%); young adults (2.5-9.1%); people with chronic diseases (1.4-70%); and individuals from Euro/Anglo cultures (3.8-10.4%) versus individuals from Indo/Asian (2.8%), African (4.4%), Central/Eastern European (3.2%), North African/Middle Eastern (4.9%), and Ibero/Latin cultures (6.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of anxiety disorders is high in population subgroups across the globe. Recent research has expanded its focus to Asian countries, an increasingly greater number of physical and psychiatric conditions, and traumatic events associated with anxiety. Further research on illness trajectories and anxiety levels pre- and post-treatment is needed. Few studies have been conducted in developing and under-developed parts of the world and have little representation in the global literature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/brb3.497

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Remes, O., R. Van der Linde, C. Brayne, and L. Lafortune. A systematic review of reviews on the prevalence of anxiety disorders in adult populations. PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews 2014: CRD42014014155 Available from http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42014014155 PMC4951626 27458547

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Remes, O., Brayne, C., van der Linde, R., & Lafortune, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham Westminster City Council London SW1E 6QP UK
Corresponding author
Remes, Olivia
Venue
Brain and Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-05
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
e00497-e00497
ISSN
  • 2157-9032 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-3279
OpenAlex
W2374483418
Cited by
802
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 5
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
anxiety disorders, prevalence, adults, sex differences, young adults, chronic disease, cultural differences, under-researched populations, traumatic events, mental health policy
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Review Literature as Topic, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review