Cited by 134Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningDigital Radiography and Breast ImagingHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Maximising benefit and minimising harm of screening

Open access
Gray, J A M, Patnick, J, Blanks, R G·2008·BMJ

Abstract

Gordon Brown has pledged to increase screening services in the NHS. MuirGray, Julietta Patnick, and Roger Blanks show how experience with the UK breast screening programme can help ensure that they are effective

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.39470.643218.94

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]Pritchard J. Quality assurance guidelines for mammography Oxford: NHS Breast Screening Programme, 1989
  2. [7]Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring: the definition of quality and approaches to its assessments, Vol 1-3. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1980
  3. [12]Department of Health. Cancer screening to be expanded and waiting times to be further reduced Press release 0273, September 2007. www.independenthealthcare.org.uk/downloads/briefing_papers/IHAS_Press_Releases_Sep_07.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gray, J. A. M., Patnick, J., & Blanks, R. G.
Affiliations
Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Gray, J A M
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2008-02-28
Volume
336
Issue
7642
Pages
480-483
ISSN
  • 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
OpenAlex
W2008081600
Cited by
134
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
screening programs, breast cancer screening, National Health Service, screening effectiveness, screening harms, health policy, Gordon Brown, public health services
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Decision Making, Female, United Kingdom, Health Policy, Humans, Mass Screening, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Sensitivity and Specificity, State Medicine, Program Evaluation, Harm Reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review