The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prescribing for older people
Open accessAbstract
#### Summary points About a fifth of the population in the United Kingdom is 60 years or older,1 yet people in this age group receive 59% of dispensed prescriptions and account for more than half of NHS drug costs.2 Older people often have several coexisting medical problems and take multiple drugs. Increasing age is associated with changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, so prescribing in this age group can be problematic.3 Many randomised controlled trials involving older patients focus on managing a single disease state, such as hypertension or osteoporosis, but people in this age group often have many interacting conditions and are taking many drugs, so guidance on their treatment often has to be based on consensus and involves extrapolating data derived from healthier patients. This review highlights some of the difficulties in prescribing in older patients and offers guidance for appropriate prescribing. We searched the National Library for Health, PubMed, and Embase databases using the keywords “elderly” and “prescribing”, including synonyms by the MeSH or major descriptor headings. Our search was limited to studies undertaken in humans that were published in English during the past five years. We displayed abstracts of interest using Abstract Plus before obtaining the full text of articles of interest. In addition, we searched the Cochrane Library and our own personal archives of references ### Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes With age the body undergoes several changes that can affect the distribution, metabolism, and excretion of drugs. These …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mant, J., Hobbs, F. R., Fletcher, K., Roalfe, A., Fitzmaurice, D., Lip, G. Y., & Murray, E. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61233-1 · Cited by 1,556
Cited by
Nobili, A., Garattini, S., & Mannucci, P. M. (2011) · Journal of Comorbidity · doi:10.15256/joc.2011.1.4 · Cited by 300
Gould, R. L., Coulson, M. C., Patel, N., Highton-Williamson, E., & Howard, R. J. (2014) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.126003 · Cited by 156
Banerjee, A., Mbamalu, D., Ebrahimi, S., Khan, A. A., & Chan, T. F. (2011) · International Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1186/1865-1380-4-22 · Cited by 75
Richardson, K., Loke, Y. K., Fox, C., Maidment, I., Howard, R., Steel, N., Arthur, A., Boyd, P. J., Aldus, C., Ballard, C., et al. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01821-5 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Milton, J. C., Hill-Smith, I., & Jackson, S. H. D.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-03-13
- Volume
- 336
- Issue
- 7644
- Pages
- 606-609
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- OpenAlex
- W2086976847
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prescribing for older people. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.39503.424653.80
- The paper
- Milton, J. C., Hill-Smith, I., & Jackson, S. H. D. (2008). Prescribing for older people. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39503.424653.80
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.