Cited by 156Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPain Management and Opioid Use

Interventions for Reducing Benzodiazepine Use in Older People: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Open access
Gould, Rebecca L., Coulson, Mark C., Patel, Natasha, Highton-Williamson, Elizabeth, Howard, Robert J.·2014·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of benzodiazepines has been advised against in older people, but prevalence rates remain high. AIMS: To review the evidence for interventions aimed at reducing benzodiazepine use in older people. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review, assessment of risk of bias and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials of benzodiazepine withdrawal and prescribing interventions. RESULTS: Ten withdrawal and eight prescribing studies met the inclusion criteria. At post-intervention, significantly higher odds of not using benzodiazepines were found with supervised withdrawal with psychotherapy (odds ratio (OR) = 5.06, 95% CI 2.68-9.57, P<0.00001) and withdrawal with prescribing interventions (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.02-2.02, P = 0.04) in comparison with the control interventions treatment as usual (TAU), education placebo, withdrawal with or without drug placebo, or psychotherapy alone. Significantly higher odds of not using benzodiazepines were also found for multifaceted prescribing interventions (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.10-1.72, P = 0.006) in comparison with control interventions (TAU and prescribing placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Supervised benzodiazepine withdrawal augmented with psychotherapy should be considered in older people, although pragmatic reasons may necessitate consideration of other strategies such as medication review.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.126003

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The last two meta-analyses on benzodiazepine withdrawal emphasise the effectiveness of supervised withdrawal supported by psychotherapy and in particular the addition of cognitive behavioral therapies.

    “The last two meta-analyses on the topic [84,85] emphasise the effectiveness of supervised withdrawal supported by psychotherapy and in particular the addition of cognitive behavioral therapies.”

    From Cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy for the discontinuation of long-term benzodiazepine use in insomnia and anxiety disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [85]

    The Results and Discussion report that supervised withdrawal augmented with psychotherapy improved benzodiazepine discontinuation in older people compared with control interventions. The Withdrawal interventions section says CBT was used in two of the four psychotherapy studies, but the paper reports effectiveness for psychotherapy as a group, not a separate finding that CBT was particularly effective. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan) [computer program]. Version 5.1. Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
  2. Velert Vila J, del Mar Velert Vila M, Salar Ibanez L, Avellana Zaragoza JA, Moreno Royo L. Adecuacio ´n de la utilizacio ´n de benzodiazepinas en ancianos desde la oficina de farmacia. Un estudio de colaboracio ´n me ´dico- farmace ´utico [Suitability of the use of benzodiazepines prescribed by the pharmacist in the elderly. A doctor-pharmacist collaboration study]. Aten Primaria 2012; 44: 402-10.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gould, R. L., Coulson, M. C., Patel, N., Highton-Williamson, E., & Howard, R. J.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Gould, Rebecca L.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2014-02
Volume
204
Issue
2
Pages
98-107
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W1999146743
Cited by
156
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • King's College London
  • King's Health Partners
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
benzodiazepines, older adults, benzodiazepine withdrawal, prescribing interventions, psychotherapy, medication review, polypharmacy
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Benzodiazepines, Combined Modality Therapy, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Utilization, Humans, Placebos, Psychotherapy, Regression Analysis, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Bias, Odds Ratio, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review