Cited by 75Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPharmacy and Medical PracticesEmergency and Acute Care Studies

The prevalence of polypharmacy in elderly attenders to an emergency department—a problem with a need for an effective solution

Open access
Banerjee, Ashis, Mbamalu, David, Ebrahimi, Sayed, Khan, Arshad Ali, Chan, Toong Foo·2011·International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

We studied the prevalence of polypharmacy in attenders aged 75 years and over to an emergency department (ED) in North London over a period of 1 month. We identified 467 patients in this age group. Analysis of medications being prescribed revealed at least 82 patients on medication with the potential for adverse interaction. There is a need for ED-initiated strategies to identify interactions and for pathways to allow for medication review.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1865-1380-4-22

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The importance of medication counts in the model may either reflect a proxy feature for medical complexity or indicate that polypharmacy itself is a risk factor.

    “the importance of medication counts in the model may either reflect a proxy feature for medical complexity or indicate that polypharmacy itself is a risk factor [42,43].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banerjee, A., Mbamalu, D., Ebrahimi, S., Khan, A. A., & Chan, T. F.
Affiliations
Chase Farm Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Banerjee, Ashis
Venue
International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Published
2011-06-02
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
22-22
ISSN
  • 1865-1372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-1380
OpenAlex
W2101170018
Cited by
75
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
polypharmacy, elderly patients, drug-drug interactions, adverse drug interactions, medication review, drug prescribing, older adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review