Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lung protective mechanical ventilation and two year survival in patients with acute lung injury: prospective cohort study

Open access
Needham, D. M., Colantuoni, E., Mendez-Tellez, P. A., Dinglas, V. D., Sevransky, J. E., Dennison Himmelfarb, C. R., Desai, S. V., Shanholtz, C., Brower, R. G., Pronovost, P. J.·2012·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of volume limited and pressure limited (lung protective) mechanical ventilation with two year survival in patients with acute lung injury. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: 13 intensive care units at four hospitals in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 485 consecutive mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Two year survival after onset of acute lung injury. RESULTS: 485 patients contributed data for 6240 eligible ventilator settings, as measured twice daily (median of eight eligible ventilator settings per patient; 41% of which adhered to lung protective ventilation). Of these patients, 311 (64%) died within two years. After adjusting for the total duration of ventilation and other relevant covariates, each additional ventilator setting adherent to lung protective ventilation was associated with a 3% decrease in the risk of mortality over two years (hazard ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 0.99, P=0.002). Compared with no adherence, the estimated absolute risk reduction in two year mortality for a prototypical patient with 50% adherence to lung protective ventilation was 4.0% (0.8% to 7.2%, P=0.012) and with 100% adherence was 7.8% (1.6% to 14.0%, P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Lung protective mechanical ventilation was associated with a substantial long term survival benefit for patients with acute lung injury. Greater use of lung protective ventilation in routine clinical practice could reduce long term mortality in patients with acute lung injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00300248.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.e2124

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Needham, D. M., Colantuoni, E., Mendez-Tellez, P. A., Dinglas, V. D., Sevransky, J. E., Dennison Himmelfarb, C. R., Desai, S. V., Shanholtz, C., Brower, R. G., & Pronovost, P. J.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-04-05
Volume
344
Issue
apr05 2
Pages
e2124-e2124
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041783300
Cited by
353
References
44
FWCI
26.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lung protective mechanical ventilation and two year survival in patients with acute lung injury: prospective cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.e2124
The paper
Needham, D. M., Colantuoni, E., Mendez-Tellez, P. A., Dinglas, V. D., Sevransky, J. E., Dennison Himmelfarb, C. R., Desai, S. V., Shanholtz, C., Brower, R. G., & Pronovost, P. J. (2012). Lung protective mechanical ventilation and two year survival in patients with acute lung injury: prospective cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2124

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.