CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPharmaceutical industry and healthcareHealth Services Management and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Whole System Demonstrator trial: policy, politics, and publication ethics

Greenhalgh, T.·2012·BMJ
DOI 10.1136/bmj.e5280
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Limitations listed for the Whole System Demonstrator trial of telehealth did not include close involvement of the funder in its design and execution. Under “Finances,” the authors state: “The Department of Health reviewed the protocol . . . and provided project manager support.”1 The Department of Health makes greater claims for its …

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.e5280

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selection bias may have influenced the WSD results, as only 20% of those initially interviewed during recruitment were cleared for participation.

    “Selection bias may also have influenced the results, as only 20% of those initially interviewed during recruitment to the trial were cleared for participation, while the potential influence of political drivers has also raised questions about the results [111].”

    From The Impact of Telehealthcare on the Quality and Safety of Care: A Systematic Overview (2013) · cites this paper as [111]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Greenhalgh, T.
Affiliations
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Greenhalgh, T.
ORCID
Greenhalgh, T.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-08-06
Volume
345
Issue
aug06 2
Pages
e5280-e5280
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1136/bmj.e5280
OpenAlex
W2118122685
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
Keywords
telemedicine, publication ethics, research funding, conflicts of interest, Department of Health, science policy, research integrity
MeSH terms
Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Mortality, Telemedicine, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review