Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalent abnormal prion protein in human appendixes after bovine spongiform encephalopathy epizootic: large scale survey

Open access
Gill, O. N., Spencer, Y., Richard-Loendt, A., Kelly, C., Dabaghian, R., Boyes, L., Linehan, J., Simmons, M., Webb, P., Bellerby, P., Andrews, N., Hilton, D. A., Ironside, J. W., Beck, J., Poulter, M., Mead, S., Brandner, S.·2013·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To carry out a further survey of archived appendix samples to understand better the differences between existing estimates of the prevalence of subclinical infection with prions after the bovine spongiform encephalopathy epizootic and to see whether a broader birth cohort was affected, and to understand better the implications for the management of blood and blood products and for the handling of surgical instruments. DESIGN: Irreversibly unlinked and anonymised large scale survey of archived appendix samples. SETTING: Archived appendix samples from the pathology departments of 41 UK hospitals participating in the earlier survey, and additional hospitals in regions with lower levels of participation in that survey. SAMPLE: 32,441 archived appendix samples fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin and tested for the presence of abnormal prion protein (PrP). RESULTS: Of the 32,441 appendix samples 16 were positive for abnormal PrP, indicating an overall prevalence of 493 per million population (95% confidence interval 282 to 801 per million). The prevalence in those born in 1941-60 (733 per million, 269 to 1596 per million) did not differ significantly from those born between 1961 and 1985 (412 per million, 198 to 758 per million) and was similar in both sexes and across the three broad geographical areas sampled. Genetic testing of the positive specimens for the genotype at PRNP codon 129 revealed a high proportion that were valine homozygous compared with the frequency in the normal population, and in stark contrast with confirmed clinical cases of vCJD, all of which were methionine homozygous at PRNP codon 129. CONCLUSIONS: This study corroborates previous studies and suggests a high prevalence of infection with abnormal PrP, indicating vCJD carrier status in the population compared with the 177 vCJD cases to date. These findings have important implications for the management of blood and blood products and for the handling of surgical instruments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.f5675

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Gill, O. N., Spencer, Y., Richard-Loendt, A., Kelly, C., Dabaghian, R., Boyes, L., Linehan, J., Simmons, M., Webb, P., Bellerby, P., Andrews, N., Hilton, D. A., Ironside, J. W., Beck, J., Poulter, M., Mead, S., & Brandner, S.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-10-15
Volume
347
Issue
oct15 5
Pages
f5675-f5675
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137782260
Cited by
300
References
30
FWCI
16.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalent abnormal prion protein in human appendixes after bovine spongiform encephalopathy epizootic: large scale survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.f5675
The paper
Gill, O. N., Spencer, Y., Richard-Loendt, A., Kelly, C., Dabaghian, R., Boyes, L., Linehan, J., Simmons, M., Webb, P., Bellerby, P., Andrews, N., Hilton, D. A., Ironside, J. W., Beck, J., Poulter, M., Mead, S., & Brandner, S. (2013). Prevalent abnormal prion protein in human appendixes after bovine spongiform encephalopathy epizootic: large scale survey. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5675

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.