Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 450

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under-diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: prospective cohort study

Open access
Shah, Anoop S V, Griffiths, Megan, Lee, Kuan Ken, McAllister, David A, Hunter, Amanda L, Ferry, Amy V, Cruikshank, Anne, Reid, Alan, Stoddart, Mary, Strachan, Fiona, Walker, Simon, Collinson, Paul O, Apple, Fred S, Gray, Alasdair J, Fox, Keith A A, Newby, David E, Mills, Nicholas L·2015·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnosis of myocardial infarction using a high sensitivity troponin I assay and sex specific diagnostic thresholds in men and women with suspected acute coronary syndrome. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Regional cardiac centre, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=1126, 46% women). Two cardiologists independently adjudicated the diagnosis of myocardial infarction by using a high sensitivity troponin I assay with sex specific diagnostic thresholds (men 34 ng/L, women 16 ng/L) and compared with current practice where a contemporary assay (50 ng/L, single threshold) was used to guide care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Diagnosis of myocardial infarction. RESULTS: The high sensitivity troponin I assay noticeably increased the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women (from 11% to 22%; P<0.001) but had a minimal effect in men (from 19% to 21%, P=0.002). Women were less likely than men to be referred to a cardiologist or undergo coronary revascularisation (P<0.05 for both). At 12 months, women with undisclosed increases in troponin concentration (17-49 ng/L) and those with myocardial infarction (≥50 ng/L) had the highest rate of death or reinfarction compared with women without (≤16 ng/L) myocardial infarction (25%, 24%, and 4%, respectively; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although having little effect in men, a high sensitivity troponin assay with sex specific diagnostic thresholds may double the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women and identify those at high risk of reinfarction and death. Whether use of sex specific diagnostic thresholds will improve outcomes and tackle inequalities in the treatment of women with suspected acute coronary syndrome requires urgent attention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.g7873

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 450

Metadata

Authors
Shah, A. S. V., Griffiths, M., Lee, K. K., McAllister, D. A., Hunter, A. L., Ferry, A. V., Cruikshank, A., Reid, A., Stoddart, M., Strachan, F., Walker, S., Collinson, P. O., Apple, F. S., Gray, A. J., Fox, K. A. A., Newby, D. E., & Mills, N. L.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-01-21
Volume
350
Pages
g7873
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096907419
Cited by
450
References
3
FWCI
43.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under-diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: prospective cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.g7873
The paper
Shah, A. S. V., Griffiths, M., Lee, K. K., McAllister, D. A., Hunter, A. L., Ferry, A. V., Cruikshank, A., Reid, A., Stoddart, M., Strachan, F., Walker, S., Collinson, P. O., Apple, F. S., Gray, A. J., Fox, K. A. A., Newby, D. E., & Mills, N. L. (2015). High sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under-diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: prospective cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7873

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.