Cited by 72Pharmaceutical industry and healthcareAcademic integrity and plagiarismBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

80% of China’s clinical trial data are fraudulent, investigation finds

Woodhead, Michael·2016·BMJ

Abstract

Just over 80% of clinical trial data submitted to support new drug registrations in China have been revealed as fraudulent or substandard by the country’s drug regulator. An investigation of data for 1622 new drugs submitted to China’s State Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) for registration said that 1308 of the applications should be withdrawn because they contained fabricated, flawed, or inadequate data from clinical trials.1 In a damning report released on 9 September the CFDA described the findings of widespread fraud as shocking and vowed to crack down on what it described as a “chaotic” situation in the country’s clinical trials industry. Much of the blame was attributed to the country’s loosely regulated clinical research organisations, which industry insiders claimed operate in …

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.i5396

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woodhead, M.
Corresponding author
Woodhead, Michael
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-10-05
Volume
355
Pages
i5396
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2528692259
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
data fabrication, drug registration, State Food and Drug Administration, regulatory oversight, clinical research regulation, pharmaceutical industry, China
MeSH terms
China, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Industry, Government Agencies, Humans, Scientific Misconduct, Drug Approval, Federal Government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review