80% of China’s clinical trial data are fraudulent, investigation finds
Abstract
Just over 80% of clinical trial data submitted to support new drug registrations in China have been revealed as fraudulent or substandard by the country’s drug regulator. An investigation of data for 1622 new drugs submitted to China’s State Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) for registration said that 1308 of the applications should be withdrawn because they contained fabricated, flawed, or inadequate data from clinical trials.1 In a damning report released on 9 September the CFDA described the findings of widespread fraud as shocking and vowed to crack down on what it described as a “chaotic” situation in the country’s clinical trials industry. Much of the blame was attributed to the country’s loosely regulated clinical research organisations, which industry insiders claimed operate in …
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The integrity of Chinese clinical studies has been under serious scrutiny because of insufficient ethical considerations.
“Second, the integrity of Chinese clinical studies has been under serious scrutiny because of a high proportion of studies that have reported ‘statistically significant’ results [10], no to extremely low drop-out rates [11, 12] and insufficient ethical considerations [10, 13].”
News in the past few years has implicated an alarmingly high proportion of plagiarism, falsification or fabrication in the scientific and clinical literature from China.
“Moreover, news in the past few years has implicated an alarmingly high proportion of plagiarism, falsification or fabrication in the scientific and clinical literature from China [13–15].”
The investigators' experiences indicate that identifying RCTs at low risk of bias among those from the CNKI can be onerous: simple inquiry with study authors may not be sufficient, and ascertaining the pre-published protocol and source data may be required.
“However, our experiences in the course of the present study indicate that identifying RCTs at low risk of bias among those from the CNKI can be an onerous task: simple inquiry with the study authors may not be sufficient; ascertaining the pre-published protocol and the source data may be required [13].”
Some individuals suggest clinical trial fraud is "an open secret" in China.
“Some individuals suggest clinical trial fraud is “an open secret” in China [13].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leucht, S., Leucht, C., Huhn, M., Chaimani, A., Mavridis, D., Helfer, B., Samara, M., Rabaioli, M., Bächer, S., Cipriani, A., et al. (2017) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16121358 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Dose-response meta-analysis of antipsychotic drugs for acute schizophrenia
Leucht, S., Crippa, A., Siafis, S., Patel, M. X., Orsini, N., & Davis, J. M. (2020) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19010034 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Zhu, Y., Li, C., Huhn, M., Rothe, P., Krause, M., Bighelli, I., Schneider‐Thoma, J., & Leucht, S. (2017) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.06.011 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Zhu, Y., Krause, M., Huhn, M., Rothe, P., Schneider‐Thoma, J., Chaimani, A., Li, C., Davis, J. M., & Leucht, S. (2017) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30270-5 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention: A network meta-analysis
Shi, C., Dumville, J. C., & Cullum, N. A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192707 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Burschinski, A., Schneider-Thoma, J., Chiocchia, V., Schestag, K., Wang, D., Siafis, S., Bighelli, I., Wu, H., Hansen, W.-P., Priller, J., et al. (2023) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21036 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Schneider‐Thoma, J., Efthimiou, O., Huhn, M., Krause, M., Reichelt, L., Röder, H., Davis, J. M., Salanti, G., & Leucht, S. (2018) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30177-9 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Sabé, M., Zhao, N., Crippa, A., & Kaiser, S. (2021) · Schizophrenia · doi:10.1038/s41537-021-00171-2 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Gutsmiedl, K., Krause, M., Bighelli, I., Schneider‐Thoma, J., & Leucht, S. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02514-2 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Tong, Z., Li, F., Ogawa, Y., Watanabe, N., & Furukawa, T. A. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0554-2 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Campana, M., Falkai, P., Siskind, D. J., Hasan, A., & Wagner, E. M. (2021) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2020.12.002 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Shi, C., Dumville, J. C., Cullum, N. A., Rhodes, S., McInnes, E., Goh, E. L., & Norman, G. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013761.pub2 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Schneider‐Thoma, J., Efthimiou, O., Bighelli, I., Doerries, C., Huhn, M., Krause, M., Reichelt, L., Röder, H., Furukawa, T. A., Davis, J. M., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30223-8 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Leucht, S., Chaimani, A., Leucht, C., Huhn, M., Mavridis, D., Helfer, B., Samara, M. T., Cipriani, A., Geddes, J. R., Salanti, G., et al. (2018) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2018.05.009 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“We a priori excluded Chinese studies due to quality concerns (Woodhead, 2016; Wu et al., 2006).”
BackgroundLeucht, S., Chaimani, A., Mavridis, D., Leucht, C., Huhn, M., Helfer, B., Samara, M. T., Cipriani, A., Geddes, J. R., & Davis, J. M. (2019) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-019-0440-6 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Sarris, J. J., Marx, W., Ashton, M. M., Ng, C. H., Coelho, N. L. G., Ayati, Z., Zhang, Z., Kasper, S. F., Ravindran, A. V., Harvey, B. H., et al. (2021) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0706743720979917 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Wang, D., Schneider-Thoma, J., Siafis, S., Burschinski, A., Dong, S., Wu, H., Zhu, Y., Davis, J. M., Priller, J., & Leucht, S. (2024) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbad089 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Antipsychotic dose reduction compared to dose continuation for people with schizophrenia
Rodolico, A., Siafis, S., Bighelli, I., Samara, M. T., Hansen, W., Salomone, S., Aguglia, E., Cutrufelli, P., Bauer, I. O. B., Bäckers, L., et al. (2022) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd014384.pub2 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Paris, G., Bighelli, I., Deste, G., Siafis, S., Schneider‐Thoma, J., Zhu, Y., Davis, J. M., Vita, A., & Leucht, S. (2021) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2021.01.021 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Importing oncology trials from China: a bridge over troubled waters?
Singh, H., & Pazdur, R. M. (2022) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00071-7 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Use of Real-World Evidence for Oncology Clinical Decision Making in Emerging Economies
Petracci, F. E., Ghai, C., Pangilinan, A., Suarez, L. A., Uehara, R., & Ghosn, M. G. (2021) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2021-0425 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Effects of Trazodone on Sleep: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Kokkali, M., Pinioti, E., Lappas, A. S., Christodoulou, G. N., & Samara, M. T. (2024) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40263-024-01110-2 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Huhn, M., Arndt, T. J., Schneider‐Thoma, J., & Leucht, S. (2022) · Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/20451253221097261 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Okuyama, Y., Oya, K., Matsunaga, S., Kishi, T., & Iwata, N. (2016) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s125367 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“46 Some studies included in the meta-analysis did not report detailed information about sequence generation or allocation concealment.”
Antipsychotic polypharmacy reduction versus polypharmacy continuation for people with schizophrenia
Bighelli, I., Rodolico, A., Siafis, S., Samara, M. T., Hansen, W., Salomone, S., Aguglia, E., Cutrufelli, P., Bauer, I. O. B., Bäckers, L., et al. (2022) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd014383.pub2 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Studies from mainland China oOen use other randomisation methods than the internationally approved ones, the reports are very short and the methods are oOen not described in details (Woodhead 2016).”
MethodInfluentialSchneider‐Thoma, J., Kapfhammer, A., Wang, D., Bighelli, I., Siafis, S., Wu, H., Hansen, W., Davis, J. M., Salanti, G., & Leucht, S. (2021) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01760-z · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Amendola, S., Bernath, J., Presaghi, F., Waller, G., & Hengartner, M. P. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.04.108 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Phatthanasobhon, S., Nochaiwong, S., Thavorn, K., Noppakun, K., Panyathong, S., Suteeka, Y., Hutton, B., Sood, M. M., Knoll, G. A., & Ruengorn, C. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55561-5 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Palchik, G. A., Chen, C., & Giordano, J. (2017) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-017-9308-9 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Bighelli, I., Salanti, G., Reitmeir, C., Wallis, S., Barbui, C., Furukawa, T. A., & Leucht, S. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019280 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Wilkinson, J., Heal, C., Antoniou, G. A., Flemyng, E., Avenell, A., Barbour, V., Bordewijk, E. M., Brown, N. J. L., Clarke, M., Dumville, J., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111512 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Siafis, S., McCutcheon, R. A., Chiocchia, V., Ostinelli, E. G., Wright, S. L., Stansfield, C., Juma, D. O., Mantas, I., Howes, O. D., Rutigliano, G., et al. (2023) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19866.1 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Mainoli, B., Machado, T. L. G. N., Duarte, G. S., et al. (2021) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01233-w · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Unveiling quality of clinical trial in China: from concern to confirmation
Huang, H., Hou, Y., Fang, H., et al. (2024) · 癌症:英文版 · doi:10.1002/cac2.12528 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“quality, which could be associated with the self-inspection initiative in 2015 [3].”
BackgroundHan, X., Li, X., Liang, N., et al. (2019) · Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.09.004 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Payedimarri, A. B., Mouhssine, S., Aljadeeah, S., Gaïdano, G., & Ravinetto, R. (2023) · BMJ Oncology · doi:10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000101 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Applying Rational Choice Theory to Authors' Behaviors in Unethical Publishing in China
Xia, J. (2018) · Library trends · doi:10.1353/lib.2018.0035 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“…market of buying/selling scientific papers (Culliford 2013); the unpromising presence of computer-generated nonsense articles (Van Noorden 2014); and the instant growth of falsified data in clinical trials—over 80 percent of all trials with such a problem detected as of 2016 (Woodhead 2016).”
BackgroundAntipsychotic polypharmacy reduction versus polypharmacy continuation for people with schizophrenia
Bighelli, I., Samara, M. T., Rodolico, A., Hansen, W., & Leucht, S. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd014383 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Promoting the quality and transparency of health research in China
Ma, Y., Wang, Q., Duan, Y., Shi, Q., Zhang, X., Yang, K., Li, Y., Moher, D., Chen, Y., & Bian, Z. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.10.004 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Current System of Overseeing Drug Trials in Developing Countries by the FDA Is Dangerous
White, C. M. (2020) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1177/1060028020906484 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Current Issues on Research Conducted to Improve Women’s Health
Siristatidis, C. S., Karageorgiou, V., & Vogiatzi, P. (2021) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare9010092 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Huang, N., Huang, W., Luo, Y., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1052977 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“This is a famous event in the field of clinical trials in China, also known as the “722” event (Woodhead, 2016).”
BackgroundClozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia
Samara, M. T., & Leucht, S. (2017) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.210.4.299 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Wang, B., Lai, J., Jin, F., et al. (2022) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/42754 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“In 2016, a foreign researcher published an article in the British Medical Journal claiming that 80% of China’s clinical trial data were fraudulent, which brought great reputational damage to China’s clinical research field [26].”
Meta-cognitive training for schizophrenia
Guaiana, G., Lucarini, V., Ebuenyi, I. D., Abbatecola, M., Tarantino, F., Santoro, A., Ghiandi, G., Cappiello, A., & Pinto, A. (2023) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd015490 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Lappas, A. S., Helfer, B., Henke‐Ciążyńska, K., Samara, M. T., & Christodoulou, G. N. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12185801 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Quality of Drug Clinical Trials in China: A Mixed Methods Research
Chen, X., Chu, H., Zhang, X., Li, H., Meng, J., & Wu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1111/jebm.70085 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“While China’s pharmaceutical industry has experienced remarkable growth and innovation, concerns remain about the credibility of drug clinical trial data originating from the region [16].”
Impacts of clinical research units on clinical research — a systematic review of empirical studies
Wang, F., Wang, X., Liu, E., et al. (2025) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-025-02813-3 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Moreover, concerns about substandard quality and research misconduct have led to increasingly complex regulatory and quality assurance requirements [2, 3].”
Antipsychotic dose reduction compared to dose continuation for people with schizophrenia
Bighelli, I., Samara, M. T., Rodolico, A., Hansen, W., & Leucht, S. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd014384 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Hersh, W. (2020) · Health informatics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47686-1_2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Controversies with Clinical Trial Regulations in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Rake, B. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2_23 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Leucht, S., Siafis, S., Schneider‐Thoma, J., Tajika, A., Priller, J., Davis, J. M., & Furukawa, T. A. (2024) · Schizophrenia · doi:10.1038/s41537-024-00442-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Walters, J., & Brückner, T. (2023) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202310.1108.v1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Jia, Y., Jiang, Y., Wu, P., Yun, Q., Wu, H., Yang, Z., Wang, W., Song, Y., Wang, W., Tang, Y., et al. (2026) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/annals-25-01344 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Jiang, Y., Zhong, C. C., Wang, B. H., Xu, S., Ho, F. F., Kwong, M. H., Ho, L. T. F., Zhou, J. H.-S., Lam, K., Liu, J.-P., et al. (2026) · Integrative Medicine Research · doi:10.1016/j.imr.2026.101317 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“39 In response, the Chinese government implemented a series of decrees to regulate the conduct of clinical research, 40-45 leading to trial withdrawal and serious repercussions for research involving data falsification.”
Current challenges and future perspectives of drug discovery in China
Han, W., Zhou, Q.-T., & Wang, M.-W. (2025) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2025.2468290 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“A critical turning point came with the ‘722 Event’ – the 22 July 2015 exposure by the regulatory authority of widespread issues in clinical trial data integrity that prompted a nationwide overhaul [27,28].”
Generics have a chequered recent history
Goh, S. L. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i6527
Strengthen Supervision of Academic Science: An Uphill Struggle
Yu, Z., Kong, S., & Jia, Z. (2017) · Archives of Medicine · doi:10.21767/1989-5216.1000204
“Recently, an investigation found that major of China's clinical trials were fraudulent [1], which indeed harm the scientific property of research as well as stir globe critical criticism.”
BackgroundEthics of Outsourcing Drug Trials
Barat, S. (2021) · International Journal of Applied Research on Public Health Management · doi:10.4018/ijarphm.2021070101
Çıray, R. O., Hançer, P., Tunçtürk, M., & İnal, N. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.5505/kpd.2020.45822
International Collaboration and Competition
Balas, E. A. (2018) · doi:10.1002/9781119225898.ch22
Promoting the Quality and Transparency of Health Research in ChinaPreprint
Ma, Y., Wang, Q., Duan, Y., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4186778
Ma, C. F., Chien, W. T., Chan, S. K. W., & Wong, C. L. (2022) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd014970
Dangers of FDA Oversight of Clinical Trials in Developing Countries
White, C. M. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2_24
Ethics of Outsourcing Drug Trials
Barat, S. (2023) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-2045-7.ch037
Стволовые клетки и клеточная терапия: критический обзорPreprint
Jargin, S. V. (2025) · doi:10.24108/preprints-3113700
Стволовые клетки и клеточная терапия: критический обзорPreprint
Jargin, S. V. (2025) · doi:10.24108/preprints-3113701
Stem Cells and Cell Therapy: A Critical Review
Jargin, S. V. (2025) · Cell and Tissue Biology · doi:10.1134/s1990519x2560070x
“More than 80% of clinical trial data submitted to support new drug approvals in China have been reported to be unreliable (Woodhead, 2016).”
Jiang, Y., Hou, Y., Fang, H. Y., et al. (2026) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-025-3245-8
“Prior to July 22, 2015, China ’ s pharmaceutical industry was globally perceived as dominated by substandard generic drugs and plagued by data fraud, casting doubt on clinical trial quality (Woodhead, 2016).”
- Authors
- Woodhead, M.
- Corresponding author
- Woodhead, Michael
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2016-10-05
- Volume
- 355
- Pages
- i5396
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2528692259
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Keywords
- data fabrication, drug registration, State Food and Drug Administration, regulatory oversight, clinical research regulation, pharmaceutical industry, China
- MeSH terms
- China, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Industry, Government Agencies, Humans, Scientific Misconduct, Drug Approval, Federal Government
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review