Cited by 208Mental Health and Patient InvolvementCommunity Health and DevelopmentHealth Policy Implementation Science

Evaluating patient and public involvement in research

Boivin, Antoine, Richards, Tessa, Forsythe, Laura, Grégoire, Alexandre, L’Espérance, Audrey, Abelson, Julia, Carman, Kristin L·2018·BMJ

Abstract

If we are serious about involvement, we need to be equally serious about evaluation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.k5147

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mechanisms through which the benefits of youth engagement are achieved have rarely been articulated or tested.

    “Yet, the mechanisms through which these benefits are achieved have rarely been articulated or tested, highlighting the lack of evaluation studies as one of the most critical gaps in the literature.”
  • The biggest gap in this area of research is the lack of evidence on impact gained through rigorous evaluation.

    “Given the near‐unanimous recognition that the biggest gap in this area of research is the lack of evidence on impact gained through rigorous evaluation, 43 , 57 , 58 , 61 , 90 the small number of impact‐focused models and frameworks is noteworthy.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Grégoire, A., L’Espérance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L.
Affiliations
  • Centre d’excellence sur le partenariat avec les patients et le public (CA)
  • BMJ Group (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (US)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Boivin, Antoine
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-12-06
Volume
363
Pages
k5147
ISSN
  • 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
OpenAlex
W2902607609
Cited by
208
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
patient and public involvement, research evaluation, research participation
MeSH terms
Community Participation, Humans, Patient Participation, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review