Omega-3, omega-6, and total dietary polyunsaturated fat for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Objective To assess effects of increasing omega-3, omega-6, and total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) on diabetes diagnosis and glucose metabolism. Design Systematic review and meta-analyses. Data sources Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Clinicaltrials.gov, and trials in relevant systematic reviews. Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials of at least 24 weeks’ duration assessing effects of increasing α-linolenic acid, long chain omega-3, omega-6, or total PUFA, which collected data on diabetes diagnoses, fasting glucose or insulin, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and/or homoeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Data synthesis Statistical analysis included random effects meta-analyses using relative risk and mean difference, and sensitivity analyses. Funnel plots were examined and subgrouping assessed effects of intervention type, replacement, baseline risk of diabetes and use of antidiabetes drugs, trial duration, and dose. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool and quality of evidence with GRADE. Results 83 randomised controlled trials (mainly assessing effects of supplementary long chain omega-3) were included; 10 were at low summary risk of bias. Long chain omega-3 had little or no effect on likelihood of diagnosis of diabetes (relative risk 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.17; 58 643 participants, 3.7% developed diabetes) or measures of glucose metabolism (HbA1cmean difference −0.02%, 95% confidence interval −0.07% to 0.04%; plasma glucose 0.04, 0.02 to 0.07, mmol/L; fasting insulin 1.02, −4.34 to 6.37, pmol/L; HOMA-IR 0.06, −0.21 to 0.33). A suggestion of negative outcomes was observed when dose of supplemental long chain omega-3 was above 4.4 g/d. Effects of α-linolenic acid, omega-6, and total PUFA on diagnosis of diabetes were unclear (as the evidence was of very low quality), but little or no effect on measures of glucose metabolism was seen, except that increasing α-linolenic acid may increase fasting insulin (by about 7%). No evidence was found that the omega-3/omega-6 ratio is important for diabetes or glucose metabolism. Conclusions This is the most extensive systematic review of trials to date to assess effects of polyunsaturated fats on newly diagnosed diabetes and glucose metabolism, including previously unpublished data following contact with authors. Evidence suggests that increasing omega-3, omega-6, or total PUFA has little or no effect on prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42017064110.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dietary supplementation with PUFAs may have little or no effect on type 2 diabetes prevention or measures of insulin resistance in at-risk patients.
“Nonetheless, a large meta-analysis of controlled trial, has recently evidenced that dietary supplementation with PUFAs may have little or no effect on TD2 prevention, or measures of IR, in at-risk patients [54].”
From Mediterranean diet nutrients to turn the tide against insulin resistance and related diseases (2020) · cites this paper as [54]
In individuals with type 2 diabetes, two systematic reviews with n-3 and n-6 fatty acids concluded that the dietary supplements did not improve glycemic management.
“In individuals with type 2 diabetes, two systematic reviews with n-3 and n-6 fatty acids concluded that the dietary supplements did not improve glycemic management (159,211).”
From 5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes:<i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [211]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 313
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [9]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification. NICE, 2014. 32200592
- [43]Higgins JP Altman DG Sterne JA Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies In: Higgins JP Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
- [54]Scorletti E Bhatia B McCormick KG Potential benefits of purified long chain omega-3 fatty acid treatment in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): A potential treatment for early NAFLD in metabolic syndrome and Type 2 diabetes. Results from the WELCOME study. Diabet Med 2014; 31: 1.
- Authors
- Brown, T. J., Brainard, J., Song, F., Wang, X., Abdelhamid, A., & Hooper, L.
- Affiliations
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hooper, Lee
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2019-08-21
- Volume
- 366
- Pages
- l4697
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- PMC
- PMC6699594
- OpenAlex
- W2954411826
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Pennsylvania
- Pennsylvania State University
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- McMaster University
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri - IRCCS
- University of Southampton
- University of Aberdeen
- University of Bristol
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
- University of Wollongong
- Odense Universitetshospital
- Royal Adelaide Hospital
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
- Università degli Studi di Pavia
- Universitetet i Bergen
- Universidad de Valladolid
- Akershus Universitetssykehus
- National Institutes of Health (AREDS2)
- Penn State College of Medicine
- Wageningen University and Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
- Keywords
- omega-3 fatty acids, omega-6 fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, type 2 diabetes, alpha-linolenic acid, dietary fat, glucose metabolism, insulin resistance, HbA1c, fasting insulin, diabetes prevention, dose-response relationship, risk of bias, quality of evidence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dietary Fats, Unsaturated, Fasting, Fatty Acids, Unsaturated, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Male, Primary Prevention, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Dietary Supplements, Fatty Acids, Omega-6, Secondary Prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review