Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of personal protective equipment against coronavirus disease 2019 by healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China: cross sectional study

Open access
Liu, Min, Cheng, Shou-Zhen, Xu, Ke-Wei, Yang, Yang, Zhu, Qing-Tang, Zhang, Hui, Yang, Da-Ya, Cheng, Shu-Yuan, Xiao, Han, Wang, Ji-Wen, Yao, He-Rui, Cong, Yu-Tian, Zhou, Yu-Qi, Peng, Sui, Kuang, Ming, Hou, Fan-Fan, Cheng, KK, Xiao, Hai-Peng·2020·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To examine the protective effects of appropriate personal protective equipment for frontline healthcare professionals who provided care for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19). Design: Cross sectional study. Setting: Four hospitals in Wuhan, China. Participants: 420 healthcare professionals (116 doctors and 304 nurses) who were deployed to Wuhan by two affiliated hospitals of Sun Yat-sen University and Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University for 6-8 weeks from 24 January to 7 April 2020. These study participants were provided with appropriate personal protective equipment to deliver healthcare to patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 and were involved in aerosol generating procedures. 77 healthcare professionals with no exposure history to covid-19 and 80 patients who had recovered from covid-19 were recruited to verify the accuracy of antibody testing. Main outcome measures: Covid-19 related symptoms (fever, cough, and dyspnoea) and evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, defined as a positive test for virus specific nucleic acids in nasopharyngeal swabs, or a positive test for IgM or IgG antibodies in the serum samples. Results: The average age of study participants was 35.8 years and 68.1% (286/420) were women. These study participants worked 4-6 hour shifts for an average of 5.4 days a week; they worked an average of 16.2 hours each week in intensive care units. All 420 study participants had direct contact with patients with covid-19 and performed at least one aerosol generating procedure. During the deployment period in Wuhan, none of the study participants reported covid-19 related symptoms. When the participants returned home, they all tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 specific nucleic acids and IgM or IgG antibodies (95% confidence interval 0.0 to 0.7%). Conclusion: Before a safe and effective vaccine becomes available, healthcare professionals remain susceptible to covid-19. Despite being at high risk of exposure, study participants were appropriately protected and did not contract infection or develop protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Healthcare systems must give priority to the procurement and distribution of personal protective equipment, and provide adequate training to healthcare professionals in its use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.m2195

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Liu, M., Cheng, S.-Z., Xu, K.-W., Yang, Y., Zhu, Q.-T., Zhang, H., Yang, D.-Y., Cheng, S.-Y., Xiao, H., Wang, J.-W., Yao, H.-R., Cong, Y.-T., Zhou, Y.-Q., Peng, S., Kuang, M., Hou, F.-F., Cheng, K., & Xiao, H.-P.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-06-10
Volume
369
Pages
m2195
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033368763
Cited by
294
References
16
FWCI
31.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of personal protective equipment against coronavirus disease 2019 by healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China: cross sectional study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.m2195
The paper
Liu, M., Cheng, S.-Z., Xu, K.-W., Yang, Y., Zhu, Q.-T., Zhang, H., Yang, D.-Y., Cheng, S.-Y., Xiao, H., Wang, J.-W., Yao, H.-R., Cong, Y.-T., Zhou, Y.-Q., Peng, S., Kuang, M., Hou, F.-F., Cheng, K., & Xiao, H.-P. (2020). Use of personal protective equipment against coronavirus disease 2019 by healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China: cross sectional study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2195

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.