Cited by 13Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmaceutical Economics and Policy

Methylphenidate for ADHD rejected from the WHO Essential Medicines List due to uncertainties in benefit-harm profile

Open access
Storebø, Ole Jakob, Gluud, Christian·2021·BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common psychiatric disorder with estimated global prevalence rates between 3% and 5% in children and 2.5% in adults, depending on the classification system used. The psychostimulant methylphenidate is one of the most frequently used medications for ADHD. In this analysis article we describe shortly the evidence in the field, an application for inclusion of methylphenidate on the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines, the comments raised to the application and the WHO Expert Committee’s decision. The application of getting methylphenidate on the WHO list was overzealous in reporting potential benefits, without highlighting key uncertainties and harms. Decisions encompassing medicines candidate to the WHO Model List should not be based on speculation about potential benefits and should fully incorporate areas of uncertainties. Even though methylphenidate has been used for over 60 years, the evidence concerning the benefits of this medication in children, adolescents and adults with ADHD is uncertain. The decision of the committee was to not include methylphenidate in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines ‘due to uncertainties in the estimates of benefit, and concerns regarding the quality and limitations of the available evidence for both benefit and harm’.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111328

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Storebø, O. J., & Gluud, C.
Affiliations
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Storebø, Ole Jakob
Venue
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-04-24
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
172-175
ISSN
  • 1356-5524 (ISSN-L)
  • 2515-446X
  • 2515-4478
OpenAlex
W3020442651
Cited by
13
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand Psychiatry, Denmark
  • Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Keywords
methylphenidate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, WHO Model List of Essential Medicines, psychostimulants, quality of evidence, drug safety, children and adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review