Cited by 84Clinical practice guidelines implementationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and Education

The Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK) guide: developing a clinical decision support tool to simplify, standardise and strengthen primary healthcare delivery

Open access
Cornick, Ruth, Picken, Sandy, Wattrus, Camilla, Awotiwon, Ajibola, Carkeek, Emma, Hannington, Juliet, Spiller, Pearl, Bateman, Eric +3 more·2018·BMJ Global Health

Abstract

For the primary health worker in a low/middle-income country (LMIC) setting, delivering quality primary care is challenging. This is often complicated by clinical guidance that is out of date, inconsistent and informed by evidence from high-income countries that ignores LMIC resource constraints and burden of disease. The Knowledge Translation Unit (KTU) of the University of Cape Town Lung Institute has developed, implemented and evaluated a health systems intervention in South Africa, and localised it to Botswana, Nigeria, Ethiopia and Brazil, that simplifies and standardises the care delivered by primary health workers while strengthening the system in which they work. At the core of this intervention, called Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK), is a clinical decision support tool, the PACK guide. This paper describes the development of the guide over an 18-year period and explains the design features that have addressed what the patient, the clinician and the health system need from clinical guidance, and have made it, in the words of a South African primary care nurse, ‘A tool for every day for every patient’. It describes the lessons learnt during the development process that the KTU now applies to further development, maintenance and in-country localisation of the guide: develop clinical decision support in context first, involve local stakeholders in all stages, leverage others’ evidence databases to remain up to date and ensure content development, updating and localisation articulate with implementation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000962

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite the strong need for interventions to improve peripartum mental health and associated HIV-outcomes, there are still many barriers to routine mental health screening, psychoeducation, and efficient treatment referral pathways in South African antenatal clinics.

    “Despite the strong need for interventions to improve peripartum mental health and associated HIV-outcomes [57], there are still many barriers to routine mental health screening, psychoeducation, and efficient treatment referral pathways in South African antenatal clinics [58].”

    From Exploring the effects of mental health on bonding and caregiving among pregnant and postpartum persons with likely depression and/or PTSD in South Africa: a qualitative analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [58]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. [1]Oni T, Unwin N Why the communicable/non-communicable disease dichotomy is problematic for public health control strategies: implications of multimorbidity for health systems in an era of health transition. Int Health 2015; 7: ihv040– 9. 10.1093/inthealth/ihv040 PMC4638105 26103981 · DOI
  2. [2]Afshar S, Roderick PJ, Kowal P, et al Multimorbidity and the inequalities of global ageing: a cross-sectional study of 28 countries using the World Health Surveys. BMC Public Health 2015; 15: 776 10.1186/s12889-015-2008-7 26268536 PMC4534141 · DOI
  3. [3]Frenk J, Gómez-Dantés O False dichotomies in global health: the need for integrative thinking. Lancet 2017; 389: 667– 70. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30181-7 27771016 · DOI
  4. [4]Machingaidze S, Grimmer K, Louw Q, et al Next generation clinical guidance for primary care in South Africa - credible, consistent and pragmatic. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0195025 10.1371/journal.pone.0195025 29601611 PMC5877861 · DOI
  5. [6]Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, et al GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 380– 2. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011 21185693 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [8]Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction. BMJ 2016; 353: i2016 10.1136/bmj.i2016 27353417 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [9]Michie S, Johnston M Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific. BMJ 2004; 328: 343– 5. 10.1136/bmj.328.7435.343 14764503 PMC338112 · DOI
  8. [10]Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Palda VA, et al How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci 2011; 6: 26 10.1186/1748-5908-6-26 21426574 PMC3072935 · DOI
  9. [12]World Health Organisation. 2016 mhGAP Intervention Guide - Version 2.0 for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings World Health Organisation. http://www.who.int/mental_health/mhgap/mhGAP_intervention_guide_02/en/ 27786430
  10. [13]Vasan A, Ellner A, Lawn SD, et al Strengthening of primary-care delivery in the developing world: IMAI and the need for integrated models of care. Lancet Glob Health 2013; 1: e321– 3. 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70102-5 25104589 · DOI
  11. [14]World Health Organisation. Practical approach to lung health – manual on initiating PAL implementation, 2008. 26269870
  12. [15]English RG, Bateman ED, Zwarenstein MF, et al Development of a South African integrated syndromic respiratory disease guideline for primary care. Prim Care Respir J 2008; 17: 156– 63. 10.3132/pcrj.2008.00044 18701971 PMC6619891 · DOI
  13. [16]Fairall L, Bateman E, Cornick R, et al Innovating to improve primary care in less developed countries: towards a global model. BMJ Innov 2015; 1: 196– 203. 10.1136/bmjinnov-2015-000045 PMC4680195 26692199 · DOI
  14. [18]Tsima BM, Setlhare V, Nkomazana O Developing the Botswana Primary Care Guideline: an integrated, symptom-based primary care guideline for the adult patient in a resource-limited setting. J Multidiscip Healthc 2016; 9: 347– 54. 10.2147/JMDH.S112466 27570457 PMC4986912 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [19]Wattrus C, Zepeda J, Cornick R, et al Using a mentorship model to localise the Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK): from South Africa to Brazil. BMJ Global Health 2018 In press. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001016. PMC6231100 30483415 · DOI
  16. [20]Fairall LR, Zwarenstein M, Bateman ED, et al Effect of educational outreach to nurses on tuberculosis case detection and primary care of respiratory illness: pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005; 331: 750– 4. 10.1136/bmj.331.7519.750 16195293 PMC1239979 · DOI
  17. [24]Stein J, Lewin S, Fairall L, et al Building capacity for antiretroviral delivery in South Africa: a qualitative evaluation of the PALSA PLUS nurse training programme. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 240 10.1186/1472-6963-8-240 19017394 PMC2613903 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [25]Georgeu D, Colvin CJ, Lewin S, et al Implementing nurse-initiated and managed antiretroviral treatment (NIMART) in South Africa: a qualitative process evaluation of the STRETCH trial. Implement Sci 2012; 7: 66 10.1186/1748-5908-7-66 22800379 PMC3464669 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [29]PACK website. Available from: http://pack.bmj.com/
  20. [31]Fauci A, Braunwald E Harrison’s Principles of internal medicine. 14th edn: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
  21. [33]Mash B, Fairall L, Adejayan O, et al A morbidity survey of South African primary care. PLoS One 2012; 7: e32358 10.1371/journal.pone.0032358 22442666 PMC3306367 · DOI
  22. [34]Cornick R, Eastman T, Wattrus C Crossing borders: the PACK experience of disseminating a complex health system intervention across low and middle-income countries. BMJ Global Health 2018 In press. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001088. 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001088 PMC6231097 30483416 · DOI
  23. [35]Horton R Offline: The tasks facing Dr Tedros. Lancet 2017; 390: 2538 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33137-9 29231826 · DOI
  24. [36]Seedat YK, Rayner BL, Veriava Y. Hypertension guideline working group South African hypertension practice guideline 2014. Cardiovasc J Afr 2014; 25: 288– 94. 10.5830/CVJA-2014-062 25629715 PMC4327181 · DOI
  25. [38]Elwyn G, Wieringa S, Greenhalgh T Clinical encounters in the post-guidelines era. BMJ 2016; 353: i3200 10.1136/bmj.i3200 27352795 · DOI
  26. [39]Picken S, Hannington J, Richards M, et al PACK Child: a practical guide to expand integrated paediatric primary care. BMJ Global Health 2018. In press. PMC6203049 30397519
  27. [40]Murdoch J, Curran R, Bachmann M, et al Strengthening the quality of paediatric primary care in South Africa: protocol for process evaluation of a pilot and feasibility study of a health systems intervention. BMJ Global Health 2018 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000945 PMC6203013 30397518 · DOI
  28. [41]Somannavar S, Ganesan A, Deepa M, et al Random capillary blood glucose cut points for diabetes and pre-diabetes derived from community-based opportunistic screening in India. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 641– 3. 10.2337/dc08-0403 19073758 PMC2660445 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cornick, R., Picken, S., Wattrus, C., Awotiwon, A., Carkeek, E., Hannington, J., Spiller, P., Bateman, E., Doherty, T., Zwarenstein, M., & Fairall, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Knowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Cornick, Ruth
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-10
Volume
3
Issue
Suppl 5
Pages
e000962
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896623191
Cited by
84
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute for Global Health Activities in Developing Countries to Combat Non- Communicable Chronic Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases
  • Peter Sowerby Charitable Foundation
  • Stellenbosch University Rural Medical Education Partnership Initiative
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
clinical decision support systems, primary health workers, primary care delivery, low-middle income countries, clinical guideline development, knowledge translation, health system strengthening, resource-limited settings, stakeholder engagement, evidence database

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review