PreprintCited by 84Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealthcare Systems and PracticesHealthcare Systems and Reforms

HeAlth System StrEngThening in four sub_Saharan African countries (ASSET) to achieve high-quality, evidence-informed surgical, maternal and newborn, and primary care: protocol for pre-implementation phase studies

Open access
Seward, Nadine, Hanlon, Charlotte, Abdulahi, Ahmed, Abrams, Zulfa, Alem, Atalay, Araya, Ricardo, Bachmann, Max, Bogale, Birke +27 more·2021·Global Health Action

Abstract

Objectives: To achieve universal health coverage, health systems need to be strengthened to support the consistent delivery of high-quality, evidence-informed care at scale. The aim of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Global Research Unit on He A lth S ystem S tr E ng T hening in Sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET) is to address this need in a four-year programme spanning three healthcare platforms (primary health care for the integrated treatment of chronic conditions in adults, maternal and newborn, surgical care) involving eight work packages. This paper describes the pre-implementation phase research protocols that assess: (1) barriers to accessing care; (2) health system bottlenecks in care process and pathways; (3) quality of care, and; (4) people centredness. Findings from this research are used to engage stakeholders and to inform the selection of a set of health system strengthening interventions (HSSIs) and subsequent methodology for evaluation. Settings: Publicly funded health systems in rural and urban areas in Ethiopia, Sierra Leone, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. Population: Stakeholders including patients and their caregivers, community representatives, clinicians, managers, administrators, and policymakers. Study methodologies and delivery: In each work package, we apply a mixed-methods approach, including: literature reviews; situation analyses; cohort studies; cross-sectional surveys; ethnographic observations; semi-structured interviews, and; focus group discussions. At the end of the pre-implementation phase, findings are fed back to stakeholders in participatory theory of change workshops that are used to select/adapt an initial set of contextually relevant HSSIs. To ensure a theory-informed approach across ASSET, implementation science determinant frameworks are also applied, to help identify any additional contextual barriers and enablers and complementary HSSIs. Outputs from these activities are used to finalise underlying assumptions, potential unintended consequences, process indicators and implementation and clinical outcomes. Conclusions: ASSET places a strong emphasis of the pre-implementation phase of the programme in order to provide an in-depth and systematic diagnosis of the existing heath system functioning, needs for strengthening and active stakeholder engagement. This approach will inform the design and evaluation of the HSSIs to increase effectiveness across work packages and contexts, to better understand what works, for whom, and how. Strengths and limitations of this study: The National Health Institute of Research (NIHR) Global Research Unit on Health System Strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET) is a four-year programme (2017-2021) that is closely aligned with the SDG goal of UHC, and the recommendations of the Lancet Commission for High Quality Health Systems. The aim of ASSET is to develop and evaluate effective and sustainable HSSIs, promoting consistent delivery of high-quality, people-centred care. The ASSET programme is being conducted in two phases including the diagnostic pre-implementation and piloting/rolling implementation phase. The purpose of this paper is to describe the methodology for the pre-implementation phase, which has the core aim of mapping comprehensive care pathways of a patient’s journey though the health system including the community, different providers), and health facilities, documenting what care is provided at what level of the health system and the associated health system bottlenecks. At the end of the pre-implementation phase of ASSET, it is hoped the common approach taken across different countries, care platforms and health conditions will facilitate cross platform learning and understanding of how differences in health systems and broader contextual influences shaped the development of the interventions. The overarching expectation is that by using an in-depth participatory process to engage with the stakeholders and map care pathways to and through the health system, we develop a HSS programme that can be implemented at scale that meets the needs and priorities of the local community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.01.06.20248468

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Seward N, Hanlon C, Abdulahi A, et al. HeAlth System StrEngThening in four sub_Saharan African countries (ASSET) to achieve high-quality, evidence-informed surgical, maternal and newborn, and primary care: protocol for pre-implementation phase studies. medRxiv. 2021 Jan 06; 20248468. DOI: 10.1101/2021.01.06.20248468. PMC8765245 35037844

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seward, N., Hanlon, C., Abdulahi, A., Abrams, Z., Alem, A., Araya, R., Bachmann, M., Bogale, B., Brima, N., Chibanda, D., Curran, R., Davis, J., Deneke, A., Fairall, L., Frissa, S., Gallagher, J., Gao, W., Harding, R., Kartha, M. R., Leather, A., Lund, C., Marx, M., Nkhoma, K., Murdoch, J., Petersen, I., Petrus, R., Sandall, J., Sheenan, A., Tadesse, A., Thornicroft, G., van Rensburg, A., Sevdalis, N., Verhey, R., Willot, C., & Prince, M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Addis Ababa University (ET)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • University of Zimbabwe (ZW)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Corresponding author
Seward, Nadine
Venue
Global Health Action
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-01-09
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
1987044-1987044
ISSN
1654-9716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225679594
Cited by
84
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
16.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Global Health Action (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Government of the United Kingdom
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (16/136/54, GHRU 16/136/54)
  • Department of Health and Social Care (16/136/54)
  • King's College London (GHRU 16/136/54)
  • National Institutes of Health (R023697, S001255, MR/S001255/1)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/S001255/1, MR/R023697/1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH100470)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Keywords
health system strengthening, participatory research, stakeholder engagement, co-production, theory of change, situation analysis, universal health coverage, surgical care, maternal and newborn care, primary care, sub-Saharan Africa
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Delivery of Health Care, Government Programs, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Medical Assistance, Primary Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review