Cited by 77HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyHealth Policy Implementation Science

Outreach education for integration of HIV/AIDS care, antiretroviral treatment, and tuberculosis care in primary care clinics in South Africa: PALSA PLUS pragmatic cluster randomised trial

Open access
Zwarenstein, M., Fairall, L. R., Lombard, C., Mayers, P., Bheekie, A., English, R. G., Lewin, S., Bachmann, M. O. +1 more·2011·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether PALSA PLUS, an on-site educational outreach programme of non-didactic, case based, iterative clinical education of staff, led by a trainer, can increase access to and comprehensiveness of care for patients with HIV/AIDS. DESIGN: Cluster randomised trial. SETTING: Public primary care clinics offering HIV/AIDS care, antiretroviral treatment (ART), tuberculosis care, and ambulatory primary care in Free State province, South Africa. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen clinics all implementing decentralisation and task shifting were randomised. The clinics cared for 400,000 general primary care patients and 10,136 patients in an HIV/AIDS/ART programme. There were 150 nurses. INTERVENTION: On-site outreach education in eight clinics; no such education in seven (control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Provision of co-trimoxazole prophylaxis among patients referred to the HIV/AIDS/ART programme, and detection of cases of tuberculosis among those in the programme. Proportion of patients in the programme enrolled through general primary care consultations. RESULTS: Patients referred to the HIV/AIDS programme through general primary care at intervention clinics were more likely than those at control clinics to receive co-trimoxazole prophylaxis (41%, (2253/5523) v 32% (1340/4210); odds ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 3.40), and tuberculosis was more likely to be diagnosed among patients with HIV/AIDS/ART (7% (417/5793) v 6% (245/4343); 1.25, 1.01 to 1.55). Enrolment in the HIV/AIDS and ART programme through HIV testing in general primary care was not significantly increased (53% v 50%; 1.19, 0.51 to 2.77). Secondary outcomes were similar, except for weight gain, which was higher in the intervention group (2.3 kg v 1.9 kg, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Though outreach education is an effective and feasible strategy for improving comprehensiveness of care and wellbeing of patients with HIV/AIDS, there is no evidence that it increases access to the ART programme. It is now being widely implemented in South Africa. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 24820584.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.d2022

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zwarenstein, M., Fairall, L. R., Lombard, C., Mayers, P., Bheekie, A., English, R. G., Lewin, S., Bachmann, M. O., & Bateman, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • University of the Western Cape (ZA)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Zwarenstein, M.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-04-21
Volume
342
Issue
apr21 1
Pages
d2022-d2022
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2116888597
Cited by
77
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • International Development Research Centre
  • University of Cape Town
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
HIV care, antiretroviral therapy, tuberculosis, primary care, educational outreach, clinical teaching, task shifting, decentralization, cotrimoxazole prophylaxis, tuberculosis case detection, HIV care access, nurse training, South Africa
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care, Anti-Infective Agents, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Microbiology, Primary Health Care, South Africa, Tuberculosis, Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination, Cluster Analysis, AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections, Anti-HIV Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review