Cited by 63Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 ChallengesGlobal Security and Public HealthInternational Law and Human Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

COVID-19 travel restrictions and the International Health Regulations (2005)

Open access
von Tigerstrom, Barbara, Wilson, Kumanan·2020·BMJ Global Health

Abstract

► Concerns that have been raised about states violating the International Health Regulations ( 2005) by imposing travel restrictions are valid, and some states have not complied with their obligations under those Regulations.► Given the unprecedented situation and uncertainty about the best course of action, we should not assume that all travel restrictions violate international law, even though they were not recommended by the WHO.► Some travel restrictions are more likely to be justified than others, depending on a number of factors, including how they are designed and local capacity to implement less restrictive measures.► The WHO still has an important role to play in providing guidance to states as they modify or lift travel restrictions.► In order for the international framework to be more effective, the WHO should have more flexibility to make early travel recommendations and develop protocols to facilitate the reopening of borders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002629

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
von Tigerstrom, B., & Wilson, K.
Affiliations
  • College of Law, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • Bruyère (CA)
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-05
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
e002629
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025458062
Cited by
63
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4
FWCI
10.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (NFRF-2019-00013)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Global Security and Public Health
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, travel restrictions, International Health Regulations 2005, international law, World Health Organization, border reopening, state obligations, public health measures, pandemic response
MeSH terms
International Health Regulations, COVID-19, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Travel, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review