The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social media and vaccine hesitancy
Open accessAbstract
Background: Understanding the threat posed by anti-vaccination efforts on social media is critically important with the forth coming need for world wide COVID-19 vaccination programs. We globally evaluate the effect of social media and online foreign disinformation campaigns on vaccination rates and attitudes towards vaccine safety. Methods: We use a large-n cross-country regression framework to evaluate the effect of social media on vaccine hesitancy globally. To do so, we operationalize social media usage in two dimensions: the use of it by the public to organize action (using Digital Society Project indicators), and the level of negatively oriented discourse about vaccines on social media (using a data set of all geocoded tweets in the world from 2018-2019). In addition, we measure the level of foreign-sourced coordinated disinformation operations on social media ineach country (using Digital Society Project indicators). The outcome of vaccine hesitancy is measured in two ways. First, we use polls of what proportion of the public per country feels vaccines are unsafe (using Wellcome Global Monitor indicators for 137 countries). Second, we use annual data of actual vaccination rates from the WHO for 166 countries. Results: We found the use of social media to organise offline action to be highly predictive of the belief that vaccinations are unsafe, with such beliefs mounting as more organisation occurs on social media. In addition, the prevalence of foreign disinformation is highly statistically and substantively significant in predicting a drop in mean vaccination coverage over time. A 1-point shift upwards in the 5-point disinformation scale is associated with a 2-percentage point drop in mean vaccination coverage year over year. We also found support for the connection of foreign disinformation with negative social media activity about vaccination. The substantive effect of foreign disinformation is to increase the number of negative vaccine tweets by 15% for the median country. Conclusion: There is a significant relationship between organisation on social media and public doubts of vaccine safety. In addition, there is a substantial relationship between foreign disinformation campaigns and declining vaccination coverage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants
MacDonald, N. E. (2015) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036 · Cited by 5,573
Mapping vaccine hesitancy-country-specific characteristics of a global phenomenon
Dubé, E., Gagnon, D., Nickels, E., Jeram, S., & Schuster, M. (2014) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.039 · Cited by 544
Cited by
Sallam, M., Dababseh, D., Eid, H., Al-Mahzoum, K., Al-Haidar, A., Taim, D., Yaseen, A., Ababneh, N. A., Bakri, F. G., & Mahafzah, A. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9010042 · Cited by 675
Sun, Y., Sheng, D., Zhou, Z., & Wu, Y. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03811-x · Cited by 327
Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19: could lessons from the past help in divining the future?
Wiysonge, C. S., Ndwandwe, D., Ryan, J., Jaca, A., Batouré, O., Anya, B.-P. M., & Cooper, S. (2022) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2021.1893062 · Cited by 303
Self-citationOnline misinformation is linked to early COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and refusal
Pierri, F., Perry, B. L., DeVerna, M. R., Yang, K.-C., Flammini, A., Menczer, F., & Bryden, J. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10070-w · Cited by 264
Zuboff, S. (2022) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877221129290 · Cited by 209
“…became available, the focus of information corruption shifted to anti-vaccine campaigns, obstructing the most vital public health solutions to the COVID-19 pandemic (Germani & BillerAndorno, 2020; Loomba et al., 2021; Perri et al. v. Robinhood Markets, Inc. et al., 2021; Wilson & Wiysonge, 2020).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, S. L., & Wiysonge, C.
- Venue
- BMJ Global Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e004206
- ISSN
- 2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3093951335
- Cited by
- 972
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 203.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social media and vaccine hesitancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004206
- The paper
- Wilson, S. L., & Wiysonge, C. (2020). Social media and vaccine hesitancy. BMJ Global Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.