ADNEX risk prediction model for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of external validation studies

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works

Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.

Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 · Cited by 26,092 · see citing works

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305 · see citing works

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

Whiting, P. F., Rutjes, A. W. S., Westwood, M. E., Mallett, S., Deeks, J. J., Reitsma, J. B., Leeflang, M. M. G., Sterne, J. A. C., Bossuyt, P. M. M., & the QUADAS-2 Group* (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 · Cited by 14,199 · see citing works

Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models

Vickers, A. J., & Elkin, E. B. (2006) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x06295361 · Cited by 6,341 · see citing works

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement

Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G., & Moons, K. G. M. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g7594 · Cited by 4,388 · see citing works

Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering

Wohlin, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2601248.2601268 · Cited by 4,234 · see citing works

Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews

Reitsma, J. B., Glas, A. S., Rutjes, A. W. S., Scholten, R. J. P. M., Bossuyt, P. M., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022 · Cited by 3,369 · see citing works

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement

Collins, P. G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G., & Moons, K. G. M. (2015) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.639 · Cited by 3,312 · see citing works

Systematic review and critical appraisal of prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 infection

Wynants, L., Van Calster, B., Bonten, M. M., Collins, G. S., Debray, T. P., De Vos, M., Haller, M. C., Heinze, G., Moons, K. G., Riley, R. D., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.03.24.20041020 · Cited by 3,070 · see citing works

How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?

Thompson, S. G., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1187 · Cited by 3,026 · see citing works

PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies

Wolff, R. F., Moons, K. G. M., Riley, R. D., Whiting, P. F., Westwood, M., Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Kleijnen, J., Mallett, S., & for the PROBAST Group† (2019) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-1376 · Cited by 2,984 · see citing works

Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics

On behalf of Topic Group ‘Evaluating diagnostic tests and prediction models’ of the STRATOS initiative, Van Calster, B., McLernon, D. J., van Smeden, M., Wynants, L., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2019) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1466-7 · Cited by 2,650 · see citing works

Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist

Moons, K. G. M., de Groot, J. A. H., Bouwmeester, W., Vergouwe, Y., Mallett, S., Altman, D. G., Reitsma, J. B., & Collins, G. S. (2014) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744 · Cited by 2,018 · see citing works

PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration

Moons, K. G. M., Wolff, R. F., Riley, R. D., Whiting, P. F., Westwood, M., Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Kleijnen, J., & Mallett, S. (2019) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-1377 · Cited by 1,669 · see citing works

Clinical Prediction Models

Steyerberg, E. W. (2009) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77244-8 · Cited by 1,491 · see citing works

Meta-Analysis with R

Schwarzer, G., Carpenter, J. R., & Rücker, G. (2015) · Use R! · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21416-0 · Cited by 1,230 · see citing works

Net benefit approaches to the evaluation of prediction models, molecular markers, and diagnostic tests

Vickers, A. J., Van Calster, B., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i6 · Cited by 1,163 · see citing works

External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting

Collins, G. S., de Groot, J. A., Dutton, S., Omar, O., Shanyinde, M., Tajar, A., Voysey, M., Wharton, R., Yu, L.-M., Moons, K. G., et al. (2014) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-40 · Cited by 729 · see citing works

A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance

Debray, T. P. A., Damen, J. A. A. G., Snell, K. I. E., Ensor, J., Hooft, L., Reitsma, J. B., Riley, R. D., & Moons, K. G. M. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i6460 · Cited by 657 · see citing works

Reporting and Methods in Clinical Prediction Research: A Systematic Review

Bouwmeester, W., Zuithoff, N. P. A., Mallett, S., Geerlings, M. I., Vergouwe, Y., Steyerberg, E. W., Altman, D. G., & Moons, K. G. M. (2012) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001221 · Cited by 600 · see citing works

O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee

Andreotti, R. F., Timmerman, D., Strachowski, L. M., Froyman, W., Benacerraf, B. R., Bennett, G. L., Bourne, T., Brown, D. L., Coleman, B. G., Frates, M. C., et al. (2019) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2019191150 · Cited by 530 · see citing works

Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study

Van Calster, B., Van Hoorde, K., Valentin, L., Testa, A. C., Fischerova, D., Van Holsbeke, C., Savelli, L., Franchi, D., Epstein, E., Kaijser, J., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g5920 · Cited by 510 · see citing works

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review

Andaur Navarro, C. L., Damen, J. A. A., Takada, T., Nijman, S. W. J., Dhiman, P., Ma, J., Collins, G. S., Bajpai, R., Riley, R. D., Moons, K. G. M., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n2281 · Cited by 415 · see citing works

Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome

Riley, R. D., Debray, T. P. A., Collins, G. S., Archer, L., Ensor, J., van Smeden, M., & Snell, K. I. E. (2021) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.9025 · Cited by 400 · see citing works

There is no such thing as a validated prediction model

Van Calster, B., Steyerberg, E. W., Wynants, L., & van Smeden, M. (2023) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-023-02779-w · Cited by 286 · see citing works

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes

Debray, T. P., Damen, J. A., Riley, R. D., Snell, K., Reitsma, J. B., Hooft, L., Collins, G. S., & Moons, K. G. (2019) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280218785504 · Cited by 278 · see citing works

Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and the estimation of between-study correlation

Riley, R. D., Abrams, K. R., Sutton, A. J., Lambert, P. C., & Thompson, J. R. (2007) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-3 · Cited by 243 · see citing works

Predictive analytics in health care: how can we know it works?

Van Calster, B., Wynants, L., Timmerman, D., Steyerberg, E. W., & Collins, G. S. (2019) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocz130 · Cited by 223 · see citing works

Three myths about risk thresholds for prediction models

on behalf of the Topic Group ‘Evaluating diagnostic tests and prediction models’ of the STRATOS initiative, Wynants, L., van Smeden, M., McLernon, D. J., Timmerman, D., Steyerberg, E. W., & Van Calster, B. (2019) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1425-3 · Cited by 213 · see citing works

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)

Snell, K. I. E., Levis, B., Damen, J. A., Dhiman, P., Debray, T. P. A., Hooft, L., Reitsma, J. B., Moons, K. G. M., Collins, P. G. S., & Riley, R. D. (2023) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-073538 · Cited by 210 · see citing works

Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a continuous outcome

Archer, L., Snell, K. I. E., Ensor, J., Hudda, M. T., Collins, G. S., & Riley, R. D. (2021) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.8766 · Cited by 198 · see citing works

Risk of complications in patients with conservatively managed ovarian tumours (IOTA5): a 2-year interim analysis of a multicentre, prospective, cohort study

Froyman, W., Landolfo, C., Campo, B. D. C., Wynants, L., Sladkevicius, P., Testa, A. C., Holsbeke, C. V., Domali, E., Fruscio, R., Epstein, E., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30837-4 · Cited by 192 · see citing works

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model using multinomial logistic regression

Pate, A., Riley, R. D., Collins, P. G. S., van Smeden, M., CALSTER, B. V., Ensor, J., & Martin, G. P. (2023) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/09622802231151220 · Cited by 172 · see citing works

Risk scores to guide referral decisions for people with suspected ovarian cancer in secondary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

Westwood, M. E., Ramaekers, B. L. T., Lang, S., Grimm, S. E., Deshpande, S., de Kock, S., Armstrong, N., Joore, M. A., & Kleijnen, J. (2018) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta22440 · Cited by 159 · see citing works

Using Relative Utility Curves to Evaluate Risk Prediction

Baker, S. G., Cook, N. R., Vickers, A., & Kramer, B. S. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2009.00592.x · Cited by 142 · see citing works

Hidden in plain sight: bias towards sick patients when sampling patients with sufficient electronic health record data for research

Rusanov, A., Weiskopf, N. G., Wang, S., & Weng, C. (2014) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-14-51 · Cited by 137 · see citing works

Centralisation of services for gynaecological cancers — A Cochrane systematic review

Woo, Y. L., Kyrgiou, M., Bryant, A., Everett, T. R., & Dickinson, H. O. (2012) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.04.012 · Cited by 133 · see citing works

Validation of models to diagnose ovarian cancer in patients managed surgically or conservatively: multicentre cohort study

CALSTER, B. V., Valentin, L., Froyman, W., Landolfo, C., Ceusters, J., Testa, A. C., Wynants, L., Sladkevicius, P., Holsbeke, C. V., Domali, E., et al. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m2614 · Cited by 128 · see citing works

External validation of clinical prediction models: simulation-based sample size calculations were more reliable than rules-of-thumb

Snell, K. I. E., Archer, L., Ensor, J., Bonnett, L. J., Debray, T. P. A., Phillips, B., Collins, P. G. S., & Riley, R. D. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.011 · Cited by 125 · see citing works

<scp>ESGO</scp>/<scp>ISUOG</scp>/<scp>IOTA</scp>/<scp>ESGE</scp> Consensus Statement on preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors

Timmerman, D., Planchamp, F., Bourne, T., Landolfo, C., du Bois, A., Chiva, L., Cibula, D., Concin, N., Fischerova, D., Froyman, W., et al. (2021) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.23635 · Cited by 114 · see citing works

Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods

Meys, E. M. J., Jeelof, L. S., Achten, N. M. J., Slangen, B. F. M., Lambrechts, S., Kruitwagen, R. F. P. M., & Gorp, T. V. (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.17225 · Cited by 111 · see citing works

Network Meta-Analysis

Schwarzer, G., Carpenter, J. R., & Rücker, G. (2015) · Use R! · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21416-0_8 · Cited by 109 · see citing works

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved

Dhiman, P., Ma, J., Navarro, C. L. A., Speich, B., Bullock, G. S., Damen, J. A., Kirtley, S., Hooft, L., Riley, R. D., CALSTER, B. V., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.024 · Cited by 109 · see citing works

Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O‐RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women

Hiett, A. K., Sonek, J., Guy, M. S., & Reid, T. J. A. (2021) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.24777 · Cited by 105 · see citing works

Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model: a multicentre external validation study

Sayasneh, A., Ferrara, L., Cock, B. D., Saso, S., Al‐Memar, M., Johnson, S., Kaijser, J., Carvalho, J., Husicka, R., Smith, A. A., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2016.227 · Cited by 100 · see citing works

Imputation and missing indicators for handling missing data in the development and deployment of clinical prediction models: A simulation study

Sisk, R., Sperrin, M., Peek, N., van Smeden, M., & Martin, G. P. (2023) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/09622802231165001 · Cited by 99 · see citing works

Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories

CALSTER, B. V., Vergouwe, Y., Looman, C. W. N., Belle, V. V., Timmerman, D., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2012) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-012-9733-3 · Cited by 92 · see citing works

Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and ROC Curves with Covariate Adjusted Semiparametric Mixtures

Doebler, P., & Holling, H. (2014) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-014-9430-0 · Cited by 88 · see citing works

External Validation of O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System

Hack, K., Gandhi, N., Bouchard‐Fortier, G., Chawla, T. P., Ferguson, S. E., Li, S., Kahn, D., Tyrrell, P. N., & Glanc, P. (2022) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.211868 · Cited by 80 · see citing works

Putting Risk Prediction in Perspective: Relative Utility Curves

Baker, S. G. (2009) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djp353 · Cited by 79 · see citing works

Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center

Araújo, K. G., Jales, R. M., Pereira, P. N., Yoshida, A., Andrade, L. A. L. D. A., Sarian, L. O., & Derchain, S. (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.15963 · Cited by 73 · see citing works

Assessing calibration of multinomial risk prediction models

Hoorde, K. V., Vergouwe, Y., Timmerman, D., Huffel, S. V., Steyerberg, E. W., & CALSTER, B. V. (2014) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6114 · Cited by 65 · see citing works

Benign descriptors and ADNEX in two‐step strategy to estimate risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors: retrospective validation in IOTA5 multicenter cohort

Landolfo, C., Bourne, T., Froyman, W., CALSTER, B. V., Ceusters, J., Testa, A. C., Wynants, L., Sladkevicius, P., Holsbeke, C. V., Domali, E., et al. (2022) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.26080 · Cited by 63 · see citing works

Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China

Chen, H., Qian, L., Jiang, M., Du, Q., Yuan, F., & Feng, W. (2019) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.20363 · Cited by 54 · see citing works

External validation of the IOTA ADNEX model performed by two independent gynecologic centers

Szubert, S., Wójtowicz, A., Moszyński, R., Żywica, P., Dyczkowski, K., Stachowiak, A., Sajdak, S., Szpurek, D., & Alcázar, J. L. (2016) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.06.020 · Cited by 53 · see citing works

Clinical Utility of Risk Models to Refer Patients with Adnexal Masses to Specialized Oncology Care: Multicenter External Validation Using Decision Curve Analysis

Wynants, L., Timmerman, D., Verbakel, J. Y. J., Testa, A. C., Savelli, L., Fischerová, D., Franchi, D., Holsbeke, C. V., Epstein, E., Froyman, W., et al. (2017) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-3248 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

Subjective ultrasound assessment, the ADNEX model and ultrasound‐guided tru‐cut biopsy to differentiate disseminated primary ovarian cancer from metastatic non‐ovarian cancer

Epstein, E., CALSTER, B. V., Timmerman, D., & Nikman, S. (2015) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.14892 · Cited by 46 · see citing works

Validation of the Performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Methods in the Diagnosis of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer in a Non-Screening Population

Froyman, W., Wynants, L., Landolfo, C., Bourne, T., Valentin, L., Testa, A. C., Sladkevicius, P., Franchi, D., Fischerová, D., Savelli, L., et al. (2017) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics7020032 · Cited by 44 · see citing works

Random‐effects meta‐analysis of the clinical utility of tests and prediction models

Wynants, L., Riley, R. D., Timmerman, D., & CALSTER, B. V. (2018) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.7653 · Cited by 44 · see citing works

Menopausal status, ultrasound and biomarker tests in combination for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in symptomatic women

Davenport, C. F., Rai, N., Sharma, P., Deeks, J. J., Berhane, S., Mallett, S., Saha, P., Champaneria, R., Bayliss, S. E., Snell, K. I. E., et al. (2022) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011964.pub2 · Cited by 43 · see citing works

Laparoscopy versus Laparotomy in the Management of Benign Unilateral Adnexal Masses

Carley, M. E., Klingele, C. J., Gebhart, J. B., et al. (2002) · The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists · doi:10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60411-2 · Cited by 39 · see citing works

The ADNEX model to triage adnexal masses: An external validation study and comparison with the IOTA two-step strategy and subjective assessment by an experienced ultrasound operator

Viora, E., Piovano, E., Poma, C. B., Cotrino, I., Castiglione, A., Cavallero, C., Sciarrone, A., Bastonero, S., Iskra, L., & Zola, P. (2020) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.022 · Cited by 38 · see citing works

Validation of IOTA-ADNEX Model in Discriminating Characteristics of Adnexal Masses: A Comparison with Subjective Assessment

Jeong, S. Y., Park, B. K., Lee, Y.-Y., & Kim, T. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9062010 · Cited by 37 · see citing works

Comparison of the O-RADS and ADNEX models regarding malignancy rate and validity in evaluating adnexal lesions

Chen, G.-Y., Hsu, T., Chan, I., Liu, C., Chao, W., Shih, Y.-C., Jiang, L., Chang, Y., Wang, P., & Chen, Y. (2022) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-022-08803-6 · Cited by 34 · see citing works

Comparison of O‐RADS , GI‐RADS, and ADNEX for Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses: An External Validation Study Conducted by Junior Sonologists

Lai, H.-W., Lyu, G., Kang, Z., Li, L., Zhang, Y., & Huang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/jum.15834 · Cited by 32 · see citing works

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients With Adnexal Masses

Qian, L., Du, Q., Jiang, M., Yuan, F., Chen, H., & Feng, W. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.673722 · Cited by 24 · see citing works

Reliability of IOTA score and ADNEX model in the screening of ovarian malignancy in postmenopausal women

Nohuz, E., Simone, L. D., & Chene, G. (2018) · Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction · doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.04.012 · Cited by 23 · see citing works

Factors associated with misdiagnosis of frozen section of mucinous borderline ovarian tumor

Zhang, W., Jia, S., Xiang, Y., Yang, J., Jia, C., & Leng, J. (2018) · Journal of International Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0300060518795582 · Cited by 22 · see citing works

Preoperative Evaluation of the ADNEX Model for the Prediction of the Ovarian Cancer Risk of Adnexal Masses at Siriraj Hospital

Poonyakanok, V., Tanmahasamut, P., Jaishuen, A., Wongwananuruk, T., Asumpinwong, C., Panichyawat, N., & Chantrapanichkul, P. (2021) · Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation · doi:10.1159/000513517 · Cited by 21 · see citing works

Estimating the risk of malignancy of adnexal masses: validation of the ADNEX model in the hands of nonexpert ultrasonographers in a gynaecological oncology centre in China

He, P., Wang, J., Duan, W., Song, C., Yu, Y., & Wu, Q. (2021) · Journal of Ovarian Research · doi:10.1186/s13048-021-00922-w · Cited by 21 · see citing works

Diagnostic Models Combining Clinical Information, Ultrasound and Biochemical Markers for Ovarian Cancer: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Davenport, C. F., Rai, N., Sharma, P., Deeks, J. J., Berhane, S., Mallett, S., Saha, P., Solanki, R., Bayliss, S. E., Snell, K. I. E., et al. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14153621 · Cited by 21 · see citing works

Sonographic Assessment of Complex Ultrasound Morphology Adnexal Tumors in Pregnant Women with the Use of IOTA Simple Rules Risk and ADNEX Scoring Systems

Czekierdowski, A., Stachowicz, N., Smoleń, A., Kluz, T., Łoziński, T., Miturski, A., & Kraczkowski, J. J. (2021) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics11030414 · Cited by 20 · see citing works

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Value of the Ultrasound ADNEX Model for Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors

Peng, X., Ma, Y., Wang, L., Li, H., Zheng, X., & Liu, Y. (2021) · International Journal of General Medicine · doi:10.2147/ijgm.s328010 · Cited by 20 · see citing works

Comparison of Ultrasound Scores in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses

Pelayo, M., Pelayo‐Delgado, I., Saúco, J. S., Sánchez-Zurdo, J., Abarca-Martínez, L., Corraliza-Galán, V., Martín-Gromaz, C., Pablos-Antona, M. J., Zurita-Calvo, J., & Alcázar, J. L. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13071307 · Cited by 20 · see citing works

External validation of prognostic models to predict stillbirth using International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications ( IPPIC ) Network database: individual participant data meta‐analysis

Allotey, J., Whittle, R., Snell, K. I. E., Smuk, M., Townsend, R., von Dadelszen, P., Heazell, A. E. P., Magee, L. A., Smith, G. C. S., Sandall, J., et al. (2021) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.23757 · Cited by 18 · see citing works

Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study

Stukan, M., Badocha, M., & Ratajczak, K. (2019) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-019-5629-x · Cited by 17 · see citing works

Ovarian sex cord stromal tumours: analysis of the clinical and sonographic characteristics of different histopathologic subtypes

Jiang, M., Le, Q., Yang, B., Yuan, F., & Chen, H. (2021) · Journal of Ovarian Research · doi:10.1186/s13048-021-00805-0 · Cited by 17 · see citing works

Diagnostic Accuracy of the ADNEX Model for Ovarian Cancer at the 15% Cut-Off Value: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Huang, X., Wang, Z., Zhang, M., & Luo, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.684257 · Cited by 17 · see citing works

Diagnostic Accuracies of the Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging ADNEX Scoring Systems For Ovarian Adnexal Mass: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cui, L., Xu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2021.05.029 · Cited by 17 · see citing works

Does poor methodological quality of prediction modeling studies translate to poor model performance? An illustration in traumatic brain injury

Helmrich, I. R., Mikolić, A., Kent, D. M., Lingsma, H. F., Wynants, L., Steyerberg, E. W., & Klaveren, D. V. (2022) · Diagnostic and Prognostic Research · doi:10.1186/s41512-022-00122-0 · Cited by 17 · see citing works

Prédictibilité préopératoire de la malignité des tumeurs ovariennes à partir du score ADNEX et utilisation en pratique clinique

Joyeux, E., Miras, T., Masquin, I., Duglet, P.-E., Astruc, K., & Douvier, S. (2016) · Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité · doi:10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.07.007 · Cited by 16 · see citing works

Performance of IOTA Simple Rules Risks, ADNEX Model, Subjective Assessment Compared to CA125 and HE4 with ROMA Algorithm in Discriminating between Benign, Borderline and Stage I Malignant Adnexal Lesions

Czekierdowski, A., Stachowicz, N., Smoleń, A., et al. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13050885 · Cited by 15 · see citing works

Ultrasound Assessment of Adnexal Pathology: Standardized Methods and Different Levels of Experience

Tavoraitė, I., Kronlachner, L., Opolskiene, G., & Bartkevičienė, D. (2021) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina57070708 · Cited by 14 · see citing works

Value of Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa in the Differential Diagnosis of Malignant Ovarian Tumor and Benign Ovarian Tumor: A Meta-analysis

Yue, X., Zhong, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, C., Chen, X., Wang, S., Hu, J., Hu, J., Wang, C., & Liu, X. (2022) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.02.001 · Cited by 14 · see citing works

Performance of the IOTA ADNEX Model on Selected Group of Patients with Borderline Ovarian Tumours

Gaurilčikas, A., Gedgaudaitė, M., Čižauskas, A., Atstupėnaitė, V., Paškauskas, S., Gaurilcikiene, D., Biržietis, T., Vaitkienė, D., & Nadišauskienė, R. J. (2020) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina56120690 · Cited by 13 · see citing works

Ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian mass for predicting malignancy in pregnant women

Lee, S. J., Kim, Y. H., Lee, M., Ko, H. S., Oh, S., Seol, H., Kim, J. W., Ahn, K. H., Na, S., Seong, W. J., et al. (2021) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.007 · Cited by 13 · see citing works

Two‐Step Strategy for Optimizing the Preoperative Classification of Adnexal Masses in a University Hospital, Using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Models

Esquivel, A. L., Rodríguez, N., Ayala, N., Buriticá, C., Gómez, A., Velandia, A., Rodríguez, N., & Alcázar, J. L. (2021) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/jum.15728 · Cited by 12 · see citing works

Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model combined with HE4 for identifying early-stage ovarian cancer

Yang, S., Tang, J. Y., Rong, Y., Wang, M., Long, J., Chen, C., & Wang, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.949766 · Cited by 12 · see citing works

Comparison of ultrasound−based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study

Hu, Y., Chen, B., Dong, H., Sheng, B., Xiao, Z., Li, J., Tian, W., & Lv, F. (2023) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1101297 · Cited by 12 · see citing works

Preoperative discriminating performance of the IOTA-ADNEX model and comparison with Risk of Malignancy Index: an external validation in a non-gynecologic oncology tertiary center

(2020) · European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology · doi:10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.02.4971 · Cited by 11 · see citing works

Updating for a New Setting

Steyerberg, E. W. (2019) · Statistics for biology and health · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16399-0_20 · Cited by 11 · see citing works

Prospective comparative trial comparing O‐RADS , IOTA ADNEX model, and RMI score for preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses for prediction of ovarian cancer

Poonyakanok, V., Tanmahasamut, P., & Jaishuen, A. (2023) · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · doi:10.1111/jog.15624 · Cited by 10 · see citing works

Ultrasound and Clinical Preoperative Characteristics for Discrimination Between Ovarian Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Primary Ovarian Cancer: A Case-Control Study

Stukan, M., Alcázar, J. L., Gębicki, J., Epstein, E., Liro, M., Sufliarska, A., Szubert, S., Guerriero, S., Braicu, E. I., Szajewski, M., et al. (2019) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics9040210 · Cited by 9 · see citing works

Comparison of Ultrasound and Tumor Marker CA125 in Diagnosis of Adnexal Mass Malignancies

Behnamfar, F., Esmaeilian, F., Adibi, A., & Rouholamin, S. (2022) · Advanced Biomedical Research · doi:10.4103/abr.abr_164_20 · Cited by 9 · see citing works

Performance of Selected Models for Predicting Malignancy in Ovarian Tumors in Relation to the Degree of Diagnostic Uncertainty by Subjective Assessment With Ultrasound

Szubert, S., Szpurek, D., Wójtowicz, A., Żywica, P., Stukan, M., Sajdak, S., Jabłoński, S., Wicherek, Ł., & Moszyński, R. (2019) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/jum.15178 · Cited by 8 · see citing works

Assessment of different NEoplasias in the adneXa model for differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses in Korean women

Nam, G. E., Lee, S. R., Jeong, K., Kim, S. H., Moon, H. S., & Chae, H. D. (2021) · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science · doi:10.5468/ogs.21012 · Cited by 8 · see citing works

Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients with Adnexal Masses

Velayo, C. L., Reforma, K. N., Sicam, R. V. G., Diwa, M. H., Sy, A. D. R., & Tantengco, O. A. G. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11010008 · Cited by 8 · see citing works

Evaluating the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: validation of O-RADS and comparison with ADNEX model, SA, and RMI

Wang, R., & Yang, Z. (2023) · Ginekologia Polska · doi:10.5603/gp.a2023.0019 · Cited by 8 · see citing works

Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model for Predicting Malignancy in Women with Ovarian Tumors: A Prospective Cohort Study

Rashmi, N., Singh, S., Begüm, J., & Sable, M. (2023) · Women s Health Reports · doi:10.1089/whr.2022.0072 · Cited by 6 · see citing works

ADNEX Model-Based Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer Using MRI Images

Liu, B., Liao, J., Gu, W., et al. (2021) · Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1155/2021/2146578 · Cited by 5 · see citing works

Ovarian Masses-Applicable IOTA ADNEX Model versus Morphological Findings for Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment

Buţureanu, T., Socolov, D. G., Matasariu, D. R., Ursache, A., Apetrei, A.-M., Dumitraşcu, I., Vasilache, I.-A., Rudisteanu, D., Boiculese, V. L., & Lozneanu, L. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app112210789 · Cited by 5 · see citing works

The Optimal Cut-Off Point of the Andex Model for the Prediction of the Ovarian Cancer Risk

Huong, L. L., Dung, N. T. P., Lam, V. H., et al. (2022) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.31557/apjcp.2022.23.8.2713 · Cited by 5 · see citing works

Adneksiyal kitlelerde Risk of Malignancy Index versiyonları ile Assesment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa (ADNEX) skorlama sisteminin karşılaştırılması

Sandal, K., Polat, M., Yassa, M., Günay, T., Erdem, G., & Güzin, K. (2018) · Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni · doi:10.16948/zktipb.445755 · Cited by 4 · see citing works

Surgery of Benign Ovarian Masses by a Gynecological Cancer Surgeon: A Cohort Study in a Tertiary Cancer Centre

Quaranta, M., Nath, R., Mehra, G., Diab, Y. M. S. K., & Sayasneh, A. (2020) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.9201 · Cited by 4 · see citing works

Comparison of performance between O-RADS, IOTA simple rules risk assessment and ADNEX model in the discrimination of ovarian Brenner tumors

Shang, J., Lei, T., Wu, L., Lin, M., & Xie, H. (2023) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-022-06903-8 · Cited by 4 · see citing works

Response to letter to the editor concerning validation of IOTA ADNEX model

Szubert, S., Wójtowicz, A., & Żywica, P. (2016) · Gynecologic Oncology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.gore.2016.10.009 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

External Validation of the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model Performance in Evaluating the Risk of Ovarian Carcinoma Before Surgery in China: A Tertiary Center Study

Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., & Feng, L. (2021) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/jum.15920 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

The ADNEX risk prediction model for ovarian cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validation studies

(2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.07.12.23291935 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

Skor assessment of different neoplasias in the adnexa (ADNEX) untuk memprediksi keganasan ovarium di RSUP Sanglah Denpasar

Budiana, I. N. G., Suwiyoga, K., Suwardewa, T. G. A., et al. (2022) · Intisari Sains Medis · doi:10.15562/ism.v13i1.1328 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

Evaluation of performance measures in predictive artificial intelligence models to support medical decisions: overview and guidance

Van Calster, B., Collins, G. S., Vickers, A. J., Wynants, L., Kerr, K. F., Barreñada, L., Varoquaux, G., Singh, K., Moons, K. G., Hernandez-Boussard, T., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/j.landig.2025.100916 · Cited by 112 · see citing works

P value–driven methods were underpowered to detect publication bias: analysis of Cochrane review meta-analyses

Furuya‐Kanamori, L., Xu, C., Lin, L., Doan, T. T., Chu, H., Thalib, L., & Doi, S. A. R. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.011 · Cited by 122 · see citing works

Increased carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT) levels in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM): A meta-analysis

Sun, Y., Cai, Y., Li, H., et al. (2015) · Journal of Diabetes and its Complications · doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.03.018 · Cited by 25 · see citing works

Epstein-Barr virus infection and oral squamous cell carcinoma risk: A meta-analysis

She, Y., Nong, X., Zhang, M., & Wang, M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186860 · Cited by 88 · see citing works

Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis

van Aert, R. C. M., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215052 · Cited by 345 · see citing works

Circulating visfatin levels and cancers risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Mohammadi, M., Mianabadi, F., & Mehrad‐Majd, H. (2018) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.27302 · Cited by 47 · see citing works