Cited by 11Workplace Health and Well-beingEmployment and Welfare StudiesHealth disparities and outcomes

Changes in Economic Difficulties and Subsequent Sickness Absence: A Prospective Register-Linkage Study

Open access
Lallukka, Tea, Lahelma, Eero, Rahkonen, Ossi·2013·BMJ Open

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: People's economic difficulties are associated with their health, but consequences of changes in economic difficulties are less understood. We aimed to examine the associations between changes in economic difficulties and subsequent sickness absence while considering socioeconomic circumstances and other covariates. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING: Helsinki, Finland. PARTICIPANTS: Municipal employees of the City of Helsinki, Finland (n=3859), who were respondents to the baseline (2000-2002) and follow-up (2007) questionnaire surveys and had register-based follow-up data on sickness absence until the end of 2010. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-certified short (1-3 days) and medically certified intermediate (4-14 days) and long (15+ days) sickness absence spells were examined using employer's personnel register data. RESULTS: Persistent frequent economic difficulties predicted short (rate ratios (RR) 1.66 95% CI 1.49 to 1.86), intermediate (RR 2.13 95% CI 1.85 to 2.45) and long (RR 2.18 95% CI 1.75 to 2.70) sickness absence spells. Increasing economic difficulties similarly predicted sickness absence spells. The risks were somewhat stronger the longer the absence, and remained although attenuated somewhat after full adjustment. Weak risks were found also for persistent occasional economic difficulties and decreasing economic difficulties, and they attenuated further after full adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in economic difficulties predict subsequent sickness absence even after considering income, baseline health and other covariates. Thus economic difficulties should be considered when addressing causes of sickness absence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002212

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lallukka, T., Lahelma, E., & Rahkonen, O.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Lallukka, Tea
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
e002212
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988785702
Cited by
11
References
43
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Finland (1129225, 1257362, 1135630)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
economic problems, sick leave, socioeconomic conditions, municipal employees, income, health disparities, short-term sickness absence, long-term sickness absence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review