Cited by 26Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationHealth Policy Implementation SciencePediatric Pain Management Techniques

Pain management for chronic musculoskeletal conditions: the development of an evidence-based and theory-informed pain self-management course

Open access
Carnes, Dawn, Homer, Kate, Underwood, Martin, Pincus, Tamar, Rahman, Anisur, Taylor, Stephanie J C·2013·BMJ Open

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To devise and test a self-management course for chronic pain patients based on evidence and underpinned by theory using the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for developing complex interventions. DESIGN: We used a mixed method approach. We conducted a systematic review of the effectiveness of components and characteristics of pain management courses. We then interviewed chronic pain patients who had attended pain and self-management courses. Behavioural change theories were mapped onto our findings and used to design the intervention. We then conducted a feasibility study to test the intervention. SETTING: Primary care in the inner city of London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (18 years or older) with chronic musculoskeletal pain. OUTCOMES: Related disability, quality of life, coping, depression, anxiety, social integration and healthcare resource use. RESULTS: The systematic reviews indicated that group-based courses with joint lay and healthcare professional leadership and that included a psychological component of short duration (<8 weeks) showed considerable promise. The qualitative research indicated that participants liked relaxation, valued social interaction and course location, and that timing and good tutoring were important determinants of attendance. We used behavioural change theories (social learning theory and cognitive behaviour approaches (CBA)) to inform course content. The course addressed: understanding and accepting pain, mood and pain, unhelpful thoughts and behaviour, problem solving, goal setting, action planning, movement, relaxation and social integration/reactivation. Attendance was 85%; we modified the recruitment of patients, the course and the training of facilitators as a result of testing. CONCLUSIONS: The MRC guidelines were helpful in developing this intervention. It was possible to train both lay and non-psychologists to facilitate the courses and deliver CBA. The course was feasible and well received.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003534

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Supportive self-management approaches are well established in the management of several chronic painful disorders, but this is not the case for chronic headache disorders.

    “Supportive self-management approaches are well established in the management of several chronic painful disorders, but this is not the case for chronic headache disorders.15–17”

    From Usual care and a self-management support programme versus usual care and a relaxation programme for people living with chronic headache disorders: A randomised controlled trial protocol (CHESS) (2020) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Introduction describes self-management courses as an approach used for chronic musculoskeletal pain and notes investment in such programmes. It also calls the evidence of effectiveness equivocal, so it does not establish their benefits; nor does the paper address whether supportive self-management is established for chronic headache disorders (searched: headache, migraine). (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies of this nature have reported that a usual care control arm was not an incentive to join the study.

    “Previous studies of this nature have reported that a usual care control arm was not an incentive to join the study.15”

    From Usual care and a self-management support programme versus usual care and a relaxation programme for people living with chronic headache disorders: A randomised controlled trial protocol (CHESS) (2020) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Results section reports difficult recruitment and suggests participation might be higher outside a research study, but does not link this to a usual-care control arm. The Phase III methods describe an uncontrolled pilot; the paper’s mention of usual care concerns treatment effectiveness, not an incentive to join. Searches for a usual-care control arm and recruitment incentives found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • 17 of the 27 included studies used the MRC 2000 framework, the updated 2008 version, or a combination of the two.

    “In particular, 17 of the 27 studies included in this review used the MRC 2000 framework, the updated 2008 version or a combination of the two [24–40].”
  • A number of included studies adopted quantitative methods such as fractional factorial experiments, economic modelling, small uncontrolled pilot studies (with no control group), experimental 2×2 randomised controlled trials, probability models and evaluation questionnaires.

    “A number of studies adopted quantitative methods such as fractional factorial experiments [10, 44], economic modelling [33], small uncontrolled pilot studies (with no control group) [25, 29, 38], experimental 2 × 2 randomised controlled trials [45, 46], probability models [49, 50] and evaluation questionnaires [43].”
  • The majority of included studies (n = 16) subsequently refined the intervention to then test the optimised version within pilot studies or full-scale RCTs.

    “The majority of studies (n = 16) subsequently refined the intervention to then test the optimised version of the intervention within pilot studies or full-scale RCTs [24–32, 34, 38–40, 43, 47, 48].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [15]Upton G Cook I Oxford dictionary of statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002
  2. [18]Beck JS Cognitive therapy. The Guildford Press, 1995
  3. [22]Ajzen I Fishbein M Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research (Addison-Wesley series in social psychology). Longman Higher Education, 1976

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carnes, D., Homer, K., Underwood, M., Pincus, T., Rahman, A., & Taylor, S. J. C.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Carnes, Dawn
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-11
Volume
3
Issue
11
Pages
e003534
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155087785
Cited by
26
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0707-10189, NF-SI-0512-10103)
  • Programme Grants for Applied Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
chronic musculoskeletal pain, pain self-management, behaviour change theory, social learning theory, cognitive-behavioral approach, MRC framework for complex interventions, feasibility, group intervention, relaxation, social integration, coping, anxiety and depression, health care utilization, quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review