Cited by 25Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

Statin use in adults at high risk of cardiovascular disease mortality: cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the irish longitudinal study on ageing (TILDA)

Open access
Murphy, Catriona, Bennett, Kathleen, Fahey, Tom, Shelley, Emer, Graham, Ian, Kenny, Rose Anne·2015·BMJ Open

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the extent to which statins are used by adults at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to European clinical guidelines. The high-risk groups examined are those with (1) known CVD, (2) known diabetes and (3) a high or very high risk (≥5%) of CVD mortality based on Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE). DESIGN: This study is cross-sectional in design using data from the first wave (2009-2011) of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The sample (n=3372) is representative of community living adults aged 50-64 years in Ireland. RESULTS: Statins were used by 68.6% (95% CI 61.5% to 75.8%) of those with known CVD, 57.4% (95% CI 49.1% to 65.7%) of those with known diabetes and by 19.7% (95% CI 13.0% to 26.3%) of adults with a SCORE risk ≥5%. Over a third (38.5%, 95% CI 31.0% to 46.0%) of those with known CVD, 46.8% (95% CI 38.4% to 55.1%) of those with known diabetes and 85.2% (95% CI 79.3% to 91.1%) of those with a SCORE risk ≥5% were at or above the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of 2.5 mmol/L specified in the 2007 European guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Despite strong evidence and clinical guidelines recommending the use of statins for secondary prevention, a gap exists between guidelines and practice in this cohort. It is also of concern that a low proportion of adults with a SCORE risk ≥5% were taking statins. A policy response that strengthens secondary prevention, and improves risk assessment and shared decision-making in the primary prevention of CVD is required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008017

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [14]Whelan BJ RANSAM: a national random sampling design for Ireland. Econ Soc Rev 1979; 10: 169– 74.
  2. [22]Mindell J, Craig R, eds. Health survey of England 2011: health, social care and lifestyles, chapter 2 cardiovascular disease. NatCen Social Research, 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, C., Bennett, K., Fahey, T., Shelley, E., Graham, I., & Kenny, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Medical Gerontology, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
  • Health Service Executive (IE)
  • Tallaght University Hospital (IE)
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-07
Volume
5
Issue
7
Pages
e008017
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1905965048
Cited by
25
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Research Board (HRC-2014-1)
  • Irish Heart Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
statin use, cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk, SCORE risk assessment, diabetes mellitus, LDL cholesterol targets, secondary prevention, guideline adherence, primary prevention, shared decision-making, older adults, Ireland
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Ireland, Cholesterol, LDL, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Guideline Adherence, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review