Cited by 21Family Caregiving in Mental IllnessMedication Adherence and ComplianceSchizophrenia research and treatment

Lay health supporters aided by a mobile phone messaging system to improve care of villagers with schizophrenia in Liuyang, China: protocol for a randomised control trial

Open access
Xu, Dong (Roman), Gong, Wenjie, Caine, Eric D, Xiao, Shuiyuan, Hughes, James P, Ng, Marie, Simoni, Jane, He, Hua +3 more·2016·BMJ Open

Abstract

Introduction: Schizophrenia is a severe, chronic and disabling mental illness. Non-adherence to medication and relapse may lead to poorer patient function. This randomised controlled study, under the acronym LEAN (Lay health supporter, e-platform, award, and iNtegration), is designed to improve medication adherence and high relapse among people with schizophrenia in resource poor settings. Methods/analysis: The community-based LEAN has four parts: (1) L ay health supporters (LHSs), mostly family members who will help supervise patient medication, monitor relapse and side effects, and facilitate access to care, (2) an E -platform to support two-way mobile text and voice messaging to remind patients to take medication; and alert LHSs when patients are non-adherent, (3) an A ward system to motivate patients and strengthen LHS support, and (4) iNtegration of the efforts of patients and LHSs with those of village doctors, township mental health administrators and psychiatrists via the e-platform. A random sample of 258 villagers with schizophrenia will be drawn from the schizophrenic ‘686’ Program registry for the 9 Xiang dialect towns of the Liuyang municipality in China. The sample will be further randomised into a control group and a treatment group of equal sizes, and each group will be followed for 6 months after launch of the intervention. The primary outcome will be medication adherence as measured by pill counts and supplemented by pharmacy records. Other outcomes include symptoms and level of function. Outcomes will be assessed primarily when patients present for medication refill visits scheduled every 2 months over the 6-month follow-up period. Data from the study will be analysed using analysis of covariance for the programme effect and an intent-to-treat approach. Ethics and dissemination: University of Washington: 49464 G; Central South University: CTXY-150002-6. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals with deidentified data made available on FigShare. Trial registration number: ChiCTR-ICR-15006053; Pre-results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010120

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Dongming S, Jiyue H, Wenjun Z The development of community based mental health services in Liuyang. Chinese Mental Health J 2011; 25: 517– 20.

Cited by

Authors
Xu, D. (., Gong, W., Caine, E. D., Xiao, S., Hughes, J. P., Ng, M., Simoni, J., He, H., Smith, K. L., Brown, H. S., & Gloyd, S.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Central South University (CN)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living (US)
Corresponding author
Gong, Wenjie
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
e010120
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2287633326
Cited by
21
References
35
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Sun Yat-sen University
  • Fogarty International Center (R25TW009345, D43TW009101)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
schizophrenia, family caregivers, text messaging, medication adherence, relapse prevention, community mental health services, resource-limited settings, village doctors, award system, pill count, Xiang dialect, Liuyang
MeSH terms
China, Clinical Protocols, Humans, Medically Underserved Area, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Caregivers, Telemedicine, Rural Health Services, Cell Phone, Medication Adherence, Quality Improvement, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review