The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To update previous systematic review of predictive models for 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions. Design: Systematic review. Setting/data source: CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE from 2011 to 2015. Participants: All studies of 28-day and 30-day readmission predictive model. Outcome measures: Characteristics of the included studies, performance of the identified predictive models and key predictive variables included in the models. Results: Of 7310 records, a total of 60 studies with 73 unique predictive models met the inclusion criteria. The utilisation outcome of the models included all-cause readmissions, cardiovascular disease including pneumonia, medical conditions, surgical conditions and mental health condition-related readmissions. Overall, a wide-range C-statistic was reported in 56/60 studies (0.21–0.88). 11 of 13 predictive models for medical condition-related readmissions were found to have consistent moderate discrimination ability (C-statistic ≥0.7). Only two models were designed for the potentially preventable/avoidable readmissions and had C-statistic >0.8. The variables ‘comorbidities’, ‘length of stay’ and ‘previous admissions’ were frequently cited across 73 models. The variables ‘laboratory tests’ and ‘medication’ had more weight in the models for cardiovascular disease and medical condition-related readmissions. Conclusions: The predictive models which focused on general medical condition-related unplanned hospital readmissions reported moderate discriminative ability. Two models for potentially preventable/avoidable readmissions showed high discriminative ability. This updated systematic review, however, found inconsistent performance across the included unique 73 risk predictive models. It is critical to define clearly the utilisation outcomes and the type of accessible data source before the selection of the predictive model. Rigorous validation of the predictive models with moderate-to-high discriminative ability is essential, especially for the two models for the potentially preventable/avoidable readmissions. Given the limited available evidence, the development of a predictive model specifically for paediatric 28-day all-cause, unplanned hospital readmissions is a high priority.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000) · doi:10.1002/0471722146 · Cited by 20,302
Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models: A Framework for Traditional and Novel Measures
Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Cook, N. R., Gerds, T., Gonen, M., Obuchowski, N., Pencina, M. J., & Kattan, M. W. (2010) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181c30fb2 · Cited by 5,170
Rehospitalizations among Patients in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Program
Jencks, S. F., Williams, M. V., & Coleman, E. A. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa0803563 · Cited by 5,164
Risk Prediction Models for Hospital Readmission: A Systematic Review
Kansagara, D., Englander, H., Salanitro, A., Kagen, D., Theobald, C., Freeman, M., & Kripalani, S. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1515 · Cited by 1,707
Evaluation of the Quality of Prognosis Studies in Systematic Reviews
Hayden, J. A., Côté, P., & Bombardier, C. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00010 · Cited by 1,452
van Walraven, C., Dhalla, I. A., Bell, C., Etchells, E., Stiell, I. G., Zarnke, K., Austin, P. C., & Forster, A. J. (2010) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.091117 · Cited by 960
Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: a systematic review
van Walraven, C., Bennett, C., Jennings, A., Austin, P. C., & Forster, A. J. (2011) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.101860 · Cited by 711
Donzé, J., Aujesky, D., Williams, D., & Schnipper, J. L. (2013) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3023 · Cited by 553
Thirty-Day Readmissions — Truth and Consequences
Joynt, K. E., & Jha, A. K. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1201598 · Cited by 481
Hospital readmissions among patients with decompensated cirrhosis
Volk, M. L., Tocco, R. S., Bazick, J., Rakoski, M. O., & Lok, A. S. (2012) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.314 · Cited by 451
Cited by
Golas, S. B., Shibahara, T., Agboola, S., Otaki, H., Sato, J., Nakae, T., Hisamitsu, T., Kojima, G., Felsted, J., Kakarmath, S., et al. (2018) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-018-0620-z · Cited by 287
Readmission prediction using deep learning on electronic health records
Ashfaq, A., Sant’Anna, A., Lingman, M., & Nowaczyk, S. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103256 · Cited by 194
Wang, H. E., Landers, M., Adams, R., Subbaswamy, A., Kharrazi, H., Gaskin, D. J., & Saria, S. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac065 · Cited by 63
Prediction Accuracy With Electronic Medical Records Versus Administrative Claims
Zeltzer, D., Balicer, R. D., Shir, T., Flaks-Manov, N., Einav, L., & Shadmi, E. (2019) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001135 · Cited by 34
Hwang, A. B., Schuepfer, G., Pietrini, M., & Boes, S. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258338 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, H., Della, P. R., Roberts, P., Goh, L., & Dhaliwal, S. S.
- Venue
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2016-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e011060
- ISSN
- 2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2465057711
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 7.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011060
- The paper
- Zhou, H., Della, P. R., Roberts, P., Goh, L., & Dhaliwal, S. S. (2016). Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.