Cited by 29Health Policy Implementation ScienceMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsEvaluation and Performance Assessment

Barriers, facilitators, strategies and outcomes to engaging policymakers, healthcare managers and policy analysts in knowledge synthesis: a scoping review protocol

Open access
Tricco, Andrea C, Zarin, Wasifa, Rios, Patricia, Pham, Ba’, Straus, Sharon E, Langlois, Etienne V·2016·BMJ Open

Abstract

Introduction: Engaging policymakers, healthcare managers and policy analysts in the conduct of knowledge synthesis can help increase its impact. This is particularly important for knowledge synthesis studies commissioned by decision-makers with limited timelines, as well as reviews of health policy and systems research. A scoping review will be conducted to assess barriers, facilitators, strategies and outcomes of engaging these individuals in the knowledge synthesis process. Methods and analysis: We will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews. Literature searches of electronic databases (eg, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ERIC, PsycINFO) will be conducted from inception onwards. The electronic search will be supplemented by searching for sources that index unpublished/difficult to locate studies (eg, GreyNet International database), as well as through scanning of reference lists of reviews on related topics. All study designs using either qualitative or quantitative methodologies will be eligible if there is a description of the strategies, barriers or facilitators, and outcomes of engaging policymakers, healthcare managers and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process. Screening and data abstraction will be conducted by 2 team members independently after a calibration exercise across the team. A third team member will resolve all discrepancies. We will conduct frequency analysis and thematic analysis to chart and characterise the literature, identifying data gaps and opportunities for future research, as well as implications for policy. Ethics and dissemination: This project was commissioned by the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO. The results will be used by Alliance Review Centers of health policy and systems research in low-income and middle-income countries that are conducting knowledge synthesis to inform health policymaking and decision-making. Our results will also be disseminated through conference presentations, train-the-trainer events, peer-reviewed publication and a 1-page policy brief that will be posted on the authors' websites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013929

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]World Health Organization (WHO). Preamble to the constitution of the world health organization as adopted by the international health conference. New York, 19-22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948. http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html
  2. [22]The Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. Chapter 14 Decision-making: Policies and Ethics in Health Care and Public Health, The policy cycle. AFMC Primer on Population Health: A virtual textbook on Public Health concepts for clinicians. 2013. https://afmc.ca/pdf/AFMC-Primer-on-Population-Health-2013-08-14.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tricco, A. C., Zarin, W., Rios, P., Pham, B., Straus, S. E., & Langlois, E. V.
Affiliations
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Corresponding author
Tricco, Andrea C
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-12
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
e013929
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2566322541
Cited by
29
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
  • Department for International Development
  • Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
knowledge synthesis, stakeholder engagement, policy makers, health managers, policy analysts, barriers and facilitators, engagement strategies, health policy and systems research, evidence-informed policy, low- and middle-income countries
MeSH terms
Stakeholder Participation, Scoping Reviews as Topic, Decision Making, Health Policy, Health Services Administration, Humans, Policy Making, Research, Research Design, Review Literature as Topic, Knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review