Cited by 43Medical Malpractice and Liability IssuesPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

Cross-sectional survey on defensive practices and defensive behaviours among Israeli psychiatrists

Open access
Reuveni, I, Pelov, I, Reuveni, H, Bonne, O, Canetti, L·2017·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: Psychiatry is a low-risk specialisation; however, there is a steady increase in malpractice claims against psychiatrists. Defensive psychiatry (DP) refers to any action undertaken by a psychiatrist to avoid malpractice liability that is not for the sole benefit of the patient's mental health and well-being. The objectives of this study were to assess the scope of DP practised by psychiatrists and to understand whether awareness of DP correlated with defensive behaviours. Methods: A questionnaire was administered to 213 Israeli psychiatry residents and certified psychiatrists during May and June 2015 regarding demographic data and experience with malpractice claims, medicolegal literature and litigation. Four clinical scenarios represented defensive behaviours and reactions (feelings and actions) to malpractice claims. Results: Forty-four (20.6%) certified psychiatrists and four (1.9%) residents were directly involved in malpractice claims, while 132 (62.1%) participants admitted to practising DP. Residents acknowledged the practice of DP more than did senior psychiatrists (p=0.038). Awareness of DP correlated with unnecessary hospitalisation of suicidal patients, increased unnecessary follow-up visits and prescribing smaller drug dosages than required for pregnant women and elderly patients. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that DP is well established in the routine clinical daily practice of psychiatrists. Further studies are needed to reveal whether DP effectively protects psychiatrists from malpractice suits or, rather, if it impedes providing quality psychiatric care and represents an economic burden that leads to more harm for the patient.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014153

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surveys in different countries report that the majority of interviewed psychiatrists acknowledged resorting to defensive practices that compromised the quality of care they provided.

    “Although psychiatry is at low risk of malpractice claims in comparison to other specialties 275 , surveys in different countries report that the majority of interviewed psychiatrists acknowledged having resorted to defensive practices, which, in their opinion, compromised the quality of the provided care 274,276,277 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Hurtado Hoyo E, Gutiérrez Zaldívar H, Iraola N Síndrome Clínico Judicial. Rev Asoc Med Argent 2006; 119: 8– 16.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reuveni, I., Pelov, I., Reuveni, H., Bonne, O., & Canetti, L.
Affiliations
  • Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
  • Reuveni, I
  • Reuveni, H
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-03
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
e014153
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2602295980
Cited by
43
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
malpractice liability, defensive behavior, psychiatrists, psychiatric residents, suicidal patients, prescribing in pregnancy, elderly patients, medicolegal issues, quality of psychiatric care
MeSH terms
Defensive Medicine, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Israel, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatry, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review