Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human Early Life Exposome (HELIX) study: a European population-based exposome cohort

Open access
Maitre, Léa, de Bont, Jeroen, Casas, Maribel, Robinson, Oliver, Aasvang, Gunn Marit, Agier, Lydiane, Andrušaitytė, Sandra, Ballester, Ferran, Basagaña, Xavier, Borràs, Eva, Brochot, Céline, Bustamante, Mariona, Carracedo, Angel, de Castro, Montserrat, Dedele, Audrius, Donaire-Gonzalez, David, Estivill, Xavier, Evandt, Jorunn, Fossati, Serena, Giorgis-Allemand, Lise, R Gonzalez, Juan, Granum, Berit, Grazuleviciene, Regina, Bjerve Gützkow, Kristine, Småstuen Haug, Line, Hernandez-Ferrer, Carles, Heude, Barbara, Ibarluzea, Jesus, Julvez, Jordi, Karachaliou, Marianna, Keun, Hector C, Hjertager Krog, Norun, Lau, Chung-Ho E, Leventakou, Vasiliki, Lyon-Caen, Sarah, Manzano, Cyntia, Mason, Dan, McEachan, Rosemary, Meltzer, Helle Margrete, Petraviciene, Inga, Quentin, Joane, Roumeliotaki, Theano, Sabido, Eduard, Saulnier, Pierre-Jean, Siskos, Alexandros P, Siroux, Valérie, Sunyer, Jordi, Tamayo, Ibon, Urquiza, Jose, Vafeiadi, Marina, van Gent, Diana, Vives-Usano, Marta, Waiblinger, Dagmar, Warembourg, Charline, Chatzi, Leda, Coen, Muireann, van den Hazel, Peter, Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J, Slama, Rémy, Thomsen, Cathrine, Wright, John, Vrijheid, Martine·2018·BMJ Open

Abstract

Purpose: Essential to exposome research is the collection of data on many environmental exposures from different domains in the same subjects. The aim of the Human Early Life Exposome (HELIX) study was to measure and describe multiple environmental exposures during early life (pregnancy and childhood) in a prospective cohort and associate these exposures with molecular omics signatures and child health outcomes. Here, we describe recruitment, measurements available and baseline data of the HELIX study populations. Participants: The HELIX study represents a collaborative project across six established and ongoing longitudinal population-based birth cohort studies in six European countries (France, Greece, Lithuania, Norway, Spain and the UK). HELIX used a multilevel study design with the entire study population totalling 31 472 mother-child pairs, recruited during pregnancy, in the six existing cohorts (first level); a subcohort of 1301 mother-child pairs where biomarkers, omics signatures and child health outcomes were measured at age 6–11 years (second level) and repeat-sampling panel studies with around 150 children and 150 pregnant women aimed at collecting personal exposure data (third level). Findings to date: Cohort data include urban environment, hazardous substances and lifestyle-related exposures for women during pregnancy and their offspring from birth until 6–11 years. Common, standardised protocols were used to collect biological samples, measure exposure biomarkers and omics signatures and assess child health across the six cohorts. Baseline data of the cohort show substantial variation in health outcomes and determinants between the six countries, for example, in family affluence levels, tobacco smoking, physical activity, dietary habits and prevalence of childhood obesity, asthma, allergies and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Future plans: HELIX study results will inform on the early life exposome and its association with molecular omics signatures and child health outcomes. Cohort data are accessible for future research involving researchers external to the project.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021311

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Maitre, L., de Bont, J., Casas, M., Robinson, O., Aasvang, G. M., Agier, L., Andrušaitytė, S., Ballester, F., Basagaña, X., Borràs, E., Brochot, C., Bustamante, M., Carracedo, A., de Castro, M., Dedele, A., Donaire-Gonzalez, D., Estivill, X., Evandt, J., Fossati, S., Giorgis-Allemand, L., R Gonzalez, J., Granum, B., Grazuleviciene, R., Bjerve Gützkow, K., Småstuen Haug, L., Hernandez-Ferrer, C., Heude, B., Ibarluzea, J., Julvez, J., Karachaliou, M., Keun, H. C., Hjertager Krog, N., Lau, C.-H. E., Leventakou, V., Lyon-Caen, S., Manzano, C., Mason, D., McEachan, R., Meltzer, H. M., Petraviciene, I., Quentin, J., Roumeliotaki, T., Sabido, E., Saulnier, P.-J., Siskos, A. P., Siroux, V., Sunyer, J., Tamayo, I., Urquiza, J., Vafeiadi, M., van Gent, D., Vives-Usano, M., Waiblinger, D., Warembourg, C., Chatzi, L., Coen, M., van den Hazel, P., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Slama, R., Thomsen, C., Wright, J., & Vrijheid, M.
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-09
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
e021311
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891201019
Cited by
267
References
41
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human Early Life Exposome (HELIX) study: a European population-based exposome cohort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021311
The paper
Maitre, L., de Bont, J., Casas, M., Robinson, O., Aasvang, G. M., Agier, L., Andrušaitytė, S., Ballester, F., Basagaña, X., Borràs, E., Brochot, C., Bustamante, M., Carracedo, A., de Castro, M., Dedele, A., Donaire-Gonzalez, D., Estivill, X., Evandt, J., Fossati, S., . . . Vrijheid, M. (2018). Human Early Life Exposome (HELIX) study: a European population-based exposome cohort. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021311

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.