Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using routinely collected data to understand and predict adverse outcomes in opioid agonist treatment: Protocol for the Opioid Agonist Treatment Safety (OATS) Study.

Larney, Sarah, Hickman, Matthew, Fiellin, David A, Dobbins, Timothy, Nielsen, Suzanne, Jones, Nicola R, Mattick, Richard P, Ali, Robert, Degenhardt, Louisa·2018·BMJ Open

Abstract

Introduction: North America is amid an opioid use epidemic. Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) effectively reduces extramedical opioid use and related harms. As with all pharmacological treatments, there are risks associated with OAT, including fatal overdose. There is a need to better understand risk for adverse outcomes during and after OAT, and for innovative approaches to identifying people at greatest risk of adverse outcomes. The Opioid Agonist Treatment and Safety study aims to address these questions so as to inform the expansion of OAT in the USA. Methods and analysis: This is a retrospective cohort study using linked, routinely collected health data for all people seeking OAT in New South Wales, Australia, between 2001 and 2017. Linked data include hospitalisation, emergency department presentation, mental health diagnoses, incarceration and mortality. We will use standard regression techniques to model the magnitude and risk factors for adverse outcomes (eg, mortality, unplanned hospitalisation and emergency department presentation, and unplanned treatment cessation) during and after OAT, and machine learning approaches to develop a risk-prediction model. Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Population and Health Services Research Ethics Committee (2018HRE0205). Results will be reported in accordance with the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data statement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025204

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.07.018 · DOI
  2. 10.1001/jama.2015.11859 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1002/pds.3989 · DOI
  4. Karanges, 2018, Trends in opioid utilisation in Australia, 2006-2015: Insights from multiple metrics, Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 27, 504, 10.1002/pds.4369 · DOI
  5. Jones, 2018, Rapid change in fentanyl prevalence in a community-based, high-risk sample, JAMA Psychiatry, 75, 298, 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4432 · DOI
  6. 10.1001/jama.2018.2844 · DOI
  7. Conrad, 2015, Community outbreak of hiv infection linked to injection drug use of oxymorphone--Indiana, 2015, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 64, 443
  8. 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302142 · DOI
  9. Stanley, 2012, Hepatitis C virus infections among young adults - rural Wisconsin, 2010, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61, 358
  10. Onofrey, 2011, Hepatitis C virus infection among adolescents and young adults - Massachusetts, 2002-2009, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 60, 538
  11. Peters, 2016, HIV infection linked to injection use of oxymorphone in Indiana, 2014-2015, N Engl J Med, 375, 229, 10.1056/NEJMoa1515195 · DOI
  12. Nielsen S , Larance B , Degenhardt L , et al . Opioid agonist treatment for pharmaceutical opioid dependent people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;2016;172. Art. No. CD011117.doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011117.pub2 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03140.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. Platt, 2018, Needle and syringe programmes and opioid substitution therapy for preventing HCV transmission among people who inject drugs: findings from a Cochrane Review and meta-analysis, Addiction, 113, 545, 10.1111/add.14012 · DOI
  15. 10.1136/bmj.e5945 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kendall CE , Boucher LM , Mark AE , et al . A cohort study examining emergency department visits and hospital admissions among people who use drugs in Ottawa, Canada. Harm Reduction Journal 2017;14(1. · DOI
  17. Robertson, 2018, Associations between pharmacotherapy for opioid dependence and clinical and criminal justice outcomes among adults with co-occurring serious mental illness, J Subst Abuse Treat, 86, 17, 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.12.003 · DOI
  18. Mohlman, 2016, Impact of medication-assisted treatment for opioid addiction on medicaid expenditures and health services utilization rates in Vermont, J Subst Abuse Treat, 67, 9, 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.05.002 · DOI
  19. Krebs, 2014, Dynamics in the costs of criminality among opioid dependent individuals, Drug Alcohol Depend, 144, 193, 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.09.007 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/10550880902772373 · DOI
  21. Russolillo A , Moniruzzaman A , McCandless LC , et al . Associations between methadone maintenance treatment and crime: a 17-year longitudinal cohort study of Canadian provincial offenders. Addiction 2018;113.doi:10.1111/add.14059 · DOI
  22. Kimber, 2015, Mortality risk of opioid substitution therapy with methadone versus buprenorphine: a retrospective cohort study, Lancet Psychiatry, 2, 901, 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00366-1 · DOI
  23. Hickman, 2018, The impact of buprenorphine and methadone on mortality: a primary care cohort study in the United Kingdom, Addiction, 113, 1461, 10.1111/add.14188 · DOI
  24. Bramness, 2012, An increased risk of motor vehicle accidents after prescription of methadone, Addiction, 107, 967, 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03745.x · DOI
  25. Kao, 2015, Arrhythmia associated with buprenorphine and methadone reported to the food and drug administration, Addiction, 110, 1468, 10.1111/add.13013 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00877.x · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.07.019 · DOI
  28. Larance, 2016, Diversion and injection of buprenorphine-naloxone film two years post-introduction in Australia, Drug Alcohol Rev, 35, 83, 10.1111/dar.12344 · DOI
  29. 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000166 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/183335830803700208 · DOI
  31. 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Larney, S., Hickman, M., Fiellin, D. A., Dobbins, T., Nielsen, S., Jones, N. R., Mattick, R. P., Ali, R., & Degenhardt, L.
Affiliations
  • National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
  • Monash Addiction Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-08
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
e025204
ISSN
2044-6055
Cited by
26
References
4
Language
en
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • National Health and Medical Research Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review