Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 100

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing the impact of rising child poverty on the unprecedented rise in infant mortality in England, 2000–2017: time trend analysis

Taylor-Robinson, David, Lai, Eric T C, Wickham, Sophie, Rose, Tanith, Norman, Paul, Bambra, Clare, Whitehead, Margaret, Barr, Ben·2019·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether there were inequalities in the sustained rise in infant mortality in England in recent years and the contribution of rising child poverty to these trends. Design: This is an analysis of trends in infant mortality in local authorities grouped into five categories (quintiles) based on their level of income deprivation. Fixed-effects regression models were used to quantify the association between regional changes in child poverty and regional changes in infant mortality. Setting: 324 English local authorities in 9 English government office regions. Participants: Live-born children under 1 year of age. Main outcome measure: Infant mortality rate, defined as the number of deaths in children under 1 year of age per 100 000 live births in the same year. Results: The sustained and unprecedented rise in infant mortality in England from 2014 to 2017 was not experienced evenly across the population. In the most deprived local authorities, the previously declining trend in infant mortality reversed and mortality rose, leading to an additional 24 infant deaths per 100 000 live births per year (95% CI 6 to 42), relative to the previous trend. There was no significant change from the pre-existing trend in the most affluent local authorities. As a result, inequalities in infant mortality increased, with the gap between the most and the least deprived local authority areas widening by 52 deaths per 100 000 births (95% CI 36 to 68). Overall from 2014 to 2017, there were a total of 572 excess infant deaths (95% CI 200 to 944) compared with what would have been expected based on historical trends. We estimated that each 1% increase in child poverty was significantly associated with an extra 5.8 infant deaths per 100 000 live births (95% CI 2.4 to 9.2). The findings suggest that about a third of the increases in infant mortality between 2014 and 2017 can be attributed to rising child poverty (172 deaths, 95% CI 74 to 266). Conclusion: This study provides evidence that the unprecedented rise in infant mortality disproportionately affected the poorest areas of the country, leaving the more affluent areas unaffected. Our analysis also linked the recent increase in infant mortality in England with rising child poverty, suggesting that about a third of the increase in infant mortality from 2014 to 2017 may be attributed to rising child poverty.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029424

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Hiam, 2018, Government’s misplaced prevention agenda, BMJ, 363, 10.1136/bmj.k5134 · DOI
  2. Taylor-Robinson, 2017, Death rate now rising in UK’s poorest infants, BMJ, 357, 10.1136/bmj.j2258 · DOI
  3. Public Health England . A review of recent trends in mortality in England. London: PHE, 2018.
  4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60296-3 · DOI
  5. Kontopantelis, 2018, Disparities in mortality among 25-44-year-olds in England: a longitudinal, population-based study, Lancet Public Health, 3, e567, 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30177-4 · DOI
  6. Beatty C , Fothergill S . The uneven impact of welfare reform : the financial losses to places and people, 2016. · DOI
  7. Hood A , Waters T . Living standards, poverty and inequality in the UK: 2016-17 to 2021-22. Great Britain Institute for Fiscal Studies; 2017. · DOI
  8. Zylbersztejn, 2018, Child mortality in England compared with Sweden: a birth cohort study, Lancet, 391, 2008, 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30670-6 · DOI
  9. Shim, 2015, Social welfare expenditures and infant mortality, Soc Work Public Health, 30, 567, 10.1080/19371918.2015.1073648 · DOI
  10. Cooper K , Stewart K . Does Money Affect Children’s Outcomes?: A Systematic Review Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2013.
  11. 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306746 · DOI
  12. Barr B , Higgerson J , Whitehead M . Investigating the impact of the English health inequalities strategy: time trend analysis. BMJ 2017;358.doi:10.1136/bmj.j3310 · DOI
  13. Crawley M . An Introduction to Statistics using R. Chichechester: John Wiley and Sons, 2005. · DOI
  14. 10.1136/jech-2015-206209 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60581-X · DOI
  16. Bennett, 2018, Contributions of diseases and injuries to widening life expectancy inequalities in England from 2001 to 2016: a population-based analysis of vital registration data, Lancet Public Health, 3, e586, 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30214-7 · DOI
  17. Steel, 2018, Changes in health in the countries of the UK and 150 English local authority areas 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016, Lancet, 392, 1647, 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32207-4 · DOI
  18. 10.3390/ijerph10062296 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Weightman, 2012, Social inequality and infant health in the UK: systematic review and meta-analyses, BMJ Open, 2, 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000964 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.015 · DOI
  21. Kihal-Talantikite, 2013, Green space, social inequalities and neonatal mortality in France, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 13, 10.1186/1471-2393-13-191 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Komro, 2016, The effect of an increased minimum wage on infant mortality and birth weight, Am J Public Health, 106, 1514, 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303268 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1136/jech-2018-SSMabstracts.17 · DOI
  24. Barr, 2014, The impact of NHS resource allocation policy on health inequalities in England 2001-11: longitudinal ecological study, BMJ, 348, 10.1136/bmj.g3231 · DOI
  25. Krieger, 2008, The fall and rise of US inequities in premature mortality: 1960-2002, PLoS Med, 5, 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050046 · DOI
  26. 2018, Poverty is a political choice, Lancet Public Health, 3, 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30243-3 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Taylor-Robinson, D., Lai, E. T. C., Wickham, S., Rose, T., Norman, P., Bambra, C., Whitehead, M., & Barr, B.
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-10
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
e029424
ISSN
2044-6055
Cited by
100
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MR/P008577/1)
  • Wellcome Trust (108538/Z/15/Z)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.