Cited by 309Clinical practice guidelines implementationMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationHealth Sciences Research and Education

Do physical therapists follow evidence-based guidelines when managing musculoskeletal conditions? Systematic review

Open access
Zadro, Joshua, O’Keeffe, Mary, Maher, Christopher·2019·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: Physicians often refer patients with musculoskeletal conditions to physical therapy. However, it is unclear to what extent physical therapists’ treatment choices align with the evidence. The aim of this systematic review was to determine what percentage of physical therapy treatment choices for musculoskeletal conditions agree with management recommendations in evidence-based guidelines and systematic reviews. Design: Systematic review. Setting: We performed searches in Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Allied and Complementary Medicine, Scopus and Web of Science combining terms synonymous with ‘practice patterns’ and ‘physical therapy’ from the earliest record to April 2018. Participants: Studies that quantified physical therapy treatment choices for musculoskeletal conditions through surveys of physical therapists, audits of clinical notes and other methods (eg, audits of billing codes, clinical observation) were eligible for inclusion. Primary and secondary outcomes: Using medians and IQRs, we summarised the percentage of physical therapists who chose treatments that were recommended, not recommended and had no recommendation, and summarised the percentage of physical therapy treatments provided for various musculoskeletal conditions within the categories of recommended, not recommended and no recommendation. Results were stratified by condition and how treatment choices were assessed (surveys of physical therapists vs audits of clinical notes). Results: We included 94 studies. For musculoskeletal conditions, the median percentage of physical therapists who chose recommended treatments was 54% (n=23 studies; surveys completed by physical therapists) and the median percentage of patients that received recommended physical therapy-delivered treatments was 63% (n=8 studies; audits of clinical notes). For treatments not recommended, these percentages were 43% (n=37; surveys) and 27% (n=20; audits). For treatments with no recommendation, these percentages were 81% (n=37; surveys) and 45% (n=31; audits). Conclusions: Many physical therapists seem not to follow evidence-based guidelines when managing musculoskeletal conditions. There is considerable scope to increase use of recommended treatments and reduce use of treatments that are not recommended. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018094979.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032329

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Barriers to practicing evidence-based therapies include a lack of access to resources that contain such evidence and limited usable formats of the evidence.

    “Barriers to practicing the evidence-based therapies include a lack of access to resources that contain such evidence [92,93] and limited usable formats of the evidence [94].”

    From Development and usability testing of a web-based and therapist-assisted coping skills program for managing psychosocial problems in individuals with hand and upper limb injuries: Mixed methods study (2020) · cites this paper as [92]

    The Discussion’s 'Unanswered questions and future research' section suggests limited evidence-based-practice training and lack of awareness of guidelines as possible explanations for treatment choices. Neither that section nor the passages returned for searches on access to evidence resources and usable formats addresses the two barriers claimed here. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [7]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guidelines Low back pain and sciatica in over 16S: assessment and management, 2016 Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59 [Accessed 18th Mar 2019]. 27929617
  2. [12]Ayanniyi O, Lasisi OT, Adegoke BOA, et al Management of low back pain: attitude and treatment preferences of physiotherapist in Nigeria. Afr J Biomed Res 2007; 10: 41– 9.
  3. [50]Reid D, Larmer P, Robb G, et al Use of a vignette to investigate the physiotherapy treatment of an acute episode of low back pain: report of a survey of New Zealand physiotherapists. New Zealand J Physiother 2002; 30: 26– 32.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zadro, J., O’Keeffe, M., & Maher, C.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Zadro, Joshua
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-10
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
e032329
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980198210
Cited by
309
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
physiotherapy, evidence-based practice, clinical practice patterns, musculoskeletal disorders, guideline adherence, physiotherapists, treatment guidelines
MeSH terms
Humans, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence, Physical Therapy Modalities, Evidence-Based Practice, Physical Therapists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review