Cited by 43Health disparities and outcomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Midlife socioeconomic position and old-age dementia mortality: A large prospective register-based study from Finland

Open access
Korhonen, Kaarina, Einiö, Elina, Leinonen, Taina, Tarkiainen, Lasse, Martikainen, Pekka·2020·BMJ Open

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between multiple indicators of socioeconomic position and dementia-related death, and to estimate the contribution of dementia to socioeconomic differences in overall mortality at older ages. DESIGN: Prospective population-based register study. SETTING: Finland. PARTICIPANTS: 11% random sample of the population aged 70-87 years resident in Finland at the end of year 2000 (n=54 964). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence rates, Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities and Cox regression HRs of dementia mortality in 2001-2016 by midlife education, occupational social class and household income measured at ages 53-57 years. RESULTS: During the 528 387 person-years at risk, 11 395 individuals died from dementia (215.7 per 10 000 person-years). Lower midlife education, occupational social class and household income were associated with higher dementia mortality, and the differences persisted to the oldest old ages. Compared with mortality from all other causes, however, the socioeconomic differences emerged later. Dementia accounted for 28% of the difference between low and high education groups in overall mortality at age 70+ years, and for 21% of the difference between lowest and highest household income quintiles. All indicators of socioeconomic position were independently associated with dementia mortality, low household income being the strongest independent predictor (HR=1.24, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.32), followed by basic education (HR=1.14, 1.06 to 1.23). Manual occupational social class was related to a 6% higher hazard (HR=1.06, 1.01 to 1.11) compared with non-manual social class. Adjustment for midlife economic activity, baseline marital status and chronic health conditions attenuated the excess hazard of low midlife household income, although significant effects remained. CONCLUSION: Several indicators of socioeconomic position predict dementia mortality independently and socioeconomic inequalities persist into the oldest old ages. The results demonstrate that dementia is among the most important contributors to socioeconomic inequalities in overall mortality at older ages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033234

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korhonen, K., Einiö, E., Leinonen, T., Tarkiainen, L., & Martikainen, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI)
Corresponding author
Korhonen, Kaarina
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
e033234
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998876495
Cited by
43
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission (667661)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
dementia mortality, socioeconomic position, household income, occupational class, blue-collar workers, socioeconomic inequalities in mortality, oldest old, chronic disease, marital status
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Finland, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Registries, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Survival Rate, Age Distribution, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review