Cited by 152Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Socioeconomic status as a risk factor for dementia death: individual participant meta-analysis of 86 508 men and women from the UK

Open access
Russ, Tom C., Stamatakis, Emmanuel, Hamer, Mark, Starr, John M., Kivimäki, Mika, Batty, G. David·2013·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Life-course socioeconomic factors may have a role in dementia aetiology but there is a current paucity of studies. Meta-analyses of individual participant data would considerably strengthen this evidence base. Aims: To examine the association between socioeconomic status in early life and adulthood with later dementia death. Method: Individual participant meta-analysis of 11 prospective cohort studies (1994–2004,n= 86508). Results: Leaving full-time education at an earlier age was associated with an increased risk of dementia death in women (fully adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for age ⩽14 v.age ⩾16: HR = 1.76, 95% Cl 1.23–2.53) but not men. Occupational social class was not statistically significantly associated with dementia death in men or women. Conclusions: Lower educational attainment in women was associated with an increased risk of dementia-related death independently of common risk behaviours and comorbidities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.119479

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • European studies have found that the relationship of lower educational attainment with dementia outcomes may be stronger in women than in men.

    “European studies have found that the relationship of lower educational attainment with dementia outcomes may be stronger in women than men. 277,278”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [278]

  • The association of lower educational attainment with dementia outcomes may be stronger in women than men.

    “European studies have found that the association of lower educational attainment with dementia outcomes may be stronger in women than men.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [304]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [8]8. Persson G, Skoog I. A prospective population study of psychosocial risk factors for late onset dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1996; 11: 15-22.
  2. [19]19. Launer L, Andersen K, Dewey ME, Letenneur L, Ott A, Amaducci L, et al. Rates and risk factors for dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1999; 52: 78-84.
  3. [35]35. Stern Y, Alexander G, Prohovnik I, Stricks L, Link B, Lennon M, et al. Relationship between lifetime occupation and parietal flow. Neurology 1995; 45: 55-60.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russ, T. C., Stamatakis, E., Hamer, M., Starr, J. M., Kivimäki, M., & Batty, G. D.
Affiliations
  • National Health Service Scotland (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Russ, Tom C.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2013-07
Volume
203
Issue
1
Pages
10-17
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2054804413
Cited by
152
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (R01HL036310, 84698, G0700704/84698)
  • NHS Health Scotland
  • Scottish Government
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (R01AG034454)
  • British Heart Foundation (RG/13/2/30098)
  • University College London
  • University of Edinburgh (G0700704/84698)
  • Academy of Finland (R01 AG034454)
  • Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (G0700704/84698)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K013351/1, G0700704, MR/K026992/1, R01AG034454)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council (R01AG034454, ES/J023299/1, R01HL036310)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG034454)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL036310)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
socioeconomic status, dementia mortality, educational attainment, occupational class, sex differences, life course factors, dementia risk factors
MeSH terms
Dementia, Educational Status, Female, United Kingdom, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Risk-Taking, Smoking, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review