Cited by 27Nutrition and Health in AgingFrailty in Older AdultsBody Composition Measurement Techniques

Sarcopenia, physical frailty, undernutrition and obesity cooccurrence among Portuguese community-dwelling older adults: results from Nutrition UP 65 cross-sectional study

Open access
Sousa-Santos, Ana Rita, Afonso, Cláudia, Borges, Nuno, Santos, Alejandro, Padrão, Patrícia, Moreira, Pedro, F Amaral, Teresa·2020·BMJ Open

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the coexistence of sarcopenia, frailty, undernutrition and obesity and to identify the factors associated with the cooccurrence of these conditions in an older population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Portugal. PARTICIPANTS: 1454 older adults with 65 years or older, from Nutrition UP 65 study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Sarcopenia was identified using the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 guidelines and physical frailty using Fried phenotype. Mini-Nutritional Assessment-Short Form was used to ascertain undernutrition, and obesity was evaluated by body mass index. RESULTS: 57.3% presented at least one condition, 38.0% were identified with one and 19.3% were identified with two or more conditions. When all preconditions were considered, 95.7% of the older adults presented at least one of these preconditions or conditions. Multinomial logistic regression multivariate analysis revealed that being male (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.88), being married or in a common-law marriage (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.84) and having a higher educational level (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.73) were inversely associated with having two or more conditions, while age >75 years (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.14 to 2.24), a poor self-perception of health status (OR 5.61; 95% CI 3.50 to 9.01), ≥5 medications (OR 3.11; 95% CI 1.77 to 5.46) and cognitive impairment (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.37 to 2.48) were directly associated. CONCLUSIONS: Almost three out of five older adults presented at least one of the conditions related to nutritional status, and about one in five had two or more of these occurrences. However, the low coexistence observed between all of these reinforces the need to assess them all individually during the geriatric assessment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033661

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Discrepancies were also found for the association of sex, social status and quality of life with SO development, with some articles detecting higher risk in males or females and in the presence of poor social status, urban area, married individuals, or white collar subgroup.

    “Discrepancies were also found for the association of sex, social status and quality of life with SO development as some articles detected a higher risk in males [23,24] or females [25,26] and in the presence of poor social status [18e20,26e29], in people living in urban area [30], married individuals [20] or in white collar subgroup [31].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sousa-Santos, A. R., Afonso, C., Borges, N., Santos, A., Padrão, P., Moreira, P., & F Amaral, T.
Affiliations
  • FCNAUP - Faculdade de Ciências da Nutrição e Alimentação, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Santos, Alejandro
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-06
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
e033661
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034610675
Cited by
27
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universidade do Porto
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/138362/2018)
  • EEA Grants
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
sarcopenia, physical frailty, malnutrition, obesity, multimorbidity, older adults, nutritional status, geriatric assessment, cognitive impairment, polypharmacy, self-rated health, educational attainment, marital status, sex differences
MeSH terms
Frailty, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Phenotype, Portugal, Geriatric Assessment, Nutrition Assessment, Comorbidity, Sarcopenia, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review