Cited by 29Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

Community treatment orders and associations with readmission rates and duration of psychiatric hospital admission: a controlled electronic case register study

Open access
Barkhuizen, Wikus, Cullen, Alexis E, Shetty, Hitesh, Pritchard, Megan, Stewart, Robert, McGuire, Philip, Patel, Rashmi·2020·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: Limited evidence is available regarding the effect of community treatment orders (CTOs) on mortality and readmission to psychiatric hospital. We compared clinical outcomes between patients placed on CTOs to a control group of patients discharged to voluntary community mental healthcare. Design and setting: An observational study using deidentified electronic health record data from inpatients receiving mental healthcare in South London using the Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) system. Data from patients discharged between November 2008 and May 2014 from compulsory inpatient treatment under the Mental Health Act were analysed. Participants: 830 participants discharged on a CTO (mean age 40 years; 63% male) and 3659 control participants discharged without a CTO (mean age 42 years; 53% male). Outcome measures: The number of days spent in the community until readmission, the number of days spent in inpatient care in the 2 years prior to and the 2 years following the index admission and mortality. Results: The mean duration of a CTO was 3.2 years. Patients receiving care from forensic psychiatry services were five times more likely and patients receiving a long-acting injectable antipsychotic were twice as likely to be placed on a CTO. There was a significant association between CTO receipt and readmission in adjusted models (HR: 1.60, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.80, p<0.001). Compared with controls, patients on a CTO spent 17.3 additional days (95% CI 4.0 to 30.6, p=0.011) in a psychiatric hospital in the 2 years following index admission and had a lower mortality rate (HR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.88, p=0.004). Conclusions: Many patients spent longer on CTOs than initially anticipated by policymakers. Those on CTOs are readmitted sooner, spend more time in hospital and have a lower mortality rate. These findings merit consideration in future amendments to the UK Mental Health Act.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035121

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [2]Trevithick L, Carlile J, Nodiyal S, et al Community treatment orders: an analysis of the first five years of use in England. Br J Psychiatry 2018; 212: 175– 9. 10.1192/bjp.2017.51 29439748 · DOI
  2. [4]Burns T, Rugkåsa J, Molodynski A, et al Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2013; 381: 1627– 33. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60107-5 23537605 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [5]Burns T, Yeeles K, Koshiaris C, et al Effect of increased compulsion on readmission to hospital or disengagement from community services for patients with psychosis: follow-up of a cohort from the OCTET trial. The Lancet Psychiatry 2015; 2: 881– 90. 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00231-X 26362496 · DOI
  4. [6]Swartz MS, Swanson JW, Wagner HR, et al Can involuntary outpatient commitment reduce hospital recidivism?: findings from a randomized trial with severely mentally ill individuals. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 1968– 75. 10.1176/ajp.156.12.1968 10588412 · DOI
  5. [9]Rawala M, Gupta S Use of community treatment orders in an inner-London assertive outreach service. Psychiatr Bull 2014; 38: 13– 18. 10.1192/pb.bp.112.042184 PMC4067843 25237484 · DOI
  6. [10]Awara MA, Jaffar K, Roberts P Effectiveness of the community treatment order in streamlining psychiatric services. J Ment Health 2013; 22: 191– 7. 10.3109/09638237.2013.775408 23574505 · DOI
  7. [11]Dye S, Dannaram S, Loynes B, et al Supervised community treatment: 2-year follow-up study in Suffolk. Psychiatrist 2012; 36: 298– 302. 10.1192/pb.bp.111.036657 · DOI
  8. [12]Rugkåsa J Effectiveness of community treatment orders: the International evidence. Can J Psychiatry 2016; 61: 15– 24. 10.1177/0706743715620415 27582449 PMC4756604 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [14]Kisely S, Campbell LA, Scott A, et al Randomized and non-randomized evidence for the effect of compulsory community and involuntary out-patient treatment on health service use: systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2007; 37: 3– 14. 10.1017/S0033291706008592 16923325 · DOI
  10. [17]Perera G, Broadbent M, Callard F, et al Cohort profile of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation trust biomedical research centre (SLAM BRC) case register: current status and recent enhancement of an electronic mental health Record-derived data resource. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e008721 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008721 PMC4785292 26932138 · DOI
  11. [18]Stewart R, Soremekun M, Perera G, et al The South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation trust biomedical research centre (SLAM BRC) case register: development and descriptive data. BMC Psychiatry 2009; 9: 51 10.1186/1471-244X-9-51 19674459 PMC2736946 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [19]Fernandes AC, Cloete D, Broadbent MTM, et al Development and evaluation of a de-identification procedure for a case register sourced from mental health electronic records. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13: 71 10.1186/1472-6947-13-71 23842533 PMC3751474 · DOI
  13. [23]Patel MX, Matonhodze J, Baig MK, et al Naturalistic outcomes of community treatment orders: antipsychotic long-acting injections versus oral medication. J Psychopharmacol 2013; 27: 629– 37. 10.1177/0269881113486717 23676196 · DOI
  14. [24]DeRidder R, Molodynski A, Manning C, et al Community treatment orders in the UK 5 years on: a repeat national survey of psychiatrists. BJPsych Bull 2016; 40: 119– 23. 10.1192/pb.bp.115.050773 27280030 PMC4887727 · DOI
  15. [25]Rugkåsa J, Molodynski A, Yeeles K, et al Community treatment orders: clinical and social outcomes, and a subgroup analysis from the OCTET RCT. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2015; 131: 321– 9. 10.1111/acps.12373 25495209 · DOI
  16. [26]Kisely S, Preston N, Xiao J, et al Reducing all-cause mortality among patients with psychiatric disorders: a population-based study. Can Med Assoc J 2013; 185: E50– 6. 10.1503/cmaj.121077 23148054 PMC3537812 · DOI
  17. [27]Segal SP, Burgess PM Effect of conditional release from hospitalization on mortality risk. PS 2006; 57: 1607– 13. 10.1176/ps.2006.57.11.1607 PMC7075631 17085609 · DOI
  18. [28]Kisely S, Campbell LA, Preston NJ, et al Can epidemiological studies assist in the evaluation of community treatment orders? — the experience of Western Australia and nova Scotia. Int J Law Psychiatry 2006; 29: 507– 15. 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.01.006 17067675 · DOI
  19. [29]Swanson JW, Swartz MS Why the evidence for outpatient commitment is good enough. Psychiatr Serv 2014; 65: 808– 11. 10.1176/appi.ps.201300424 24881685 · DOI
  20. [30]Kisely S, Preston N, Xiao J, et al An eleven-year evaluation of the effect of community treatment orders on changes in mental health service use. J Psychiatr Res 2013; 47: 650– 6. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.01.010 23415453 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barkhuizen, W., Cullen, A. E., Shetty, H., Pritchard, M., Stewart, R., McGuire, P., & Patel, R.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Patel, Rashmi
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-03
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
e035121
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999876229
Cited by
29
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Academy of Medical Sciences (SGL015/1020)
  • Wellcome Trust (107395/Z/15/Z)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/S003118/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
community treatment orders, Mental Health Act, psychiatric readmission, mortality, forensic psychiatry, long-acting injectable antipsychotics, Mental Health Act reform
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Readmission, Young Adult, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review