Community treatment orders and associations with readmission rates and duration of psychiatric hospital admission: a controlled electronic case register study
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: Limited evidence is available regarding the effect of community treatment orders (CTOs) on mortality and readmission to psychiatric hospital. We compared clinical outcomes between patients placed on CTOs to a control group of patients discharged to voluntary community mental healthcare. Design and setting: An observational study using deidentified electronic health record data from inpatients receiving mental healthcare in South London using the Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) system. Data from patients discharged between November 2008 and May 2014 from compulsory inpatient treatment under the Mental Health Act were analysed. Participants: 830 participants discharged on a CTO (mean age 40 years; 63% male) and 3659 control participants discharged without a CTO (mean age 42 years; 53% male). Outcome measures: The number of days spent in the community until readmission, the number of days spent in inpatient care in the 2 years prior to and the 2 years following the index admission and mortality. Results: The mean duration of a CTO was 3.2 years. Patients receiving care from forensic psychiatry services were five times more likely and patients receiving a long-acting injectable antipsychotic were twice as likely to be placed on a CTO. There was a significant association between CTO receipt and readmission in adjusted models (HR: 1.60, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.80, p<0.001). Compared with controls, patients on a CTO spent 17.3 additional days (95% CI 4.0 to 30.6, p=0.011) in a psychiatric hospital in the 2 years following index admission and had a lower mortality rate (HR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.88, p=0.004). Conclusions: Many patients spent longer on CTOs than initially anticipated by policymakers. Those on CTOs are readmitted sooner, spend more time in hospital and have a lower mortality rate. These findings merit consideration in future amendments to the UK Mental Health Act.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The mortality reduction finding is in line with findings from an epidemiological study from Great Britain.
“This is in line with findings from an epidemiological study from Great Britain”
From The benefits and harms of community treatment orders for people diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses: A rapid umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2024) · cites this paper as Barkhuizen et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Assessing the New York City involuntary outpatient commitment pilot program
Steadman, H. J., Gounis, K., Dennis, D., Hopper, K., Roche, B., Swartz, M., & Robbins, P. C. (2001) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.330 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders.
Kisely, S. R., Campbell, L. A., & O'Reilly, R. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004408.pub5 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
A systematic review of the effect of community treatment orders on service use
Maughan, D., Molodynski, A., Rugkåsa, J., & Burns, T. (2014) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-013-0781-0 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Barnett, P., Matthews, H., Lloyd-Evans, B., Mackay, E., Pilling, S., & Johnson, S. (2018) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30382-1 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Kisely, S., & Hall, K. (2014) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371405901010 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- [2]Trevithick L, Carlile J, Nodiyal S, et al Community treatment orders: an analysis of the first five years of use in England. Br J Psychiatry 2018; 212: 175– 9. 10.1192/bjp.2017.51 29439748 · DOI
- [4]Burns T, Rugkåsa J, Molodynski A, et al Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2013; 381: 1627– 33. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60107-5 23537605 · DOI · Paper page
- [5]Burns T, Yeeles K, Koshiaris C, et al Effect of increased compulsion on readmission to hospital or disengagement from community services for patients with psychosis: follow-up of a cohort from the OCTET trial. The Lancet Psychiatry 2015; 2: 881– 90. 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00231-X 26362496 · DOI
- [6]Swartz MS, Swanson JW, Wagner HR, et al Can involuntary outpatient commitment reduce hospital recidivism?: findings from a randomized trial with severely mentally ill individuals. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 1968– 75. 10.1176/ajp.156.12.1968 10588412 · DOI
- [9]Rawala M, Gupta S Use of community treatment orders in an inner-London assertive outreach service. Psychiatr Bull 2014; 38: 13– 18. 10.1192/pb.bp.112.042184 PMC4067843 25237484 · DOI
- [10]Awara MA, Jaffar K, Roberts P Effectiveness of the community treatment order in streamlining psychiatric services. J Ment Health 2013; 22: 191– 7. 10.3109/09638237.2013.775408 23574505 · DOI
- [11]Dye S, Dannaram S, Loynes B, et al Supervised community treatment: 2-year follow-up study in Suffolk. Psychiatrist 2012; 36: 298– 302. 10.1192/pb.bp.111.036657 · DOI
- [12]Rugkåsa J Effectiveness of community treatment orders: the International evidence. Can J Psychiatry 2016; 61: 15– 24. 10.1177/0706743715620415 27582449 PMC4756604 · DOI · Paper page
- [14]Kisely S, Campbell LA, Scott A, et al Randomized and non-randomized evidence for the effect of compulsory community and involuntary out-patient treatment on health service use: systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2007; 37: 3– 14. 10.1017/S0033291706008592 16923325 · DOI
- [17]Perera G, Broadbent M, Callard F, et al Cohort profile of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation trust biomedical research centre (SLAM BRC) case register: current status and recent enhancement of an electronic mental health Record-derived data resource. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e008721 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008721 PMC4785292 26932138 · DOI
- [18]Stewart R, Soremekun M, Perera G, et al The South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation trust biomedical research centre (SLAM BRC) case register: development and descriptive data. BMC Psychiatry 2009; 9: 51 10.1186/1471-244X-9-51 19674459 PMC2736946 · DOI · Paper page
- [19]Fernandes AC, Cloete D, Broadbent MTM, et al Development and evaluation of a de-identification procedure for a case register sourced from mental health electronic records. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13: 71 10.1186/1472-6947-13-71 23842533 PMC3751474 · DOI
- [23]Patel MX, Matonhodze J, Baig MK, et al Naturalistic outcomes of community treatment orders: antipsychotic long-acting injections versus oral medication. J Psychopharmacol 2013; 27: 629– 37. 10.1177/0269881113486717 23676196 · DOI
- [24]DeRidder R, Molodynski A, Manning C, et al Community treatment orders in the UK 5 years on: a repeat national survey of psychiatrists. BJPsych Bull 2016; 40: 119– 23. 10.1192/pb.bp.115.050773 27280030 PMC4887727 · DOI
- [25]Rugkåsa J, Molodynski A, Yeeles K, et al Community treatment orders: clinical and social outcomes, and a subgroup analysis from the OCTET RCT. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2015; 131: 321– 9. 10.1111/acps.12373 25495209 · DOI
- [26]Kisely S, Preston N, Xiao J, et al Reducing all-cause mortality among patients with psychiatric disorders: a population-based study. Can Med Assoc J 2013; 185: E50– 6. 10.1503/cmaj.121077 23148054 PMC3537812 · DOI
- [27]Segal SP, Burgess PM Effect of conditional release from hospitalization on mortality risk. PS 2006; 57: 1607– 13. 10.1176/ps.2006.57.11.1607 PMC7075631 17085609 · DOI
- [28]Kisely S, Campbell LA, Preston NJ, et al Can epidemiological studies assist in the evaluation of community treatment orders? — the experience of Western Australia and nova Scotia. Int J Law Psychiatry 2006; 29: 507– 15. 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.01.006 17067675 · DOI
- [29]Swanson JW, Swartz MS Why the evidence for outpatient commitment is good enough. Psychiatr Serv 2014; 65: 808– 11. 10.1176/appi.ps.201300424 24881685 · DOI
- [30]Kisely S, Preston N, Xiao J, et al An eleven-year evaluation of the effect of community treatment orders on changes in mental health service use. J Psychiatr Res 2013; 47: 650– 6. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.01.010 23415453 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kisely, S., Zirnsak, T., Corderoy, A., Ryan, C. J., & Brophy, L. (2024) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/00048674241246436 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“To our knowledge, this is the first umbrella review of both quantitative and qualitative data that specifically examined the benefits and harms of compulsory community treatment in a wide range of countries including the United States, Canada, Taiwan, Great Britain, Norway, Spain, Netherlands, Ireland, Australia and N…”
Result
- Authors
- Barkhuizen, W., Cullen, A. E., Shetty, H., Pritchard, M., Stewart, R., McGuire, P., & Patel, R.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Patel, Rashmi
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e035121
- ISSN
- 2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7059496
- OpenAlex
- W2999876229
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health Research
- Academy of Medical Sciences (SGL015/1020)
- Wellcome Trust (107395/Z/15/Z)
- Medical Research Council (MR/S003118/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
- Keywords
- community treatment orders, Mental Health Act, psychiatric readmission, mortality, forensic psychiatry, long-acting injectable antipsychotics, Mental Health Act reform
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Readmission, Young Adult, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review