CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 332Primary Care and Health OutcomesHealthcare Systems and ChallengesCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the core functions of primary care: will the cure be worse than the disease? A qualitative interview study in Flemish GPs

Open access
Verhoeven, Veronique, Tsakitzidis, Giannoula, Philips, Hilde, Van Royen, Paul·2020·BMJ Open
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039674PMC PMC7306272
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Objectives: The current COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the measures taken to control it, have a profound impact on healthcare. This study was set up to gain insights into the consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak on the core competencies of general practice, as they are experienced by general practitioners (GPs) on the frontline. Design, setting, participants: We performed a descriptive study using semistructured interviews with 132 GPs in Flanders, using a topic list based on the WONCA definition of core competencies in general practice. Data were analysed qualitatively using framework analysis. Results: Changes in practice management and in consultation strategies were quickly adopted. There was a major switch towards telephone triage and consults, for covid-related as well as for non-covid related problems. Patient-centred care is still a major objective. Clinical decision-making is largely focused on respiratory assessment and triage, and GPs feel that acute care is compromised, both by their own changed focus and by the fact that patients consult less frequently for non-covid problems. Chronic care is mostly postponed, and this will have consequences that will extend and become visible after the corona crisis. Through the holistic eyes of primary care, the current outbreak—as well as the measures taken to control it—will have a profound impact on psychological and socioeconomic well-being. This impact is already visible in vulnerable people and will continue to become clear in the medium and long terms. GPs think that they are at high risk of getting infected. Dropping out and being unable to contribute their part or becoming virus transmitters are reported to be greater concerns than getting ill themselves. Conclusions: The current times have a profound impact on the core competences of primary care. Although the vast increase in patients soliciting medical help and the necessary separate covid and non-covid flows have been dealt with, GPs are worried about the continuity of regular care and the consequences of the anticovid measures. These may become a threat for the general health of the population and for the provision of primary healthcare in the near and distant future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039674

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Morreel S , Philips H , Verhoeven V . Organisation and characteristics of out-of-hours primary care during a COVID-19 outbreak. In Press.
  2. Nietzsche F . Twilight of the Idols: or how to philosophise with a hammer (Oxford world's classics). 10. Oxford University Press, 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 330

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Verhoeven, V., Tsakitzidis, G., Philips, H., & Van Royen, P.
Affiliations
  • Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
ORCID
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-06
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
e039674
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039674
PMC
PMC7306272
OpenAlex
W3035788433
Cited by
332
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 21
FWCI
69.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, primary care, general practitioners, telephone triage, practice management, continuity of care, acute care, patient-centered care, clinician well-being, occupational infection risk, Flanders
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, COVID-19, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Belgium, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Pneumonia, Viral, Primary Health Care, Coronavirus Infections, Disease Management, Qualitative Research, General Practitioners, General Practice, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review