The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cohort study evaluating the burden of wounds to the UK’s National Health Service in 2017/2018: update from 2012/2013
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of wounds managed by the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) in 2017/2018 and associated health outcomes, resource use and costs. Design: Retrospective cohort analysis of the electronic records of patients from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. Setting: Primary and secondary care sectors in the UK. Participants: Randomly selected cohort of 3000 patients from the THIN database who had a wound in 2017/2018. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Patients’ characteristics, wound-related health outcomes, healthcare resource use and total NHS cost of patient management. Results: There were an estimated 3.8 million patients with a wound managed by the NHS in 2017/2018, of which 70% healed in the study year; 89% and 49% of acute and chronic wounds healed, respectively. An estimated 59% of chronic wounds healed if there was no evidence of infection compared with 45% if there was a definite or suspected infection. Healing rate of acute wounds was unaffected by the presence of infection. Smoking status appeared to only affect the healing rate of chronic wounds. Annual levels of resource use attributable to wound management included 54.4 million district/community nurse visits, 53.6 million healthcare assistant visits and 28.1 million practice nurse visits. The annual NHS cost of wound management was £8.3 billion, of which £2.7 billion and £5.6 billion were associated with managing healed and unhealed wounds, respectively. Eighty-one per cent of the total annual NHS cost was incurred in the community. Conclusion: The annual prevalence of wounds increased by 71% between 2012/2013 and 2017/2018. There was a substantial increase in resource use over this period and patient management cost increased by 48% in real terms. There needs to be a structural change within the NHS in order to manage the increasing demand for wound care and improve patient outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network
Twaddle, S., & Qureshi, S. (2005) · Evidence-based Healthcare and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.ehbc.2005.09.008 · Cited by 4,084
Alderwick, H., & Dixon, J. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l84 · Cited by 744
Blak, B., Thompson, M., Dattani, H., & Bourke, A. (2011) · Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics · doi:10.14236/jhi.v19i4.820 · Cited by 630
Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK
Guest, J. F., Ayoub, N., McIlwraith, T., Uchegbu, I., Gerrish, A., Weidlich, D., Vowden, K., & Vowden, P. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009283 · Cited by 610
Self-citationHealth economic burden that different wound types impose on the UK's National Health Service
Guest, J. F., Ayoub, N., McIlwraith, T., Uchegbu, I., Gerrish, A., Weidlich, D., Vowden, K., & Vowden, P. (2017) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/iwj.12603 · Cited by 406
Self-citationVenous leg ulcer management in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes
Guest, J. F., Fuller, G. W., & Vowden, P. (2018) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/iwj.12814 · Cited by 233
Self-citationDiabetic Foot Problems: Prevention and Management
Internal Clinical Guidelines Team (2015) · Cited by 218
Guest, J. F., Vowden, K., & Vowden, P. (2017) · Journal of Wound Care · doi:10.12968/jowc.2017.26.6.292 · Cited by 198
Self-citationDiabetic foot ulcer management in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes
Guest, J. F., Fuller, G. W., & Vowden, P. (2017) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/iwj.12816 · Cited by 150
Self-citationLo, Z. J., Lim, X., Eng, D., Car, J., Hong, Q., Yong, E., Zhang, L., Chandrasekar, S., Tan, G. W. L., Chan, Y. M., et al. (2020) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/iwj.13333 · Cited by 107
Cited by
Falanga, V., Isseroff, R. R., Soulika, A. M., Romanelli, M., Margolis, D., Kapp, S., Granick, M., & Harding, K. (2022) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-022-00377-3 · Cited by 1,020
Content validation and usability of a chatbot of guidelines for wound dressing
da Silva Lima Roque, G., Roque de Souza, R., Araújo do Nascimento, J. W., de Campos Filho, A. S., de Melo Queiroz, S. R., & Ramos Vieira Santos, I. C. (2021) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104473 · Cited by 31
Aftab, N., Varghese, P., Khalid, A., Umar, A. K., Wallis, C. J., Bates, M., & Hooper, S. E. (2025) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-025-13650-8 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Guest, J. F., Fuller, G. W., & Vowden, P.
- Venue
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e045253
- ISSN
- 2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3115493586
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 25.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cohort study evaluating the burden of wounds to the UK’s National Health Service in 2017/2018: update from 2012/2013. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045253
- The paper
- Guest, J. F., Fuller, G. W., & Vowden, P. (2020). Cohort study evaluating the burden of wounds to the UK’s National Health Service in 2017/2018: update from 2012/2013. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.