Characterising ICU-ward handoffs at three academic medical centres: process and perceptions
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is limited literature about physician handoffs between the intensive care unit (ICU) and the ward, and best practices have not been described. These patients are uniquely vulnerable given their medical complexity, diagnostic uncertainty and reduced monitoring intensity. We aimed to characterise the structure, perceptions and processes of ICU-ward handoffs across three teaching hospitals using multimodal methods: by identifying the handoff components involved in communication failures and describing common processes of patient transfer. METHODS: We conducted a study at three academic medical centres using two methods to characterise the structure, perceptions and processes of ICU-ward transfers: (1) an anonymous resident survey characterising handoff communication during ICU-ward transfer, and (2) comparison of process maps to identify similarities and differences between ICU-ward transfer processes across the three hospitals. RESULTS: Of the 295 internal medicine residents approached, 175 (59%) completed the survey. 87% of the respondents recalled at least one adverse event related to communication failure during ICU-ward transfer. 95% agreed that a well-structured handoff template would improve ICU-ward transfer. Rehabilitation needs, intravenous access/hardware and risk assessments for readmission to the ICU were the most frequently omitted or incorrectly communicated components of handoff notes. More than 60% of the respondents reported that notes omitted or miscommunicated pending results, active subspecialty consultants, nutrition and intravenous fluids, antibiotics, and healthcare decision-maker information at least twice per month. Despite variable process across the three sites, all process maps demonstrated flaws and potential for harm in critical steps of the ICU-ward transition. CONCLUSION: In this multisite study, despite significant process variation across sites, almost all resident physicians recalled an adverse event related to the ICU-ward handoff. Future work is needed to determine best practices for ICU-ward handoffs at academic medical centres.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The postimplementation survey cohort of internal medicine trainees and attendings will not be identical to the preimplementation cohort from the prior study.
“A notable limitation is the inconsistency of our postimplementation survey cohort of internal medicine trainees and attendings, which will not be identical to the preimplementation cohort from our prior study [9].”
From Improving Communication in Intensive Care Unit to Ward Transitions: Protocol for Multisite National Implementation of the ICU-PAUSE Handoff Tool (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
ICU-ward transitions are managed heterogeneously across health systems.
“ICU–ward transitions are managed heterogeneously across health systems (1), which may affect hospital quality and safety (3).”
From Cocreating the ICU-PAUSE Tool for Intensive Care Unit–Ward Transitions (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
ICU-ward patient transfers are vulnerable because of patient complexity, clinical uncertainty, and nonintersecting communication between physicians and nurses.
“Patients transferring from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the hospital wards are vulnerable because of patient complexity, clinical uncertainty, and nonintersecting communication between physicians and nurses (1).”
From Cocreating the ICU-PAUSE Tool for Intensive Care Unit–Ward Transitions (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
Despite marked differences in handoff processes across institutions, there was convergence of opinion by residents in focus groups across institutions.
“Despite the marked differences in handoff processes across our institutions (1), there was convergence of opinion by residents in focus groups across institutions, suggesting that this intervention may be generalizable to other academic medical centers.”
From Cocreating the ICU-PAUSE Tool for Intensive Care Unit–Ward Transitions (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
PGY-1 residents infrequently hold primary responsibility for ICU-ward transfer communication at our institutions.
“PGY-1 residents will be excluded from the study because they infrequently hold primary responsibility for ICU-ward transfer communication at our institutions [9].”
From Improving Communication in Intensive Care Unit to Ward Transitions: Protocol for Multisite National Implementation of the ICU-PAUSE Handoff Tool (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
The survey is identical in content to a preimplementation survey of internal medicine residents conducted at BJH, UC, and UCSF in our prior study, which characterized types of miscommunication errors in ICU-ward handoffs.
“The survey is identical in content to a preimplementation survey of internal medicine residents conducted at BJH, UC, and UCSF in our prior study, which characterized types of miscommunication errors in ICU-ward handoffs [9].”
From Improving Communication in Intensive Care Unit to Ward Transitions: Protocol for Multisite National Implementation of the ICU-PAUSE Handoff Tool (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
A recent study of several teaching hospitals demonstrated high rates of communication errors-both commission and omission-and associated harms, including unplanned ICU readmissions, care delays, medication errors, missed results, and patient and family distress.
“A recent study of several teaching hospitals demonstrated high rates of communication errors—both those of commission and omission—and associated harms, including unplanned ICU readmissions, care delays, medication errors, missed results, and patient and family distress [9].”
From Improving Communication in Intensive Care Unit to Ward Transitions: Protocol for Multisite National Implementation of the ICU-PAUSE Handoff Tool (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
A preimplementation survey of resident trainees was already conducted at UC, UCSF, and WUSM during the 2015-2018 academic years to evaluate the frequency of communication gaps and medical errors related to ICU-ward transfers.
“A preimplementation survey of resident trainees was already conducted at UC, UCSF, and WUSM during the 2015-2018 academic years to evaluate the frequency of communication gaps and medical errors related to ICU-ward transfers [9].”
From Improving Communication in Intensive Care Unit to Ward Transitions: Protocol for Multisite National Implementation of the ICU-PAUSE Handoff Tool (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
The sample size is based on our work with the preimplementation cohort, and we will aim for at least 30% respondents at each site for the postimplementation surveys.
“The sample size is based on our work with the preimplementation cohort, and we will aim for at least 30% respondents at each site for the postimplementation surveys [9].”
From Improving Communication in Intensive Care Unit to Ward Transitions: Protocol for Multisite National Implementation of the ICU-PAUSE Handoff Tool (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
More than 87% of ICU doctors indicated that they faced adverse events related to communication issues during handoffs, such as omissions or misunderstandings of crucial diagnostic details, including pending results and required follow-up care.
“More than 87% of ICU doctors indicated that they faced adverse events related to communication issues during handoffs, such as omissions or misunderstandings of crucial diagnostic details, including pending results and required follow-up care [270].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [270]
Cites
Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program
Starmer, A. J., Spector, N. D., Srivastava, R., West, D. C., Rosenbluth, G., Allen, A. D., Noble, E. L., Tse, L. L., Dalal, A. K., Keohane, C. A., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1405556 · Cited by 947 · see citing works
Arora, V. M. (2005) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.015107 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Self-citationConsequences of Inadequate Sign-out for Patient Care
Horwitz, L. I., Moin, T., Krumholz, H. M., Wang, L., & Bradley, E. H. (2008) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.168.16.1755 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
A Model for Building a Standardized Hand-off Protocol
Arora, V. M., & Johnson, J. K. (2006) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety · doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32084-3 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Self-citationvan Sluisveld, N., Hesselink, G., van der Hoeven, J. G., Westert, G., Wollersheim, H., & Zegers, M. (2015) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3666-8 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Li, P., Stelfox, H. T., & Ghali, W. A. (2011) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.04.027 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Stelfox, H. T., Leigh, J. P., Dodek, P. M., Turgeon, A. F., Forster, A. J., Lamontagne, F., Fowler, R. A., Soo, A., & Bagshaw, S. M. (2017) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4910-1 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Understanding communication during hospitalist service changes: A mixed methods study
Hinami, K., Farnan, J. M., Meltzer, D. O., & Arora, V. M. (2009) · Journal of Hospital Medicine · doi:10.1002/jhm.523 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationFrom the ICU to the ward: cross-checking of the physician’s transfer report by intensive care nurses
Perren, A., Conte, P., Bitonti, N. D., Limoni, C., & Merlani, P. G. (2008) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-008-1138-0 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
A multidisciplinary initiative to standardize intensive care to acute care transitions
Halvorson, S. A. C., Wheeler, B., Willis, M., Watters, J. M., Eastman, J. M., O’Donnell, R., & Merkel, M. J. (2016) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzw076 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Participation and Experience of Third-Year Medical Students in Handoffs: Time to Sign Out?
Arora, V. M., Eastment, M. C., Bethea, E. D., Farnan, J. M., & Friedman, E. S. (2013) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2297-9 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationDuong, J. A., Jensen, T. P., Morduchowicz, S., Mourad, M., Harrison, J. D., & Ranji, S. R. (2017) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-017-4009-y · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Improving Resident Handoffs for Children Transitioning From the Intensive Care Unit
Warrick, D. M., Gonzalez-del-Rey, J. A., Hall, D., et al. (2015) · Hospital Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/hpeds.2014-0067 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Lyons, P. G., Arora, V. M., & Farnan, J. M. (2016) · Annals of the American Thoracic Society · doi:10.1513/annalsats.201512-789le · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnson, J. K., Arora, V. M., Barach, P. R., & Collaborative, O. B. O. T. E. H. R. (2013) · European Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3109/13814788.2013.819850 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationDetsky, M. E., Ailon, J., Weinerman, A. S., Amaral, A. C. K.-B., & Bell, C. M. (2014) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.026 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cocreating the ICU-PAUSE Tool for Intensive Care Unit–Ward Transitions
Santhosh, L., Rojas, J. C., Garcia, B., Thomashow, M., & Lyons, P. G. (2022) · ATS Scholar · doi:10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0135in · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“ICU – ward transitions are managed heterogeneously across health systems (1), which may affect hospital quality and safety (3).”
Self-citationFukui, E. M., Lyons, P. G., Harris, E., McCune, E. K., Rojas, J. C., & Santhosh, L. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/40918 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“A recent study of several teaching hospitals demonstrated high rates of communication errors—both those of commission and omission—and associated harms, including unplanned ICU readmissions, care delays, medication errors, missed results, and patient and family distress [9].”
InfluentialSelf-citationToward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors
Yen, C., Epling, J. W., Rockwell, M., & Vaughn-Cooke, M. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16020347 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Santhosh, L., Lyons, P. G., Rojas, J. C., Ciesielski, T. M., Beach, S., Farnan, J. M., & Arora, V.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- University of Chicago Medical Center (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Santhosh, Lekshmi
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMJ Quality & Safety
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2019-01-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 627-634
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5415
- 2044-5423
- OpenAlex
- W2910289174
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- UCSF Institutional Training Grant (2T32HL007185-41)
- Washington University of St. Louis Institutional Training Grant (5T32 HL007317, UL1 TR002345)
- University of Chicago Institutional Training Grant (T32 HL007605)
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF Academy of Medical Educators Innovations Gran)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI K24HL136859 Mid Career Mentoring Award)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
- Keywords
- patient handover, intensive care unit discharge, communication breakdown, process mapping, internal medicine residents, adverse events, patient transfer, academic medical centers
- MeSH terms
- Academic Medical Centers, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, United States, Health Care Surveys, Patient Handoff
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review