Clinical imaging in dementia with Lewy bodies
Open accessAbstract
Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a common neurodegenerative dementia in older people; however, the clinical features, particularly cognitive fluctuations and rapid eye movement sleep disorder, are often hard to elicit, leading to difficulty in making the diagnosis clinically. Here we examine the literature for the evidence behind imaging modalities that could assist in making the diagnosis. Dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging remains the best modality for differentiation from dementia of Alzheimer’s type with high sensitivity and specificity reported based on pathological diagnoses. 123 Iodine-metaiodobenzylguanidine myocardial scintigraphy (MIBG) however is rapidly becoming an alternative imaging modality for the diagnosis of DLB, though studies assessing its accuracy with postmortem verification are still awaited. However, there are suggestions that MIBG may be better in the differentiation of vascular parkinsonism from DLB than DAT scans but may have lower sensitivity for detecting DLB compared with the 80% sensitivity seen in DAT imaging. Structural MRI scans have long been used for the diagnosis of dementia; however, their utility in DLB is limited to revealing the presence of coexisting Alzheimer’s disease. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET is an alternative biomarker that can also differentiate Alzheimer’s disease and DLB but lacks the evidence base of both DAT and MIBG scans.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FP-CIT SPECT and MIBG are well-established markers for diagnosis of DLB with high sensitivity and specificity.
“Brain dopamine transporter imaging using 123I-Ioflupane (FP-CIT) SPECT and cardiac sympathetic nerve imaging using 131I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine myocardial scintigraphy (MIBG) are well established markers for the diagnosis of DLB with high sensitivity and specificity and both are indicative biomarkers as part of the current International Consensus diagnostic criteria for DLB [21, 144–146].”
From The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia (2023) · cites this paper as [144]
FP-CIT SPECT and MIBG are indicative biomarkers in the current International Consensus diagnostic criteria for DLB.
“Brain dopamine transporter imaging using 123I-Ioflupane (FP-CIT) SPECT and cardiac sympathetic nerve imaging using 131I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine myocardial scintigraphy (MIBG) are well established markers for the diagnosis of DLB with high sensitivity and specificity and both are indicative biomarkers as part of the current International Consensus diagnostic criteria for DLB [21, 144–146].”
From The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia (2023) · cites this paper as [144]
Cites
Autopsy validation of <sup>123</sup> I-FP-CIT dopaminergic neuroimaging for the diagnosis of DLB
Thomas, A. J., Attems, J., Colloby, S. J., O'Brien, J. T., McKeith, I., Walker, R., Lee, L., Burn, D., Lett, D. J., & Walker, Z. (2017) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000003512 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, S., Smailagic, N., Hyde, C., Noel-Storr, A. H., Takwoingi, Y., McShane, R., & Feng, J. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010386.pub2 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia
Chouliaras, L., & O’Brien, J. T. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02215-8 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
“…imaging using 131 I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine myocardial scintigraphy (MIBG) are well established markers for the diagnosis of DLB with high sensitivity and speci fi city and both are indicative biomarkers as part of the current International Consensus diagnostic criteria for DLB [21, 144 – 146].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Surendranathan, A., & O’Brien, J. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Corresponding author
- Surendranathan, Ajenthan
- Venue
- Evidence Based Mental Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2018-03-29
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 61-65
- ISSN
- 1362-0347 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-960X
- PMC
- PMC10270382
- OpenAlex
- W2794843639
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Evidence-Based Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Funders
- National Institute for Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- dementia with Lewy bodies, neuroimaging, dopamine transporter imaging, MIBG scintigraphy, FDG-PET, structural MRI, vascular parkinsonism, diagnostic accuracy
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Lewy Body Disease, Positron-Emission Tomography, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review