Cited by 167Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autopsy validation of 123 I-FP-CIT dopaminergic neuroimaging for the diagnosis of DLB

Open access

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a validation study of 123I-N-fluoropropyl-2b-carbomethoxy-3b-(4-iodophenyl) nortropane (123I-FP-CIT) SPECT dopaminergic imaging in the clinical diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) with autopsy as the gold standard. Methods: Patients >60 years of age with dementia who had undergone 123I-FP-CIT imaging in research studies and who had donated their brain tissue to the Newcastle Brain Tissue Resource were included. All had structured clinical research assessments, and clinical diagnoses were applied by consensus panels using international diagnostic criteria. All underwent 123I-FP-CIT imaging at baseline, and scans were rated as normal or abnormal by blinded raters. Patients were reviewed in prospective studies and after death underwent detailed autopsy assessment, and neuropathologic diagnoses were applied with the use of standard international criteria. Results: Fifty-five patients (33 with DLB and 22 with Alzheimer disease) were included. Against autopsy diagnosis, 123I-FP-CIT had a balanced diagnostic accuracy of 86% (sensitivity 80%, specificity 92%) compared with clinical diagnosis, which had an accuracy of 79% (sensitivity 87%, specificity 72%). Among patients with DLB, 10% (3 patients) met pathologic criteria for Lewy body disease but had normal 123I-FP-CIT imaging. Conclusions: This large autopsy analysis of 123I-FP-CIT imaging in dementia demonstrates that it is a valid and accurate biomarker for DLB, and the high specificity compared with clinical diagnosis (20% higher) is clinically important. The results need to be replicated with patients recruited from a wider range of settings, including movement disorder clinics and general practice. While an abnormal 123I-FP-CIT scan strongly supports Lewy body disease, a normal scan does not exclude DLB with minimal brainstem involvement. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that 123I-FP-CIT dopaminergic neuroimaging accurately identifies patients with DLB.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000003512

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kane J, Barker S, Surendranathan A, et al. Clinical diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies in routine secondary care clinical services: results from the DIAMOND-Lewy study. Am J Neurodegenerative Dis 2015;4(suppl 1):178.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, A. J., Attems, J., Colloby, S. J., O'Brien, J. T., McKeith, I., Walker, R., Lee, L., Burn, D., Lett, D. J., & Walker, Z.
Affiliations
Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Thomas, Alan J.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2017-01-17
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
276-283
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2559951892
Cited by
165
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 11
FWCI
16.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Society
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10048)
  • Newcastle University (G0400074)
  • Cambridge University Hospitals
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Medical Research Council (G0400074)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
dementia with Lewy bodies, 123I-FP-CIT, diagnostic accuracy, Lewy body disease, Alzheimer's disease, biomarkers, brainstem involvement
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Autopsy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurologic Examination, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Tropanes, Reproducibility of Results, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Chi-Square Distribution, Lewy Body Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review