The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative evaluation of group-based mindfulness-based stress reduction and cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment and management of chronic pain: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Question: This review compares mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) to cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) in its ability to improve physical functioning and reduce pain intensity and distress in patients with chronic pain (CP), when evaluated against control conditions. Study selection and analysis: Ovid MEDLINE, EmbaseClassic+Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify randomised controlled trials. The primary outcome measure was physical functioning. Secondary outcomes were pain intensity and depression symptoms. We used random and fixed effects (RE and FE) network meta-analyses (NMA) to compare MBSR, CBT and control interventions on the standardised mean difference scale. Findings: Twenty-one studies were included: 13 CBT vs control (n=1095), 7 MBSR vs control (n=545) and 1 MBSR vs CBT vs control (n=341). Of the 21 articles, 12 were determined to be of fair or good quality. Findings from RE NMA for change in physical functioning, pain intensity and depression revealed clinically important advantages relative to control for MBSR and CBT, but no evidence of an important difference between MBSR and CBT was found. Conclusions: This review suggests that MBSR offers another potentially helpful intervention for CP management. Additional research using consistent measures is required to guide decisions about providing CBT or MBSR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Our findings are reassuring that patients with CLBP, regardless of these baseline characteristics examined to date, could reasonably expect to benefit from either CBT or MBSR.44”
From Moderators and Nonspecific Predictors of Treatment Benefits in a Randomized Trial of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction vs Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy vs Usual Care for Chronic Low Back Pain (2023) · cites this paper as [44]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As in previous research in chronic pain (Veehof et al., 2016; Hilton et al., 2017; Khoo et al., 2019), compared to TAU, MBI produced a significant reduction at post-treatment in depressive symptoms, in one out of two studies (De Jong et al., 2018), and an increase in emotional awareness and self-regulation, in the one study that addressed this (De Jong et al., 2016).”
From A systematic review of cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions for comorbid chronic pain and clinically relevant psychological distress (2023) · cites this paper as Khoo et al., 2019
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“There is some evidence for specific effects of different forms of meditation practice on both the brain and behavior with longer and more intensive practice163–167.”
From A common factors perspective on mindfulness-based interventions (2022) · cites this paper as [167]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Hutton, B., Salanti, G., Caldwell, D. M., Chaimani, A., Schmid, C. H., Cameron, C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Straus, S., Thorlund, K., Jansen, J. P., et al. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-2385 · Cited by 8,269
Self-citationDowns, S. H., & Black, N. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 · Cited by 8,252
(2008) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,477
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3 · Cited by 4,255
Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Turk, D. C., Dworkin, R. H., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., Brandenburg, N., Carr, D. B., Cleeland, C., Dionne, R., Farrar, J. T., Galer, B. S., et al. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.001 · Cited by 3,510
R2WinBUGS : A Package for Running WinBUGS from R
Sturtz, S., Ligges, U., & Gelman, A. (2005) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v012.i03 · Cited by 1,654
Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults
Williams, A. C. D. C., Eccleston, C., & Morley, S. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007407.pub3 · Cited by 1,634
Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: Combining direct and indirect evidence.
Caldwell, D. M., Ades, A. E., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7521.897 · Cited by 1,600 · cited 1×
“All NMAs were performed using OpenBUGS software V.3.2.3 17 and R2OpenBUGS software V.3.2–3.2 18 in R (see eAppendix 6 in the online supplementary material 1 for the R Codes to Call OpenBUGS used for the NMA).”
InfluentialEhde, D. M., Dillworth, T. M., & Turner, J. A. (2014) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0035747 · Cited by 879
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 10.1037/0022-006X.56.2.261 · DOI
- Vlaeyen, 2005, Cognitive-behavioral treatments for chronic pain, 21, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mindfulness-based interventions: an overall review
Zhang, D., Lee, E. K. P., Mak, E. C. W., Ho, C. Y., & Wong, S. Y. S. (2021) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldab005 · Cited by 668
“A network metaanalysis found MBSR is effective for chronic pain, and the effects are not significantly different between MBSR and CBT; though more studies are needed to confirm this.(41) Furthermore, for the effects of brief MBIs with a total contact time of less than 1.”
BackgroundPsychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults
Williams, A. C. D. C., Fisher, E., Hearn, L., & Eccleston, C. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007407.pub4 · Cited by 605
Goldberg, S. B., Riordan, K. M., Sun, S., & Davidson, R. J. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620968771 · Cited by 520
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Practical Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines, 5th Edition
Harden, R. N., McCabe, C., Göebel, A., Massey, M., Suvar, T., Grieve, S., & Bruehl, S. P. (2022) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnac046 · Cited by 263
Mindfulness-Based Programs: Why, When, and How to Adapt?
Loucks, E. B., Crane, R. S., Sanghvi, M. A., Montero‐Marín, J., Proulx, J. A., Brewer, J. A., & Kuyken, W. (2022) · Global Advances in Health and Medicine · doi:10.1177/21649561211068805 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Khoo, E.-L., Small, R., Cheng, W., Hatchard, T., Glynn, B., Rice, D. B., Skidmore, B., Kenny, S., Hutton, B., & Poulin, P. A.
- Affiliations
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
- Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Poulin, Patricia A
- ORCID
- Venue
- Evidence Based Mental Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2019-01-31
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-35
- ISSN
- 1362-0347 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-960X
- PMC
- PMC10270397
- OpenAlex
- W2913124466
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Evidence-Based Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- mindfulness-based stress reduction, cognitive behavioral therapy, chronic pain, physical function, pain intensity, depression, group intervention, psychological pain management
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Psychotherapy, Group, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Chronic Pain, Mindfulness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
