Cited by 20Medical Education and AdmissionsInnovations in Medical EducationSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of non-clinical attributes in paramedicine using multiple mini-interviews

Open access
Tavares, Walter, Mausz, Justin·2015·Emergency Medicine Journal

Abstract

Background: Non-clinical attributes are increasingly emphasised as an important factor in paramedic practice. However, the assessment of these attributes often lacks the evidence base to support it. Exploring the relationship between non-clinical attributes and clinical skills is also of theoretical and practical importance. Objective: To first seek evidence of reliability and validity for the assessment of non-clinical attributes using the multiple mini-interview (MMI) in paramedic contexts and second, to explore the association between non-clinical attributes and clinical skills in paramedicine. Methods: Entry to practice level paramedic candidates completed a 10-station MMI to assess non-clinical attributes on day 1 and a 10-station simulation-based assessment (SBA) of clinical skills on day 2. Both were assessed using different global rating scales. Our primary outcomes included MMI inter-station reliability (calculated using generalisability theory) and Pearson's correlation between non-clinical attributes and clinically focused skills. Results: 30 trainees completed the MMI and 26 of the 30 completed the SBA. Inter-station reliability for the MMI reached 0.77. Pearson's correlations (disattenuated correlations in parentheses) between the overall MMI score and mean SBA global rating scores reached r=0.31 (r=0.48) and ranged by dimension from r=−0.11 (−0.17) (procedural skills) to r=0.54(r=0.83) (communication). Conclusions: The MMI demonstrated evidence of reliability and validity for the assessment of non-clinical attributes in paramedic contexts. Non-clinical attributes and paramedic clinical skills are likely distinct but related constructs, each contributing to the construct of paramedic practice. Programmes of assessment should include both to ensure the construct of paramedic practice is adequately represented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/emermed-2013-202964

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Tavares & Mausz (2013), inter-station reliability for the MMI reached 0.77.

    “Inter-station reliability for the MMI reached 0.77”

    From Multiple Mini Interview as an admission tool in higher education: Insights from a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Tavares W. and Mausz J., (44) 2013

  • In Tavares & Mausz (2013), Pearson's correlations between overall MMI score and mean Simulation-Based Assessment global rating scores reached r=0.31 (r=0.48) and ranged by dimension from r=−0.11 (−0.17) for procedural skills to r=0.54 (r=0.83) for communication.

    “Pearson's correlations between the overall MMI score and mean Simulation-Based Assessment (SBA) global rating scores reached r = 0.31 (r = 0.48) and ranged by dimension from r = −0.11 (−0.17) (procedural skills) to r = 0.54 (r = 0.83) (communication)”

    From Multiple Mini Interview as an admission tool in higher education: Insights from a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Tavares W. and Mausz J., (44) 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03407.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tavares, W., & Mausz, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Centennial College (CA)
Corresponding author
Tavares, Walter
Venue
Emergency Medicine Journal
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-09-27
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
70-75
ISSN
  • 1351-0622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-0205
  • 1472-0213
OpenAlex
W2123692198
Cited by
20
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emergency Medicine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Keywords
paramedic education, multiple mini-interviews, clinical skills assessment, simulation-based assessment, validity, communication skills, procedural skills, global rating scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Allied Health Personnel, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Professional Competence, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review