Cited by 49Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

Stress and coping in accident and emergency senior house officers

Open access
McPherson, S·2003·Emergency Medicine Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify levels of psychological distress in accident and emergency (A&E) senior house officers (SHOs). METHODS: Questionnaire survey given to SHOs at training sessions. MEASURES: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and the Brief COPE. RESULTS: Over half of the 37 respondents (51%; 95% CI: 36% to 67%) scored over the threshold for psychological distress on the GHQ. This is considerably higher than for other groups of doctors and for other professional groups. Correlational analysis revealed that the coping style Venting was significantly related to greater anxiety (r=0.34; p<0.05) and depression (r=0.33; p<0.05), while the coping style Active was significantly related to lower anxiety (r=-0.38; p<0.05), somatic complaints (r=-0.46; p<0.001) and years since qualification (r=0.40; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Replicating findings from a study of stress in A&E consultants, this study shows higher levels of overt psychological distress among A&E SHOs than among other groups of doctors. An intervention to improve coping strategies may be useful for this group of doctors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/emj.20.3.230

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McPherson, S.
Affiliations
The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
McPherson, S
Venue
Emergency Medicine Journal
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-05-01
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
230-231
ISSN
  • 1351-0622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-0205
  • 1472-0213
OpenAlex
W2163892823
Cited by
49
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emergency Medicine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Essex
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
psychological distress, occupational stress, coping strategies, senior house officers, anxiety, depression, venting, active coping, somatic symptoms, General Health Questionnaire, Brief COPE
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, London, Male, Medical Staff, Hospital, Occupational Diseases, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review