Cited by 49Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careResilience and Mental Health

Target Coping Strategies for Interventions Aimed at Maximizing Psychosocial Adjustment in People with Multiple Sclerosis

Open access
Grech, Lisa B., Kiropoulos, Litza A., Kirby, Katherine M., Butler, Ernest, Paine, Mark, Hester, Robert·2018·International Journal of MS Care

Abstract

Background: The experience of psychological distress is prevalent in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), including high levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. It has been shown that people with MS use less adaptive coping compared with healthy individuals. This study examined the ability of coping strategies to predict maladaptive and adaptive psychosocial outcomes across areas of stress, depression, anxiety, and quality of life (QOL) in people with MS. Methods: 107 people with MS completed measures of depression (Beck Depression Inventory–II), anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), QOL (Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life–54), stress (Daily Hassles Scale), and coping (COPE inventory). Results: Consistent with expectations, depression, frequency of stress, trait anxiety, and mental health QOL were predicted by adaptive and maladaptive coping styles. Severity of stressful events was predicted by maladaptive, but not adaptive, coping styles. Depression and mental health QOL were most prominently connected to coping use. Emotional preoccupation and venting showed the strongest relationship with poorer psychosocial outcomes, whereas positive reinterpretation and growth seemed to be most beneficial. Conclusions: The results of this study highlight the importance of intervention programs targeting specific coping strategies to enhance psychosocial adjustment for people with MS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7224/1537-2073.2016-008

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotional discharge emerged as a very problematic coping strategy for people with multiple sclerosis.

    “Emotional discharge emerged, indeed, as a very problematic coping strategy for pwMS, as previously reported [34].”
  • Active coping, problem resolution, planning problem solving, cognitive positive restructuring, emotional and instrumental social support, emotional expression, acceptance and growth are related to higher quality of life in multiple sclerosis.

    “Active coping, problem resolution, planning problem solving, cognitive positive restructuring, emotional and instrumental social support, emotional expression, acceptance and growth were related to a higher QoL in MS.51 71 79–82”
  • Strategies based on acceptance and active commitment led to higher quality of life in multiple sclerosis.

    “On the contrary, strategies based on acceptance and active commitment, such as active coping, humour, problem resolution, cognitive positive restructuring and emotional expression, led to higher QoL in MS.51 71 79–82”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [14]14. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. Ways of Coping Questionnaire: Permissions Set, Manual, Test Booklet, Scoring Key. Sunnyvale, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press Inc; 1988.
  2. [31]31. Summerfeldt LJ, Endler NS. Coping with emotion and psychopathol- ogy. In: Zeidner M, Endler NS, eds. Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, Applications. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1996:602-639.
  3. [38]38. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Manual for the Hassles and Uplifts Scales: Research Edition. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1989.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grech, L. B., Kiropoulos, L. A., Kirby, K. M., Butler, E., Paine, M., & Hester, R.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Grech, Lisa B.
Venue
International Journal of MS Care
Published
2018-05-01
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
109-119
ISSN
1537-2073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2727329506
Cited by
49
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of MS Care (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, coping strategies, psychosocial adjustment, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life, maladaptive coping, adaptive coping, venting, positive reappraisal, growth, intervention targeting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review