CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 68Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsMedical Malpractice and Liability Issues

Epidemiology of medical error

Weingart, S. N·2000·Western Journal of Medicine
DOI 10.1136/ewjm.172.6.390
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Newspaper and television stories of catastrophic injuries occurring at the hands of physicians spotlight the problem of medical error but provide little insight into its nature or magnitude. 1Physicians, patients, and policymakers may underestimate the magnitude of risk and the extent of harm.We review the epidemiology of medical error, concentrating primarily on the prevalence and consequences of error, which types are most common, which physicians make errors, and the risk factors that increase the likelihood of injury from error. PREVALENCE AND CONSEQUENCES IN HOSPITALS Benchmark studiesThe Harvard study of medical practice is the benchmark for estimating the extent of medical injuries occurring in hospitals.Brennan et al reviewed the medical records of 30,121 patients admitted to 51 acute care hospitals in New York State in 1984. 2 They reported that adverse events-injuries caused by medical management that prolonged admission or produced disability at the time of discharge-occurred in 3.7% of admissions.A subsequent analysis of the same data found that 69% of injuries were caused by errors. 3In a study of the quality of Australian health care, a population-based study modeled on the Harvard study, investigators reviewed the medical records of 14,179 patients admitted to 28 hospitals in New South Wales and South Australia in 1995. 4 An adverse event occurred in 16.6% of admissions, resulting in permanent disability in 13.7% of patients and death in 4.9%; 51% of adverse events were considered to have been preventable.The number of preventable adverse events is important because both preventable and potentially adverse events (or "near misses") imply medical error.In contrast, nonpreventable adverse events suggest that anticipated and unavoidable complications were present.In the Australian study, the higher rate of adverse events was attributed in part to methodologic differences between the 2 studies, but a real difference in the rate of injuries to patients in the 2 populations could not be excluded.No study rivals the scope of the Harvard and the Australian studies except for a recent replication of the Harvard study in Colorado and Utah. 5 Even so, the results probably represent an estimate of the lower boundary of the prevalence of medical injury and error.The Harvard investigators defined adverse events stringently, using disability and injury as prerequisites.This underestimates the error rate because many errors do not produce injury; they are caught in time, the patient is resilient, or luck is good.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ewjm.172.6.390

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Weingart, S. N.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Weingart, S. N
ORCID
Weingart, S. N
Venue
Western Journal of Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2000-06-01
Volume
172
Issue
6
Pages
390-393
ISSN
0093-0415 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1136/ewjm.172.6.390
OpenAlex
W4241428051
Cited by
68
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Western Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Keywords
medical errors, medical malpractice, adverse events, patient harm, preventable adverse events, near misses, hospital quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review