Cited by 772Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesGenetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Mismatch Repair Status and BRAF Mutation Status in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Pooled Analysis of the CAIRO, CAIRO2, COIN, and FOCUS Studies

Open access
Venderbosch, Sabine, Nagtegaal, Iris D., Maughan, Tim S., Smith, Christopher G., Cheadle, Jeremy P., Fisher, David, Kaplan, Richard, Quirke, Philip +8 more·2014·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the prevalence and prognostic value of mismatch repair (MMR) status and its relation to BRAF mutation (BRAFMT) status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Experimental Design: A pooled analysis of four phase III studies in first-line treatment of mCRC (CAIRO, CAIRO2, COIN, and FOCUS) was performed. Primary outcome parameter was the hazard ratio (HR) for median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in relation to MMR and BRAF. For the pooled analysis, Cox regression analysis was performed on individual patient data. Results: The primary tumors of 3,063 patients were analyzed, of which 153 (5.0%) exhibited deficient MMR (dMMR) and 250 (8.2%) a BRAFMT. BRAFMT was observed in 53 (34.6%) of patients with dMMR tumors compared with 197 (6.8%) of patients with proficient MMR (pMMR) tumors (P < 0.001). In the pooled dataset, median PFS and OS were significantly worse for patients with dMMR compared with pMMR tumors [HR, 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12–1.57 and HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.13–1.61, respectively), and for patients with BRAFMT compared with BRAF wild-type (BRAFWT) tumors (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.17–1.54 and HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.66–2.19, respectively). PFS and OS were significantly decreased for patients with BRAFMT within the group of patients with pMMR, but not for BRAF status within dMMR, or MMR status within BRAFWT or BRAFMT. Conclusions: Prevalence of dMMR and BRAFMT in patients with mCRC is low and both biomarkers confer an inferior prognosis. Our data suggest that the poor prognosis of dMMR is driven by the BRAFMT status. Clin Cancer Res; 20(20); 5322–30. ©2014 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0332

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Venderbosch, S., Nagtegaal, I. D., Maughan, T. S., Smith, C. G., Cheadle, J. P., Fisher, D., Kaplan, R., Quirke, P., Seymour, M. T., Richman, S. D., Meijer, G. A., Ylstra, B., Heideman, D. A. M., de Haan, A. F. J., Punt, C. J. A., & Koopman, M.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • 1Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Medical Research Council (GB)
  • St James's University Hospital (GB)
  • 7Department of Medical Oncology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • 8Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • 9Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Corresponding author
Koopman, Miriam
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2014-10-14
Volume
20
Issue
20
Pages
5322-5330
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2159064822
Cited by
772
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 2
FWCI
13.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (A4850)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L01629X/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
mismatch repair deficiency, BRAF mutation, metastatic colorectal cancer, prognostic factors, progression-free survival, overall survival, first-line therapy, microsatellite instability, individual patient data pooling
MeSH terms
MutL Protein Homolog 1, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasm Metastasis, Nuclear Proteins, Prognosis, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Colorectal Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, DNA Methylation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, DNA Mismatch Repair

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review