CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A proof of concept study establishing Necator americanus in Crohn’s patients and reservoir donors

Croese, J, O’Neil, J, Masson, J, Cooke, S, Melrose, W, Pritchard, D, Speare, R·2006·Gut
DOI 10.1136/gut.2005.079129
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

[Extract] The emergence of autoimmunity, including Crohn’s disease (CD) where the immune relationship with commensal bacteria is corrupted, has been linked to hygiene.1 2 A gradual decline in endoparasites is but one argument that might explain this phenomenon.3 Weinstock and colleagues have successfully tested the pig whipworm, Trichuris suis, in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).4 5 However, repeated inoculation was required and concern has been raised that aberrant migration could occur.6 The haematophagous hookworm, Necator americanus (NA), is proposed as an alternative. We have tested if CD patients tolerate hookworm infection, and the practical issues associated with establishing reservoir donors (RDs).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.2005.079129

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1056/NEJMra020100 · DOI
  2. 10.1056/NEJMra020831 · DOI
  3. 10.1067/mlc.2002.124343 · DOI
  4. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.01.005 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1136/gut.2004.041749 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1097/01.MIB.0000160369.47671.a2 · DOI
  7. 10.1056/NEJMra032492 · DOI
  8. 1976, Gastroenteroogy, 70, 439, 10.1016/S0016-5085(76)80163-1 · DOI
  9. 1989, Gastroenterology, 96, 804, 10.1016/S0016-5085(89)80080-0 · DOI
  10. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.03.015 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Croese, J., O’Neil, J., Masson, J., Cooke, S., Melrose, W., Pritchard, D., & Speare, R.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-12-12
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
136-137
ISSN
  • 0017-5749
  • 1468-3288
DOI
10.1136/gut.2005.079129
Cited by
216
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review