The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is rapidly increasing in Asia, but screening guidelines are lacking. Through reviewing the literature and regional data, and using the modified Delphi process, the Asia Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer and international experts launch consensus recommendations aiming to improve the awareness of healthcare providers of the changing epidemiology and screening tests available. The incidence, anatomical distribution and mortality of CRC among Asian populations are not different compared with Western countries. There is a trend of proximal migration of colonic polyps. Flat or depressed lesions are not uncommon. Screening for CRC should be started at the age of 50 years. Male gender, smoking, obesity and family history are risk factors for colorectal neoplasia. Faecal occult blood test (FOBT, guaiac-based and immunochemical tests), flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy are recommended for CRC screening. Double-contrast barium enema and CT colonography are not preferred. In resource-limited countries, FOBT is the first choice for CRC screening. Polyps 5-9 mm in diameter should be removed endoscopically and, following a negative colonoscopy, a repeat examination should be performed in 10 years. Screening for CRC should be a national health priority in most Asian countries. Studies on barriers to CRC screening, education for the public and engagement of primary care physicians should be undertaken. There is no consensus on whether nurses should be trained to perform endoscopic procedures for screening of colorectal neoplasia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes
Schreuders, E. H., Ruco, A., Rabeneck, L., Schoen, R. E., Sung, J. J. Y., Young, G. P., & Kuipers, E. J. (2015) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2014-309086 · Cited by 1,328
Self-citationYeoh, K.-G., Ho, K.-Y., Chiu, H.-M., Zhu, F., Ching, J. Y. L., Wu, D.-C., Matsuda, T., Byeon, J.-S., Lee, S.-K., Goh, K.-L., et al. (2011) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2010.221168 · Cited by 331
Self-citationWu, C. W., Ng, S. S. M., Dong, Y. J., Ng, S. C., Leung, W. W., Lee, C. W., Wong, Y. N., Chan, F. K. L., Yu, J., & Sung, J. J. Y. (2012) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2011.239236 · Cited by 275
Self-citationWu, C. W., Ng, S. C., Dong, Y., Tian, L., Ng, S. S. M., Leung, W. W., Law, W. T., Yau, T. O., Chan, F. K. L., Sung, J. J. Y., et al. (2014) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-1750 · Cited by 135
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sung, J. J. Y., Lau, J. Y. W., Young, G. P., Sano, Y., Chiu, H. M., Byeon, J. S., Yeoh, K. G., Goh, K. L., Sollano, J., Rerknimitr, R., Matsuda, T., Wu, K. C., Ng, S., Leung, S. Y., Makharia, G., Chong, V. H., Ho, K. Y., Brooks, D., Lieberman, D. A., Chan, F. K. L., & for The Asia Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-07-15
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1166-1176
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166811751
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2007.146316
- The paper
- Sung, J. J. Y., Lau, J. Y. W., Young, G. P., Sano, Y., Chiu, H. M., Byeon, J. S., Yeoh, K. G., Goh, K. L., Sollano, J., Rerknimitr, R., Matsuda, T., Wu, K. C., Ng, S., Leung, S. Y., Makharia, G., Chong, V. H., Ho, K. Y., Brooks, D., Lieberman, D. A., . . . for The Asia Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer. (2008). Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2007.146316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.