The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score: a validated tool that stratifies risk for colorectal advanced neoplasia in asymptomatic Asian subjects
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a clinical risk score predictive of risk for colorectal advanced neoplasia for Asia. Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional and multicentre study was carried out in tertiary hospitals in 11 Asian cities. The subjects comprise 2752 asymptomatic patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. From a development set of 860 asymptomatic subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy, multiple logistic regression was applied to identify significant risk factors for advanced colorectal neoplasia defined as invasive carcinoma or advanced adenoma. The ORs for significant risk factors were utilised to develop a risk score ranging from 0 to 7 (Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) score). Three tiers of risk were arbitrarily defined: 0–1 ‘average risk’ (AR); 2–3 ‘moderate risk’ (MR); and 4–7 ‘high risk’ (HR). Subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy between July 2006 and December 2007 were prospectively enrolled to form an independent validation group. Each subject had a personal APCS score calculated by summing the points attributed from the presence of risk factors in the individuals. The performance of the APCS score in predicting risk of advanced neoplasia was evaluated. Results: There were 860 subjects in the derivation set and 1892 subjects in the validation set, with a baseline prevalence of advanced neoplasia of 4.5% and 3%, respectively. Applying the APCS stratification in the validation set, 559 subjects (29.5%) were in the AR tier, 966 subjects (51.1%) in the MR tier and 367 (19.4%) subjects in the HR tier. The prevalence of advanced neoplasia in the AR, MR and HR groups was 1.3, 3.2 and 5.2%, respectively. The subjects in the MR and HR tiers had 2.6-fold (95% CI 1.1 to 6.0) and 4.3-fold (95% CI 1.8 to 10.3) increased prevalence of advanced neoplasia, respectively, than those in the AR tier. Conclusions: The APCS score based on age, gender, family history and smoking is useful in selecting asymptomatic Asian subjects for priority of colorectal screening.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Cancer Statistics, 2002
Parkin, D. M., Bray, F., Ferlay, J., & Pisani, P. (2005) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74 · Cited by 18,196
Reducing Mortality from Colorectal Cancer by Screening for Fecal Occult Blood
Mandel, J. S., Bond, J. H., Church, T. R., Snover, D. C., Bradley, G. M., Schuman, L. M., & Ederer, F. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199305133281901 · Cited by 3,229
Levin, B., Lieberman, D. A., McFarland, B., Andrews, K. S., Brooks, D., Bond, J., Dash, C., Giardiello, F. M., Glick, S., Johnson, D., et al. (2008) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002 · Cited by 2,990
Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer
Hardcastle, J. D., Chamberlain, J. O., Robinson, M. H., Moss, S. M., Amar, S. S., Balfour, T. W., James, P. D., & Mangham, C. M. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03386-7 · Cited by 2,793
Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test
Kronborg, O., Fenger, C., Olsen, J., Jørgensen, O. D., & Søndergaard, O. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03430-7 · Cited by 2,501
Colonoscopy in Colorectal-Cancer Screening for Detection of Advanced Neoplasia
Regula, J., Rupinski, M., Kraszewska, E., Polkowski, M., Pachlewski, J., Orlowska, J., Nowacki, M. P., & Butruk, E. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa054967 · Cited by 788
Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in Asia: implications for screening
Sung, J. J., Lau, J. Y., Goh, K., & Leung, W. (2005) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70422-8 · Cited by 740
Self-citationCost-effectiveness of Screening for Colorectal Cancer in the General Population
Frazier, A. L. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.15.1954 · Cited by 648
Cost-Effectiveness of Colonoscopy in Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Sonnenberg, A., Delcò, F., & Inadomi, J. M. (2000) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-133-8-200010170-00007 · Cited by 612
Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening
Sung, J. J. Y., Lau, J. Y. W., Young, G. P., Sano, Y., Chiu, H. M., Byeon, J. S., Yeoh, K. G., Goh, K. L., Sollano, J., Rerknimitr, R., et al. (2008) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2007.146316 · Cited by 348
Self-citation
Cited by
Gut mucosal microbiome across stages of colorectal carcinogenesis
Nakatsu, G., Li, X., Zhou, H., Sheng, J., Wong, S. H., Wu, W. K. K., Ng, S. C., Tsoi, H., Dong, Y., Zhang, N., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9727 · Cited by 701
Self-citationJeon, J., Du, M., Schoen, R. E., Hoffmeister, M., Newcomb, P. A., Berndt, S. I., Caan, B., Campbell, P. T., Chan, A. T., Chang-Claude, J., et al. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.02.021 · Cited by 312
Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines
Saito, Y., Oka, S., Kawamura, T., Shimoda, R., Sekiguchi, M., Tamai, N., Hotta, K., Matsuda, T., Misawa, M., Tanaka, S., et al. (2021) · Digestive Endoscopy · doi:10.1111/den.13972 · Cited by 170
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yeoh, K.-G., Ho, K.-Y., Chiu, H.-M., Zhu, F., Ching, J. Y. L., Wu, D.-C., Matsuda, T., Byeon, J.-S., Lee, S.-K., Goh, K.-L., Sollano, J., Rerknimitr, R., Leong, R., Tsoi, K., Lin, J.-T., Sung, J. J. Y., & for the Asia-Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2011-03-14
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1236-1241
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2123837974
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score: a validated tool that stratifies risk for colorectal advanced neoplasia in asymptomatic Asian subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2010.221168
- The paper
- Yeoh, K.-G., Ho, K.-Y., Chiu, H.-M., Zhu, F., Ching, J. Y. L., Wu, D.-C., Matsuda, T., Byeon, J.-S., Lee, S.-K., Goh, K.-L., Sollano, J., Rerknimitr, R., Leong, R., Tsoi, K., Lin, J.-T., Sung, J. J. Y., & for the Asia-Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer. (2011). The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score: a validated tool that stratifies risk for colorectal advanced neoplasia in asymptomatic Asian subjects. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2010.221168
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.